• Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

8753 Excellent

About regex

  • Rank
    Peace, Love, and the R-7 Family

Profile Information

  • Location Eugene, Oregon
  1. This^ I have fan plates for my gaming AND development laptops; they're cheap insurance for your hardware.
  2. +1 for this suggestion. I play on permadeath and the suggestion that all my astronauts are clones is ... depressing.
  3. I don't think OP needs your approval of "solid"-ness to make the decision for themselves. I'm sure they know what's best for them. I bought my laptop for around $1300. Could I have bought a laptop and desktop for the same? Sure, I could have bought a comparable desktop for like, what, $800 or $900 and hooked it up to the 24" widescreen I already have, leaving enough for a decent development laptop. Could I have bought a laptop and desktop, with similar stats, from Dell using my Preferred Account what I've had on autopay for the last eight or nine years and don't have to think about? No. Financing helped make that decision for me (and one of the reasons I go for somewhat overpriced Dells since I'm already in with them for literally thousands in interest and no one offers better rates for computer equipment) along with some other considerations I've already mentioned. But here's the thing: I shouldn't have to tell this story to ask whether and how the new i7, 16GB, 1050M laptop I'm considering will run KSP with all those saucy mods. Just my take.
  4. There's no anger there, I just don't understand why OP is asked to clarify their choice of a laptop when they're asking others about their choice of laptop hardware. OP clearly implied they specifically want a laptop so that choice has already been made. vOv
  5. Some of us prefer the portability for a gaming setup. Some of us literally game at the kitchen table because the office separates us from our family. Some of us value a do-all computer in one package rather than having a ton of gadgets. I don't really see the point of the question. OP clearly wants a new laptop, there's no reason to debate that point and they likely have circumstances that make it more attractive to them than to you.
  6. I'm running an Alienware 15 R2 with an i5, 16GB RAM, and a 965M, Full RO/RSS setup with RSSVE and 8K textures runs great, and a stock setup with visual mods runs just as good. On a mechanical hard drive even. That laptop you spec'd should be just fine for KSP with all the sauce.
  7. This is me exactly except when I'm making an actual RO replica. Sometimes I get fanciful but my names are almost always some variation of "Crew Shuttle" and "Duna Tug".
  8. Even if they did, what legal recourse do they have against something they have precisely zero knowledge of? If it's all private between a few parties and no one's advertising the pack as their own or some other shenanigans then as far as the mod author is concerned it's just someone using their project as intended. It's not like you can magically tell a copied install apart from a manual install...
  9. Eclipses are pretty mundane in stock.
  10. Look, if the OP is just sharing the GameData directory with a friend then mod licenses hardly matter; it's basically personal use and it's a bundle between friends, probably falls under Fair Use. Just zip up everything but the Squad folder and send it on its merry way. It's an easier way than making a mod list and compiling all the personal changes so someone else can do the same. OTOH if OP is planning on making that available to more than just a few frienda who want to share a common install then they need to pay attention to mod licensing and possibly support concerns. Bottom line: Keep it personal and there's nothing anyone can really gripe about. Make it public and you run into usage concerns.
  11. Earth time, always. That's the way it was and that's the way it will always be. Keeps things in perspective when it takes a little over a year to get to Jool.
  12. So ... that's the finished product or is it still work-in-progress?
  13. We officially don't have placeholders.
  14. It's a work-in-progress.
  15. KSP's planets are already pseudorandom in a sense. Sure, there's a heightmap but for pretty much all of the planets in the game it's basically just Perlin noise, IIRC. Plus, the PQS mods all use procedural generation, probably with a static seed. Biggest problem for procedurally generated planets in KSP would probably be the biome maps, any well-written generator worth its salt could equal the bland planets we have now. I mean, look at NMS, you wouldn't need a fraction of that for KSP. This is probably the best way to do it, have a pool of curated planets that get generated into a random solar system. Varying the PQS seed would provide the needed randomness to ensure that visits to the curated planets aren't exactly the same as the last save game. Probably a lot of other randomized enhancements that could be made. Hell, they'd probably end up looking better than the planets we have now.