Official Weekly (Biweekly?) Spacecraft Exchange Showcase Thread

[KotDemopan]

I felt a Robot Wars-like vibe at 5:27-rest of the small tank battles.

Oh, and i noticed Majorjim had a cameo piloting a tank!

And on an unrelated note, the Surface-to-Surface Missile carrier maaaay just be able to destroy the car.

Edited March 24, 2015 by KotDemopan

[Majorjim!]

Dude what the f**k?

Are you really so petty that you dedicated a large portion of the video to attempts at mocking me? This makes you seem very bitter mate, considering our differing positions on this forum. Also you used one of my oldest craft that is clearly broken by the .90 update.. Also the N1K is a very old craft of mine too.

I will use this post to ask you not to use any of my craft in any of your future videos. In fact I explicitly asked you not to use my craft just to explode them in a previous post.

I could be wrong but I have a suspicion that Panzers tank bearing that you liked so much is my mini bearing. Or at least based on it. I cannot confirm this as none of the links you posted work..

I am not happy at all with this. Please respect my wishes and do not use any of my awesome craft in any of your future videos.

Thank you.

MJ

Edited March 24, 2015 by Majorjim

[Mad Rocket Scientist]

Have a look:

My company!

Not all stock; however noted if mod.

Take a close look at this one: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/113356-It-s-here!-The-Omega-good-looking-heavy-lift-vehicle?p=1791423#post1791423

Thanks!

[astecarmyman]

Dude what the f**k?

Are you really so petty that you dedicated a large portion of the video to attempts at mocking me? This makes you seem very bitter mate, considering our differing positions on this forum. Also you used one of my oldest craft that is clearly broken by the .90 update.. Also the N1K is a very old craft of mine too.

I will use this post to ask you not to use any of my craft in any of your future videos. In fact I explicitly asked you not to use my craft just to explode them in a previous post.

I could be wrong but I have a suspicion that Panzers tank bearing that you liked so much is my mini bearing. Or at least based on it. I cannot confirm this as none of the links you posted work..

I am not happy at all with this. Please respect my wishes and do not use any of my awesome craft in any of your future videos.

Thank you.

MJ

I am not mocking you, the Biplane actually did not fly well. I'm sorry I didn't meet the time-frame required to actually fit in two more reviews, and of complex craft such as your mun-lander.

Yes the Panzer 3 uses your stock bearing. I admit that. I never said I made the bearing. (In fact I haven't even released it yet, or made a video of it)

I wasn't trying to make your Biplane explode, it nose-dives quite frequently.

Please don't be mad at me for an attempt at constructive criticism. (I am trying to review the craft here)

If your craft are not compatible with the 0.90 update, you could at least list that in your company thread before getting angry that something doesn't work.

If you have any specific craft in mind that you wish me to review, I can do that, but if you don't want to be featured at all, then I will respect your wishes.

EDIT: Panzer 3 I made using MJ's stock bearing

[Majorjim!]

I am not mocking you, the Biplane actually did not fly well. I'm sorry I didn't meet the time-frame required to actually fit in two more reviews, and of complex craft such as your mun-lander.

Yes the Panzer 3 uses your stock bearing. I admit that. I never said I made the bearing. (In fact I haven't even released it yet, or made a video of it)

I wasn't trying to make your Biplane explode, it nose-dives quite frequently.

Please don't be mad at me for an attempt at constructive criticism. (I am trying to review the craft here)

If your craft are not compatible with the 0.90 update, you could at least list that in your company thread before getting angry that something doesn't work.

If you have any specific craft in mind that you wish me to review, I can do that, but if you don't want to be featured at all, then I will respect your wishes.

EDIT: Panzer 3 I made using MJ's stock bearing

http://i.imgur.com/tgDdWiV.png

Mate using a clearly broken craft is not "constructive criticism" I stated on this thread that if you use someones craft you should consult them first about it.

If you had done this then you wouldn't have used it. As you did use it its clearly an attempt to put me down in some childish way. And that just makes you look a bit green to be frank.

I am not angry that some of my craft are broken by updates that's a given isn't it.

I have made a huge number of very well liked craft and I rarely check or update my repository and often forget about my old craft. I did post that craft may be broken in a post in the repository but anyone with eyes will know which ones are broken.

Anyway I don't want anything more to do with this so I will leave it here.

Thank you.

MJ

[eorin]

Why don't you give a go on my full stock sukhoi pak-fa replica?

It handles very well and is stable even without SAS.

250 parts

controls:

-1 toggle engines

-0 toggle hidden ladder

here it is

DOWNLOAD

[astecarmyman]

Mate using a clearly broken craft is not "constructive criticism" I stated on this thread that if you use someones craft you should consult them first about it.

If you had done this then you wouldn't have used it. As you did use it its clearly an attempt to put me down in some childish way. And that just makes you look a bit green to be frank.

I am not angry that some of my craft are broken by updates that's a given isn't it.

I have made a huge number of very well liked craft and I rarely check or update my repository and often forget about my old craft. I did post that craft may be broken in a post in the repository but anyone with eyes will know which ones are broken.

Anyway I don't want anything more to do with this so I will leave it here.

Thank you.

MJ

It was never my intention to put anyone down. I'm sorry if I made you upset bro.

I'll modify the submission rules if that will please you.

[GusTurbo]

I thought it was pretty uncalled-for to slag Majorjim like that in the video. It's pretty clear what your intention was, which was to be insulting. MJ's criticisms of your first video were spot-on, and it's a shame that you didn't heed them. I know I posted one of my craft earlier in this thread, but I would ask that you please don't use any of my creations.

[Capt Snuggler]

I thought it was pretty uncalled-for to slag Majorjim like that in the video. It's pretty clear what your intention was, which was to be insulting. MJ's criticisms of your first video were spot-on, and it's a shame that you didn't heed them.

Agreed Gus, nasty stuff.

first off I can vouch for the biplane working just fine pre .90 and working correctly post .90 with only minor adjustments to control surfaces.

Your "review" is not constructive criticism, its retaliation, you should research the difference before making your next video. or maybe childish, tactless, ignorance is your angle. In which case great work alienating your potential viewers. carry on.

You reap what you sow.

-Snug

[8bitgammers]

Agreed Gus, nasty stuff.

first off I can vouch for the biplane working just fine pre .90 and working correctly post .90 with only minor adjustments to control surfaces.

Your "review" is not constructive criticism, its retaliation, you should research the difference before making your next video. or maybe childish, tactless, ignorance is your angle. In which case great work alienating your potential viewers. carry on.

You reap what you sow.

-Snug

people, i just don't understand what all this fuss is about.

i mean he's already apologized for this.

if i were to be completely honest i wouldn't care if he just showed my craft exploding as it drives off the runway five times.

even if he was trying to make some kind of statement, that's just his opinion.

[Capt Snuggler]

people, i just don't understand what all this fuss is about.

i mean he's already apologized for this.

if i were to be completely honest i wouldn't care if he just showed my craft exploding as it drives off the runway five times.

even if he was trying to make some kind of statement, that's just his opinion.

You know we are talking about the second video right? the one where he quotes Jims constructive comment, then proceeds to slag off his work in retaliation. if you cant see it for the attack that it is, I'm not going to bother trying to convince you. The video had a sour tone. it was uncalled for.

-Snug

[8bitgammers]

You know we are talking about the second video right? the one where he quotes Jims constructive comment, then proceeds to slag off his work in retaliation. if you cant see it for the attack that it is, I'm not going to bother trying to convince you. The video had a sour tone. it was uncalled for.

-Snug

oh, i thought that you were talking about the first craft he reviewed in the video.

i guess i can now see how you would take offense to that.

yet, he did already apologize.

[DMSP]

As said before, please change your video scheme/idea!

I thought this would be a video series about these amazing craft being shown to their full potential.

Please...

The topic right now (Second Video) is "Crash, Boom, Bang, Wow!"

Yeah.

Also, try to show less tanks. KSP is about exploration, it really was not meant for tanks and weaponized craft.

There are so many amazing craft but if you focus on what you are focusing on now, you'll miss 60% of them.

This does have incredible potential though.

-DMSP

[8bitgammers]

As said before, please change your video scheme/idea!

I thought this would be a video series about these amazing craft being shown to their full potential.

Please...

The topic right now (Second Video) is "Crash, Boom, Bang, Wow!"

Yeah.

Also, try to show less tanks. KSP is about exploration, it really was not meant for tanks and weaponized craft.

There are so many amazing craft but if you focus on what you are focusing on now, you'll miss 60% of them.

This does have incredible potential though.

-DMSP

bro, i agree with everything you're sayin'

except the tank part.

i say MORE TANKS!!

it is what the game is meant for for me and lots of others.

come on man!!!!

[DMSP]

bro, i agree with everything you're sayin'

except the tank part.

i say MORE TANKS!!

it is what the game is meant for for me and lots of others.

come on man!!!!

That is true.

But personally, I've seen way to many tanks and not enough Exploratory ships.

There should be one weaponized thing per episode.

[astecarmyman]

That is true.

But personally, I've seen way to many tanks and not enough Exploratory ships.

There should be one weaponized thing per episode.

I suppose that's true, but then again, once you seen em once, you've probably seen em all.

By exploratory ships, what do you mean exactly?

Portable compact colonies or Apollo rockets?

I'll try to fit in some more rockets and less rovers this time.

[KotDemopan]

I suppose that's true, but then again, once you seen em once, you've probably seen em all.

By exploratory ships, what do you mean exactly?

Portable compact colonies or Apollo rockets?

I'll try to fit in some more rockets and less rovers this time.

Rovers are a mode of transportation, just a slow one.

Now, when you put weapons on rover(or, anything for that matter), however....

[DMSP]

Rovers are a mode of transportation, just a slow one.

Now, when you put weapons on rover(or, anything for that matter), however....

Exactly.

Here's my idea:

Review the craft in detail, show what it's meant for, its strengths and weaknesses (Don't be too harsh) and then, make something funny happen to the craft!

Always have a little humor in the videos, but not to much.

-DMSP

[Jon144]

Does Majorjim among others not understand humor?

I did not understand your post to the fullest but it sounded like you were the one who is bitter. Especially of accusing him of stealing your bearing design. Even if he did why is it prohibited from using other peoples concepts and designs? Without that engineering would not be what it is today.

I never felt as if he was being purposefully rude in the videos.

That being said I think some of the memes, mlg and jokes were laid on a bit to strong in the first part of the video. Unlike SOMEONE however I am eagerly awaiting the next episode and what jokes might come with.

Put as much humor in it as you want. Just don't make it as repetitive. The funny thing is it takes a long time to edit a video but a short time to watch it.

I am also kind of disappointed in people saying less tanks. I don't think KSP is all about exploration. I think it is all about engineering. A lot of those tanks take a lot more work to build right than many rockets do. Especially when you throw stock bearings and axels on them.

It is true the show currently is tank-overloaded. So while I work on my next one I will submit a plane this time.

Download: https://www.dropbox.com/s/rjguw21gk0lpm1y/K-22H3%20Rapier.craft?dl=0

More information: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/114048-K-22H3-Stock-Air-Superiority-Fighter

Edited March 28, 2015 by Jon144

[DMSP]

Does Majorjim among others not understand humor?

I did not understand your post to the fullest but it sounded like you were the one who is bitter. Especially of accusing him of stealing your bearing design. Even if he did why is it prohibited from using other peoples concepts and designs? Without that engineering would not be what it is today.

I never felt as if he was being purposefully rude in the videos.

That being said I think some of the memes, mlg and jokes were laid on a bit to strong in the first part of the video. Unlike SOMEONE however I am eagerly awaiting the next episode and what jokes might come with.

Put as much humor in it as you want. Just don't make it as repetitive. The funny thing is it takes a long time to edit a video but a short time to watch it.

I am also kind of disappointed in people saying less tanks. I don't think KSP is all about exploration. I think it is all about engineering. A lot of those tanks take a lot more work to build right than many rockets do. Especially when you throw stock bearings and axels on them.

It is true the show currently is tank-overloaded. So while I work on my next one I will submit a plane this time.

http://i.imgur.com/srp1yoL.png

Download: https://www.dropbox.com/s/rjguw21gk0lpm1y/K-22H3%20Rapier.craft?dl=0

I think he understands humor.

Just like you said, the show is tank overloaded.

I like it, but less humor, more detailed reviews.

[Majorjim!]

Does Majorjim among others not understand humor?

I did not understand your post to the fullest but it sounded like you were the one who is bitter. Especially of accusing him of stealing your bearing design. Even if he did why is it prohibited from using other peoples concepts and designs? Without that engineering would not be what it is today.

I never felt as if he was being purposefully rude in the videos.

That being said I think some of the memes, mlg and jokes were laid on a bit to strong in the first part of the video. Unlike SOMEONE however I am eagerly awaiting the next episode and what jokes might come with.

Put as much humor in it as you want. Just don't make it as repetitive. The funny thing is it takes a long time to edit a video but a short time to watch it.

I am also kind of disappointed in people saying less tanks. I don't think KSP is all about exploration. I think it is all about engineering. A lot of those tanks take a lot more work to build right than many rockets do. Especially when you throw stock bearings and axels on them.

It is true the show currently is tank-overloaded. So while I work on my next one I will submit a plane this time.

http://i.imgur.com/srp1yoL.png

Download: https://www.dropbox.com/s/rjguw21gk0lpm1y/K-22H3%20Rapier.craft?dl=0

I am pretty sure you can figure out what the action-groups do on your own. There are a lot.

I know I said I wouldn't but I had to comment on this.

I never accused him of stealing my design. In fact I openly encourages others to use it!!

I was in error as he was mocking me in the video then praised a design I believed used my bearing and it seems ironic to me.

Turns out the one in video does not use my bearing but he did use it in his design shown in his post.

I would never stop anyone copying any design I come up with.

So, enough has been said on this matter, let's let it die the death it deserves.

[Guest]

I am not mocking you, the Biplane actually did not fly well. I'm sorry I didn't meet the time-frame required to actually fit in two more reviews, and of complex craft such as your mun-lander.

Yes the Panzer 3 uses your stock bearing. I admit that. I never said I made the bearing. (In fact I haven't even released it yet, or made a video of it)

I wasn't trying to make your Biplane explode, it nose-dives quite frequently.

Please don't be mad at me for an attempt at constructive criticism. (I am trying to review the craft here)

If your craft are not compatible with the 0.90 update, you could at least list that in your company thread before getting angry that something doesn't work.

If you have any specific craft in mind that you wish me to review, I can do that, but if you don't want to be featured at all, then I will respect your wishes.

EDIT: Panzer 3 I made using MJ's stock bearing

http://i.imgur.com/tgDdWiV.png

I just watched the video and I'd like to add something you seem not aware of; KSP updates changed a lot of part properties (mass, wings lift values etc..)

So the older the craft, the more it will behave in ways that weren't intended by the builder at the time.

So unfortunately, criticizing the handling of any pre 0.20 craft will end up in nothing but you making a fool of yourself by your lack of knowledge of the game's evolution.

[KotDemopan]

And, you know, 1.0 is nigh! So the flying planes in those videos may or may not be working in the new aerodynamics.

[Jon144]

And, you know, 1.0 is nigh! So the flying planes in those videos may or may not be working in the new aerodynamics.

Com'on we can all agree the new aerodynamics will be a welcome change.

I personally have never been very angry at having my planes broken by updates. I used to have a space shuttle with a stock working cargo bay door before there were stock cargo bay doors. But since the update came with stock cargo bay doors who couldn't be happy? Even though we lose stuff each update we get even better stuff.

That being said I don't think i'm entirely satisfied with 1.0 coming out directly after going into beta. Makes me worry if future features hinted at will be sold separately or ditched completely. I STILL WANT GAS GIANT 2 AND MULTIPLAYER.

/rant

Edited March 26, 2015 by Jon144

[8bitgammers]

Exactly.

Here's my idea:

Review the craft in detail, show what it's meant for, its strengths and weaknesses (Don't be too harsh) and then, make something funny happen to the craft!

Always have a little humor in the videos, but not to much.

-DMSP

this is very well stated.

Although i Love the video Content and have no Problem with craft selection, i see that the video did seem to Rush over crafts leaving out the important parts.

if i were to make a suggestion it would be that the videos do not have to be that fast.

i know that people can get board easily, but I'm afraid this "Super Speed" video style with MLG every 2.5 sec. is detracting from the viewing experience.

MLG moments should occur at the beginning and end of each craft reviewed, and craft reviews should be taken slowly and orderly: first in VAB or SPH, then tests, then Fun!, MLG Repeat...

something like that.