Astronomer

Members
  • Content Count

    525
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

544 Excellent

About Astronomer

  • Rank
    Head of the Illuminati

Recent Profile Visitors

4,230 profile views
  1. Astronomer?

    If you're reading this, would you allow me to upload a download link for AVP-EoO? It works with 1.3, and uses a feature from Insterstellar to make Jool look the same as in Insterstellar.

     

    So, do i have permission?

  2. This is actually the best mod. Edit: BTW, this reminds me of the fun mechanic utilized in Stellaris. It would be awesome if KSP had a lore-friendly mod with chance / resource / career based decisions during the missions with small rewards.
  3. Gotta miss the terrain feature. Is it ever coming back?
  4. Not sure if I should use a modular structure again or just make one good build. Either way, if you don't install TextureReplacer the skybox will stay stock. Edit: No, I decided to hold off on that for now. I might release a closed beta later.
  5. Hey there! I just started a thread which doesn't have much atm, but I guess it's a start. Edit: How do I link a user?!
  6. How do I quickscope add an album inside a post? I'm guessing you can't on these new forums. Anyways, this is the official album which will change a lot over time. CONFIRMED FEATURES - BEING UPDATED New super-ultra-mega-high quality city textures now span Kerbin. Mind the traffic! The Kerbol system is now drifting through a majestically colorful nebula! 2048x2048 4096x4096 volumetric snow particles that showcase the stinging fury of the frozen poles. 8k auroras have been reimagined with volumetric support! A new "UHD" volumetric cloud variant that will put your NASA supercomputer to a real test! Dust storms on Duna have been reworked. The clouds on both poles have been removed due issues with shadows & volumetric lighting. Loading... Modpage
  7. Hey, guys! Thank you for keeping the mod alive! As you probably all know I'll be releasing a new version soon for 1.2 (on the same mod page, will start a new thread). I've already reworked snow and will bring back lightning as an optional feature. I can't think of a way to make rain with playable performance, but I'll try. I'll link to the windowshine mod from within the pack as one of the recommended mods though. Matchlight, it's up to you if you wanna lock this thread, but if you wanna keep working on this version as a stand-alone that's fine. Maybe rename it to something like "Matchlight's Astronomer's Visual Pack"? Who knows, maybe 10 years from now there's gonna be a thread called "Aleph Null's Sagan's MLG420Illuminati's CenaKiller99's Gelileo's Matchlight's Astronomer's Visual Pack", but probably not. If you guys have a great suggestion do let me know! Update: Like Galileo said though - it's best we leave rain up to blackrack.
  8. I don't have any substantial bug to report, but I've experienced what I suspect is a well-known issue. However, personally I haven't noticed anyone post pictures pointing it out. The UV texture causes lines such as this all over the layer. The strength of these lines seems to be slaved to the strength of the UV texture. There seems to be no way to make them disappear completely without setting the UV strength to 0. UPDATE: Forgot to mention that it doesn't seem to matter whether you use a custom texture or not.
  9. Great update. I haven't experienced any issues so far, besides this one on Duna. UPDATE: This seems to be one of the things caused by GUI changes.
  10. As much as I wish to keep the wishes of Nhawks17, I must clear up the fact that I have never stated that Galileo has stolen from me or has committed fraud against me. I understand the perspective you are coming from, but to quote myself here - I have made it very clear that it is not only my pack I am talking about: "a lot of assets originate from my visual pack, as well as other packs (please correct me if I'm wrong)". I could recognize the rest of the individual assets, but I did not know that they were all from Nhawks17's pack. And secondly I have made it much clearer that this is not a direct attack of person, but of the case at hand: "I merely wish to state my views on art and how I think should evolve over time.", "I respect you, as well as your decision to use these assets as they fall under the license which I had included in my pack. However my upcoming release will fall under a different license.", "If you are wondering if I am ever going to hold you up for this, my answer is no", etc. Once again: to say that I have an issue with Galileo is to get as far from truth as Saganly possible.