catloaf

whites acting kinda sus

Lagotron 1: combines every visual mod into one so ksp can bake your gpu too.

You have been banned for causing undefined. You are banned for -2147483647 years.

Rc piper cub. I don't know, do the zombies like rc planes?

It seems like squad thinks it's a bad suggestion.

The goal of this game is to come up with a product that would appear on a site like wish.com, and then come up with what you would actually get. Example:

This one seems to apply to squad: add an actually good update the focusses on fixing bugs and doesn't add more bugs than it remove.

Do not the pre-built.

RSSV: rss but Venus is the home planet.

Rules: come up with the worst computer specs you can think of. You do not need the whole computer, but you do need CPU and GPU (if it uses integrated graphics just put "integrated graphics") RAM, case, motherboard and PSU are preferable but not required. My entry: Core 2 duo, nvidia gt 130, 2 gb ddr2, 8 gb hdd, "old dell" style case, 150 watt psu, "old dell" style motherboard. (Yes, if it's appropriate you don't need to use real components.)

I'm not getting you a new computer because your current one is fine for schoolwork. The title: My Cool Mod (1.7.x and below NO 1.8.x+)

Krakener: causes krakens to happen before important milestones in a mission, only works with quicksaves off.

IKWSWDN (I know what squad will do next) adds a few useless parts, makes changes to the engine that do nothing, but break mods, and adds 500 major bugs, while fixing 3 minor ones. Does not fix the fuel transfer bug, or maneuver node crashes. Makes the graphics feel even more GTX 460. Specifically designed to conflict with scatterer, even though there is no good reason why it should.

You need to make a new death note @probe137!

Ok, here's you Titan RTX I want a very very very tall building.

Yes, did you know that Jupiter and Neptune also haven't cleared their paths? Also, considering what happened to our dino friends, I seriously doubt Earth has cleared it's path. Not disagreeing with Pluto's status, just pointing out how ludicrous it is. I actually agree with the iau that Pluto should be classed as a dwarf planet, but the definition of a dwarf planet they came up with is really stupid. Why can't they just do something reasonable like a mass limit (what they do for stars and galaxies.) Like if it's bigger than earth's moon than it's a planet and if it's smaller than it's a dwarf planet.

I don't know, but that kind of is what ksp2 is for. It is definitely more work than it's worth for ksp1. Although it is probably why we haven't seen any major performance enhancing mods for ksp1

Not really, but they would have to use a different system for collision and bending than they use now, or somehow optimize the current system.

Do not the ms DOS

<you have died of dysentery, would you like to self destruct your pc (y/n) >y <are you sure? (y/n) >y <please enter your computer password or type cancel >********* <self destruct imminent <error: you must give the program administrator access to self destruct your pc >_

Do not do not submit reply.

-72, you find Nokia's folding phone.

Yes, once craft exceed 500 parts performance drops off very quickly, on PC and console. However poor game optimizations and lower hardware would probably make it worse on console.