KSP Loading... 1.8 Preview: Service Bays Revamp

[Lisias]

On 10/2/2019 at 5:16 PM, Barzon said:

nice, but not as good as ReStock. This is your job, put some effort in. If a group of volunteers on the internet can out do you, you're doing something wrong.

Is this group of Volunteers fully maintaining a Space Exploration Sandboxes game (not to mention migrating the 3D engine)? Or they are just toying around some textures? 

How about a PlayStation release of such Add'On? How many crashes they fixed with that textures?

You see, ReStock IS nice, but it does not fixed the prefab glitch on some UI Controls, or the drag issue on crafts where the root part is a cargo bay, or enhances physics and graphics performance. Neither Planets/Moons features.

"Their job" is way bigger than some part texturing. And they need to pay their bills using KSP's revenue at the same time.

[QWERTYkeyboards]

On 10/2/2019 at 4:05 PM, sh1pman said:

Nice. I wish we had a variant without top and bottom surfaces (like Mk3 bays) so that they can be stacked seamlessly to form one long bay...

That would be great.

[Jognt]

On 11/27/2019 at 12:37 PM, Lisias said:

Is this group of Volunteers fully maintaining a Space Exploration Sandboxes game (not to mention migrating the 3D engine)? Or they are just toying around some textures? 

How about a PlayStation release of such Add'On? How many crashes they fixed with that textures?

You see, ReStock IS nice, but it does not fixed the prefab glitch on some UI Controls, or the drag issue on crafts where the root part is a cargo bay, or enhances physics and graphics performance. Neither Planets/Moons features.

"Their job" is way bigger than some part texturing. And they need to pay their bills using KSP's revenue at the same time.

Completely irrelevant because this model won’t fix/change any of the things you mentioned either. And this thread is about feedback about this model.

[snip]

Edited January 13, 2020 by Snark
Redacted by moderator

[Snark]

Some content has been redacted and/or removed, due to, 1. off-topic bickering about mods, and 2. personal remarks, people accusing each other of rudeness, etc.

Folks, just a friendly reminder to keep it on topic and discuss the service bay revamp in KSP, feedback about the models, etc. -- this is not the place to argue about the merits or diligence of various mods.

And kindly keep any judgmental diatribes about other forum users' character or comportment to yourself. It's not your place to judge others, and personal remarks of any sort are never appropriate. If you see someone behaving so egregiously that you believe that they're breaking forum rules, then by all means report the post and the moderators will have a look. Otherwise though, other people's "behavior" is not your place to judge or criticize, so please confine your remarks to addressing the actual content of the post rather than your perception of the character of the poster.

Thank you for your understanding.

[Jognt]

<snip>

The feedback on the part (from me) is that it’s rather bland. I’ll keep it at that so as to not repeat a past discussion. 

<snip>

Edited January 13, 2020 by Geonovast

[Snark]

Yet more content has been removed. Folks, when moderators say to "stop something, please", that means stop it.

It appears that the previous admonishment wasn't sufficiently clear, so a bit more explicitly this time:

"I like / dislike this part, because <reason>" = okay. That's your opinion and you're entitled to it, just as other people are entitled to theirs.

Criticizing the motivations or validity of someone else's opinion, or their right to express it = not okay. It's not your place to judge others. You can express a differing opinion, but you're not in a place to say that you're right and they're wrong, because opinions are subjective.

Continuing an argument or topic after a moderator has specifically said to knock it off = really not okay. Folks, when we say this sort of thing, we mean everyone. Including you.

We always prefer to allow folks to express themselves freely, which is why we try to avoid stepping in unless we really have to. But that also means that when we do step in, we really mean it, and everyone needs to cooperate . If you think we've made a mistake, by all means take it up privately with us via PM-- we're only human, after all, and we're happy to listen and consider.

Thank you for your understanding.