TheRedTom
-
Posts
159 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Bug Reports
Posts posted by TheRedTom
-
-
2 minutes ago, ZooNamedGames said:
Thankfully MER doesn't have that. It's a problem with Curiosity, not Opportunity.
Unfortunately, all American rovers since Sojourner have the same system
-
19 minutes ago, ZooNamedGames said:
Disappointing. Maybe I can find a mod maker who'd be interested in helping, or find an existing model and port it into KSP.
@akron has mentioned eventually getting to MER and MSL in his pack Probes Plus!, but it's a long way down the line by all accounts. The most difficult bit seems to be the rocker-bogie suspension, which is difficult to achieve in KSP
-
2 hours ago, CobaltWolf said:
-
10 hours ago, cxg2827 said:
Nice work benjee
real talk
He lives! Miss your work man. Looks amazing @benjee10!
Footage of Hype reaction to public release of reHabTech (2019, colorised)
-
23 minutes ago, benjee10 said:
~Snip~
Looking fantastic! HYPE
-
19 hours ago, damonvv said:
But what is stockalike these days? Prior to 1.4 and Making History. This fitted perfectly into the stock parts. NI made a stockalike version for the Falcon 9. Not my intention to make it look like the real life thing.
Now, barely anything that was used to be "stockalike" doesn't fit anymore. Squad really has gone for a more modern and whiter look. I am not sure if I should take that direction as well. Probably not any time soon. Like @Stone Blue told me the other day, KSP is changing. (Not really the direction I wanted it to go) but oh well.4I think this has really brought Restock to the fore. The change in artstyle with the new parts means the rocketry parts are even more different to the Porkjet parts
-
15 hours ago, Beale said:
14 hours ago, Saltshaker said:Spartans! Shields!
-
On 9/4/2018 at 9:58 PM, Beale said:
So... What did I say I would do next? Remind me.
*whispers*
-
Think you could get the same result (and be more accurate) having the supports wavey like so:
This would give it a bit of texture
-
11 hours ago, Beale said:
Playing with the clay.
~snip~
Living it up in the HOTOL California
-
4 hours ago, mr. engino said:
Well, I finally found the soviet equivalent of BDB! While I wait for Kopernicus to update so I don't lose progress on my save, I'd like to know: does this mod have soviet probes along with manned spacecraft?
1Tantares has a great Phobos
Other places for Soviet Probes include Probes Plus which has a superb Venera (also done by @Beale IIRC)
-
7 minutes ago, CobaltWolf said:
Still very WIP
~Snip~
As well as an older WIP with a quick test of the tank in ｅｘｃｉｔｉｎｇ ｃｉｔｒｕｓ ｆｌａｖｏｒ
~Snip~
Z E S T Y
-
2 hours ago, Tweeker said:
Sorry about that,
~Snip~
How did you calculate that corrected thrust?
-
22 minutes ago, damonvv said:
*ahem*
-
57 minutes ago, sslaptnhablhat said:
Erm, I know. I meant how Kristall had a second APAS-89 port on one side and a weird bulge on the other, Zarya has a similar thing. It just looks weird leaving it blank.
You mean like the silver cover on the topside of Zarya? I've been using the Vostok Parachute for now but I agree, would be a nice thing to have
Maybe instead of a special version of the Mir 6-way adapter with 4 ports we could have the 6-way adapter and a part to cover the unused attachment nodes
-
54 minutes ago, ARTOBAN said:
how to install a file with the .cfg extension ?
Go into Notepad or Notepad++ or any other plain text editor and save your code as a .cfg file. Then just put it into a folder named e.g. 000theredtompatches and drop into your gamedata folder.
-
On 6/5/2018 at 3:59 AM, MikeO89 said:
I have a request to cobaltwolf. Your csm engine for the Apollo craft is really weak on the thrust. It has about 1/10th the thrust of other command service module engines. Makes for super long burns to do stuff. Could you make a second csm engine to be more in line with the others? Choice is a good thing. Thanks for listening.
If you mean the making history service module engine, that is a known bug/balance faux pas. The BDB one is balanced to the rest of the mod and the wider stock parts, its the MH one that's off.
-
10 hours ago, General Apocalypse said:
It looks nothing like it , at least from my perspective. The AJ10-137 is a tiny engine of 100kg with a trust of 40 kN.
The Wolfhound is 2.5 ton 375 kN powerhouse. The main grip people have is the ISP. Which is similar to the RS-25.
2I'm sorry but you're just wrong. The Wolfhound (RE-J10) is a purpose-built replica of the Apollo Service Module Propulsion engine.
The fact it's a massive powerhouse with rediculous ISP is what we're complaining about. The AJ-10 is pressure fed and hypergolic with an ISP of 319!
-
14 minutes ago, Drakenex said:
Beautiful
Where did you get the decals?
Don't forget the black chines on Columbia
-
3 hours ago, Beale said:
Blok-E
~Snip~
So Blok E is the upper stage for Vostok, but the info on the upper stage for Voskhod seems a bit less clear. Is it just the same as the Soyuz 3rd stage? There's some mention of a Blok-L upper stage based on Molinya but this is the best image I can find
Also, any plans to do the special fairing used for Vostok and Voskhod?
-
2 hours ago, Beale said:
The craft and ascent are classic
Almost would not need dedicated Polyus parts almost.
~Snip~
I see what you did there
Looks fantastic, Tantares goes from strength to strength! Keep it up
-
3 hours ago, woeller said:
Thank you! I'am waiting for your nosecones
I mean the upcoming cones. Maybe something greyish like this?
Those grey bits are actually landing gear if you can believe it
-
13 hours ago, Beale said:
~Snip~
зенитʙᴏʏᴇ
-
29 minutes ago, TheKSPBeginner said:
the proton rocket flips
Like this? Admirable dedication to realism @Beale
Maybe instead of a special version of the Mir 6-way adapter with 4 ports we could have the 6-way adapter and a part to cover the unused attachment nodes
[1.12.X] Tantares - Stockalike Soyuz and MIR [26.0][18.12.2023][Soyuz Revamp Again]
in KSP1 Mod Releases
Posted