Jump to content

Actual color photograph of comet 67P.


Fr8monkey

Recommended Posts

That is not an "actual color" photo but simulated.

Artist said this about this photo: "Hi all, no raw data.

No OSIRIS image has been released with different filters so can get an RGB image as result.

We started with a single image flic.kr/p/p6kuZs working on the information that we all know (low albedo, dusty surface, and so on), obtaining three virtual layer. Processing, as long as even our eyes were pleased and believed what they was looking at.

In a way, we pushed to limit a technique that we use for a long time to make color native b/w shots to increase the visual perception."

Source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/lunexit/14999812157/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, this is a simulated photo and in fact quite useless because no colour data has been released yet. They could've painted it green or purple.

The brightness has been increased enormously, too. I wish ESA would release something an astronaut would actually see, holding on the probe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This.

Change the misleading title.

From the article:

Mission managers used Rosetta's OSIRIS multi-colour camera, which has 12 different colour filter wheels to capture this image.

Comet-67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko is blacker than coal dust, with only four per cent of sunlight being reflected from the surface.

To counter this effect, the image had the brightness and contrast enhanced to give a more meaningful view for humans to see.

And it is a color photo, so I don't know what the big deal is...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you can read Italian then it explains it a little more here: http://www.aliveuniverseimages.com/speciale-missioni/missioni-nel-sistema-solare/rosetta/930-esa-rosetta-i-primi-dati-di-alice,-cosima,-osiris-e-virtis

But I posted an English response from these guys on the first page too.

It might represent real colors but it is a simulated, thus a guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:D

Large objects with very low albedo actually look decently lit when viewed from distance because, with increasing distance, their angular diameter drops a lot more faster than the amount of light that reaches the sensor. Also, remember that the human eye is adaptable to even very low levels of light. Even with bright and dark stuff in the same field of vision, eye+brain can process an image quite well.

I'm sure the comet would be quite apparent to a human eye at Rosetta's distances.

What could suffer is eyes' ability to distinguish colours. With dropping luminosity, we're less and less able to perceive hue and saturation. I'm not sure how apparent would that be in this very case, but it has to be considered as a possibility.

Consider these photos.

Coal_Mine_Plant_an+opencast+coal+mine.jpg

2011-08-23-06731.jpg

Typical comets are just a bit more darker than coal.

Edited by lajoswinkler
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...