RoverDude

Non-permissive license unfortunately (no derivatives), unless that changed recently. I'm thinking radially attached ones that dynamically expand as fuel is added

What would be nice would be super-lightweight inflatable fuel tanks. Damn... I think I just talked myself into a new mod...

To be honest, that makes no sense - a graphics driver should not care at all about the pathing. Are you hitting a 255 character path limitation? That's a windows thing. So I really can't see changing the pathing for Karbonite and all of my mods, as there are a lot of shared components (hence the USI folder), and it would absolutely break some of them because of how KSP loads DLLs. A bigger question would be whether or not there are other folks in the thread using OpenGL and 64 bit who are NOT having the issue. i.e. it could be something completely orthagonal, since by moving the files you changed the load order (trust me, this matters - there is a VERY good reason USI starts with a 'U' - I had to ditch Green Mesa Industries when I started modding due to DLL loading issues).

Yep, just a config tweak. btw - the weight is part of what balances Karbonite engines - it's just not effective to haul around, at least not without the heavy thrust of a Karbonite engine. I guess my counterpoint would be that I find the idea that folks would mine a raw material, then launch a ship to orbit to process it, not the most efficient thing in the world. It makes sense in Kethane because there's no real difference, and better to leave it in a malleable form (i.e. why have a surface rig and all of it's headaches? Just deal with it in orbit). On the flipside, ORS removes the pain of finding a good spot or establishing a permanent base, so it needed a counterbalance otherwise Karbonite is a bit too much of an 'i win' resource. Hope that makes sense?

What I would do is just implement a small, radially attached, expandable ARM-Claw that could be used for fuel transfer. No muss no fuss.

hmmm... lemme noodle it over. The main rub is going to be controlling the darn thing

Awesome - start a dev thread, PM me the link Thanks! yup! I expect awesomeness to occur

Make a thread and get me a link so I can add it

Working on it now The aweesome bit... is that you can use it WITHOUT an asteroid. So you can build rock-powered ferries, etc.

Yep, all of the folks who pitched in are super awesome, and wearing out my rep button

It does, folks just want it on the first screen like stock - right now it shows 0 because that's what it has. Easy fix

Added to the issues list

Video on how to use ORS/SCANSat with Karbonite: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMozN4jpxbU&feature=youtu.be

I still want to work with you on this Hands are just a bit full at the moment tho

Something like that - Kravity said he was working on some bits Also - send me that radial tank please!

Karbonite will have oceanic extractors. the support is already there, just need the parts

Silly questions... Do you have an empty fuel tank? Is it in the same stack? Pictures help.

Please don't do this Bear in mind you were on a dev pre-release. ALL part names changes - by design. The names/etc. are now locked in for release. Do it This is a community project after all. 1. See above 2/3/4 - no idea, but hotspots are static (they will not change). You probably just have a visual bug - I see this sometimes if I look at hotspots at very high altitudes. Try around 250K

What was it? I'm curious.

I endorse this worldview.

FYI - I just took a clean install, added in 0.19.3 of MKS/OKS, and built a base in 64-bit. I then installed Karbonite, overwrote any duplicates, created a Karbonite detecting sattelite and got within a few hundred meters of my orbital base. Switched back and forth, everything fully functional and responsive. So there looks to be no conflict from my end. OH... and I'm moving this to showcase Looks like we have enough stuff and look stable enough for showtime

FYI - I just tested the latest build of SCANSat with the current MKS/OKS/Karbonite versions with zero issues.

Specificity or I can't help you. Do you have any Karbonite? How is it connected? Do you have context menus? Are you on the current version (0.1.1)? You can leave the MKS/OKS folder, but delete the Karbonite ones. More specificity... can you convert or no? No menus at all? Screenshots and more context please. There is already an ILM/ISM that holds Karbonite The others would be just ones to hold generic resources - not opposed to it at all. TextureReplacer is my repeated attempt to slay that particular compatability demon

Do it here so folks can help you sort out any issues before release. Easy question. What version of MKS? There was a new version less than a week ago.

Nifty! Turn this into it's own release thread and I'll happily link to it. Stuff tends to get lost in all of this Part names are locked btw, there is now a set convention that allows us to expand later on. I love it! Sure, why not I'm wrapping up some changes on 0.1.1 - all of the stuff folks have reported thus far - and I have even made a new video on how to use ORS to get resources, and how to use SCANSat... which should chop the posts in this thread in half