Jump to content

SirCmpwn

Members
  • Posts

    317
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SirCmpwn

  1. I would suggest embedding an imgur album in your mod description for the time being. I'm deprecating first-class screenshots soon anyway.
  2. I will investigate, please be patient. I know there are issues with it.
  3. I will be redoing the mod creation flow during the redesign - don't worry about it.
  4. Yes, I plan on doing something like that. Good idea, I'll add that.
  5. I didn't take a screenshot of it, but there are three sections - featured, new, and top (in that order).
  6. Some pics of the redesign to show progress: https://mediacru.sh/bb96170d311f
  7. This is a beta, you know. Problems are expected and users are expected to help solve them. I don't see any errors logged, so I need to get some info from you if I'm going to fix it.
  8. Can you tell me exactly what you put into each field during mod creation? It might be best to email support@kerbalstuff.com. How recently did this happen?
  9. No, I definitely think that an explicit visual cue is needed. No, I have to have users go to a mod page to download so that the modder has a chance to give them special instructions in the description.
  10. Yeah, I'm not thrilled with it either. There need to be a clear visual cue that it's clickable though. Other suggestions?
  11. This is how tall it is on the final version: The ordering is featured, new, top.
  12. FYI, this mockup is not my work - it's the work of a friend named Chris Burns. More details around its conception will be provided when it's finalized.
  13. Sorry, the endpoint was moved: http://kerbalstuff/api/search/mod?query=fasa Only just had time to investigate.
  14. How do you feel about the redesigned look+feel? Here's a mockup. Also, you might like the GitHub integration I have planned, where a GitHub release automatically becomes a Kerbal Stuff version.
  15. Not sure why the API link is broken, I will investigate later. I'm letting API users work on the API themselves as they need more from it. HTTPS will come as soon as the naming conflict is officially settled.
  16. Design choice. I'd rather have one way to do it and more people are going to ..... about it if I remove inline album support than if I remove first-class screenshots.
  17. The mod author will be able to upload only one screenshot, and then embed as many screenshots/videos as he or she likes in the description. Hold off on the feedback for the top/new stuff until you see how it actually falls together in the final design.
  18. Probably. I'll rethink the blurb sometime before the redesign goes live.
  19. The text is correct, it's what's on the current about page.
  20. The work admins would have to perform is pretty trivial, I think.
  21. The background starfield is parallax on the actual implementation of this design. The links you've seen are just mockups. Also, regaridng the intro text, I'll revisit it but I'm not convinced it's bad. As for the top/new mods cycling in the same space, I don't like that. Carousels are the devil. I also don't currently want to invest time in a more complex system like tags over categories. Thanks for the feedback, Jim.
  22. If you have interest in helping implement these things, then we can be more concrete. I'm not going to commit to implementing things a certain way when they're further down the road than I'm comfortable with. The issue of categorization is still up for discussion, I'm not handing down a verdict yet.
  23. I imagine that the mods will remain uncategorized until assigned.
×
×
  • Create New...