cantab

Do not think I haven't seen through your plans. I consider this to be the last correct number, being near-simultaneous with my minus to 31 and both in response to the previous post of 30. (Though at the time of posting it is moot). And I shall be looking to catch the GMs for a ruling on deliberate trap setting. Minus 1, to reach 30.

Drop it to minus 30.

-31 (-)

On point, down to -29

down to -26

-24 (-)

Drop to -22. Onwards and downwards!

-20 (-)

-18 (-)

-13 (-) Hey, that's a lucky number, since it's the opposite of 13.

-11 (-)

FAR makes a voxel model of the whole craft which it uses to work out drag. That means that the vast majority of parts that aren't wings will work fine. There are sometimes problems with unusual parts. Wings and control surfaces are handled differently, and they do need FAR configs to work properly. FAR is not aimed at changing the heating, though blatant bugs exist; Ferram discussed them above. FAR offers a lot more control than stock, but you can't pick an airfoil, it just uses a single generic one all the time. I'm not sure exactly how FAR works under the hood, but I'm pretty sure it's not CFD, that would be way too processor-intensive. The lift curve you show, with a hysteresis effect, is something I've seen in FAR. Many of your other questions I've never actually tested.

Down to -10.9999999999999999999...

-11 (-)

-12.000

-12 (-)

-12 (-)

-10 (-)

touche -8 (-)

I must admit I see a problem. Any glass sphere strong enough to hold a breathable pressure within, when it's vacuum outside, is going to be tough to break.

If it wasn't for us, this would just be "count to a hundred". I think we can all agree that would be far more boring. -8 (-)

-8 (-)

-8 (-) Spaceplaneaddict, reinforcements?

-8 (-)

-8 (-)