Jump to content

JoseEduardo

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    856

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by JoseEduardo

  1. JoseEduardo
    ok, now all that is left is KSC switcher and RSS to be updated and I'm ready to play again
  2. JoseEduardo
    @Pak are you still working on Block II cockpit? if so, could I suggest having a node at the nose for docking ports protected by a cap (like Dragon 2)? here's what made me ask:
  3. JoseEduardo
    wait, what? when was KJR updated to 1.2? O.o
  4. JoseEduardo
    actually, last valid is @The Raging Sandwich's -36, since @Andem used the wrong signal
  5. JoseEduardo
  6. JoseEduardo
    sure, but the result is 1, not +1 (yeah, that nitpicky)
  7. JoseEduardo
    wrong signal I'm leaning towards making this the last valid: since I have no idea what this meant unless @Dman979 and @Deutherius think otherwise
  8. JoseEduardo
    are you on Steam? if so, have you set it to NONE on the BETA tab? EDIT: also, have you tried loading the game without any mod, 100% stock?
  9. JoseEduardo
    have you tried shift+delete your whole KSP folder and then install it from scratch?
  10. JoseEduardo
    I didn't update that yet, so it's not officially working in 1.2 (so far only the max diameter is broken), but.... I'm using the very same version as the last release in 1.2 right now and I have all the parts from the last SSTU release working...
  11. JoseEduardo
    when inflated, do they have twice the diameter of when deflated?
  12. JoseEduardo
    -33 (-) where the heck are the positives?
  13. JoseEduardo
    -30 (-)
  14. JoseEduardo
    there's the stock radial attachment point.... it's 1.25m wide, so it fits your DP
  15. JoseEduardo
    AFAIK you can remove it from the .cfg file
  16. JoseEduardo
    -28 (-) seems so
  17. JoseEduardo
    -28 (-) that's why you don't edit your posts in this thread kids
  18. JoseEduardo
    -30 (-) we ask the same question on the negative side... seriously, if we wanted so we could have won already...
  19. JoseEduardo
    it's not because I asked for them, but the no-cap versions look really cool btw, Mage, what if you made the endcap and the inflatable parts two separate mesh, and have the different versions managed through a config file, one "hiding" the endcaps and one "showing" them? sorta like the tanks
  20. JoseEduardo
    -30 (-)
  21. JoseEduardo
    -28 (-)
  22. JoseEduardo
    yeah, when I asked without these I also meant without the RCS and the hatch this is what I had in mind to counter the lack of RCS: using a SM to deliver the module
  23. JoseEduardo
    @Shadowmage would a version without the cylindrical section at the bottom be possible? EDIT: actually, would a separate version without both cylindrical ends be possible?
  24. JoseEduardo
    -22 (-) and the OP hasn't been updated yet... I wonder if we'll win for the 3rd time since the last OP edit
  25. JoseEduardo
    ??????????????????????????????????????????????????? @matik2002's -19 is the last valid
×
×
  • Create New...