-
Posts
5,244 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Everything posted by PB666
-
It has its weaknesses. Don't stake your mission on the reliability of the suicide countdown. I prefer to do my own transfers, Mech Jeb takes to long waiting than then wastes too much fuel when it does.
-
Not, i did not edit it, the server appended the posts, i qouted the post validating that i submitted a new post, not responsible for server screwups. Examine carefully, the quote has the edit, so it had to have already been edited when i posted.
-
Someone forgot to refresh.
-
-75 (-) -76 (-)
-
Anyone ever built their own strut from scratch?
PB666 replied to Fengist's topic in KSP1 Modelling and Texturing Discussion
Made fixed linked struts and stand alone connectors, basically for providing a scaffold for panels, lightweight and for in orbit construction. -
-71 (-)
-
So after looking through the archives here and finding next to no discussion of the changes that Unity 5 KSP 1.1 caused I thought I would create this thread. First change. The form factor radii appear to all have changed, F0 = 0.25, F1 = 0.5, F2 = 1, F3 = 1.5 Second change. How you import your part tools has changed. Note: like with PT 0.23 I simply created an empty template with part tools and copy it for each new part. Third change of course we are using part tools 11-2 Forth change is there are a whole bunch of new assets that I'm not to sure how to use. Before installing the New Unity I tried to mod an old part with my old Unity today and it gave me a version warning, not sure why, so now I am unable access my old project.
- 2 replies
-
- unity 5
- part tools
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
-65 (-)
-
-63 (-)
-
Eh? -53 (-)
-
Black Holes - Spinning faster than light?
PB666 replied to JMBuilder's topic in Science & Spaceflight
Read what he said, when they pass the event horizon, from our perspective universe, the particle ceases to exist and become part of the singularity. Or let me put it to you like this. Imagine you have a perfect cube of empty space-time and you could move it where you wanted to, now imagine if you could push that cube of empty space toward a black hole, as it approached the event horizon 1 of its dimensions would shrink to nothing (quantum space time intercellular distances would only be relevant in 2 dimension, a curvature on the surface at the event horizon) as it touched the event horizon its time dimension would fade (in other words watching a clock on the object slow and then stop, just like a photon it would no longer age), and as it crossed the horizon its 2 remaining dimensions would fuse leaving one dimension. As you precede to the event this has consequences, because your 3 dimension fill with quantum foam and since this alters your perception of distance your eyes percieve your feet and the top of your head moving away from you at the speed of light, eventually your body parts stretch out and then vanish. This is in essence the communication problem, there is a belief in quantum mechanics that all starting states can be reconciled with events in the future, that system information is propagated forward in time, but when information crosses the black holes event horizon the information is seemingly lost, but through the processes of quantum space-time at the boundary and Hawkings radiation the information is preserved. Since we cannot see into a black hole from an observer its a quantum singularity, which means its one-dimensional, but the radiation that comes from a black hole emanates from the shell representing the event horizon, this is a form of communication. Its somewhat a contradication and somewhat not, the information at the surface is not due to the dimensionality of the information inside, simply the amount of energy the shell is a result of the energy within. The observable shell is not shaped by the shape of things inside, those things exist in a non-observable sub-universe, but the position and shape is due to the center of energy of that non-observable system and can be represented by a singularity floating around in 'our' space-time (oxymoron but useful since the differences in motion outside of the black hole are trivial relative to the space-time at the event horizon). Another thing to remember, black holes curve space time, this creates alot of contradictions, so there are alot of guesses about what goes on inside of a black hole. If we follow the trend at the even horizon your XZ dimensions eventually shrink its as if you become a conical strand of spagetti that shrinks to nothing as you merge at the center. As you the internal observer, cross the horizon your lines compress into a point roughly at c, This create contradictions on how space-time should behave, particularly at the quauntum level, these contradictions can best be handled by creating an unknown physical state such as the starting state of the universe. In other we arge given an universal starting state and inflation then Universe. By the same token we can argue given a intense warping of space time then we have end state, black hole, and you don't have to muck around with the contradictions internal structures within our laws of physics. -
Mars Colonial Transporter: What will it look like?
PB666 replied to NSEP's topic in Science & Spaceflight
Dude, when haven't we had a naming discussion in which this has not come up. Be creative, how about Elon Erotica or X-pensive -
https://www.engadget.com/2016/08/24/mit-accidentally-discovered-a-cleaner-smelting-process/ Sounds like something you might want to use in space at some point.
-
-51 (-) So a portuguese cat is really say my [everything?
-
Why are the pasted threads lock but they all reference information that is grossly out-dated and needs to be revised, time to unlock those threads and get contemporary information about unity and the like.
-
No puedo escribir espanol, lo siento, solo englis. -48 (-)
-
Not on you watch que pasa. -44 (-)
-
Nope. -41 (-) Someone forgot to turn to the last page.
-
-39 (-)
-
-35 (-)
-
-33 (-), Isn't that kind of rebuilding what is normally referreed to as digging a well
-
-28 (-) Well the rules state that if there are two opposing answers, the last answer in the 1 minute slot is the valid answer, but these answers were not opposing, they simply represented an non-incremental non-change.
-
-24 (-)
-
-22 (-)
-
-32 (-) Seem like y'folk are rippen up the rug here, but seems like everything is OK.