Wintersdark

Kerbal Joint Reinforcement caused that to happen for me. Removed it, and problems went away completely.

Ah; ok. I thought selecting "Disable stock scanning" would have the ScanSAT parts wholly replace the stock parts.

@DMagic Read through the KSPedia entry - which was awesome, BTW, that's the first time I've seen the KSPedia at all; forgot all about it - but still not really sure of the resource scanning path here. I've turned off stock scanning in the settings, and I have SAR and Multispectral scanners on 97%+ orbits of Minimus, Mun, Eve and Gilly, but I have no resource data for any of them. Even with stock scanning disabled, do I need the stock scanner parts? The KSPedia isn't really clear about how resource scanning works.

That happens when KSP starts physics. In fact, that effect is exactly why KJR exists. Stock, that sudden impact can destroy complex or large ships, and KJR addresses that by applying the physics slowly, rather than slamming gravity up to full instantly.

Wave problem update: I'm now up to the 32 class 3201, after discovering some other design flaws and an overall organizational improvement that appears to full, completely and utterly eradicate the dreaded Train Wave Kraken. And that is: Heavy cars up front, to lightest in the back. It seems when you've got a lighter car in the middle, the train likes to buckle more right there (be it vertically or horizontally) then the increased weight towards the rear of the train starts increasing oscillations resulting in the near inevitable explosive disassembly of your train. With my train reorganzied that way - and larger Docking Port Sr. connectors for more rigidity - I can now turn (as fast as the train turns) while travelling at 360kph with no fear of Wave Kraken strikes. Update: So, I've made it to the crash site, recovered the 3004's crew, remembered to have my scout jet fly out and get loaded up - now we're making tracks and heading north to the pole. - - - Updated - - - I should note - this redesign also manages to pull the total part count down to 358. Still high, but there's a definite point where performance starts to fall off sharply, and it's right around 400. This gets me well below that level, and allows for excellent performance.

For MOAR FIRE! - - - Updated - - - Built a tiny jet, and a loading system to load it on to, and off of, my circumnavigation train.

Well, the 3102 met a sad end right outside of KSC: Turns out, having the structure of one central car consist of nothing but 3 girders causes a significant weakness that the wave kraken finds delicious. Still, it gave me a chance to make a couple fixes: * Moving the jets wings up a smidge, and the gear outboard so when the Inline Clampatron opens to dock, it's covers don't collide with the gear and wings * Put limits on the rotatrons for stowing the robotic arm, so it doesn't clip through itself. I then loaded up the new jet on the 3103, and made another short video to test the new recording settings: Quality is a lot more bearable here; though still pretty low-res. I've other recording apps too - better ones - but Windows' is just easier to use without setup. Sadly, I discovered another issue with stowing the arm, causing it to clip into the jet(if the jet wasn't docked and part of the same craft, it would have pushed it off the car or possibly destroyed it!), but while preventable that was user error and lesson learned. Now, off to rescue those Kerbals, this time with less destruction I hope.

Sorry for the atrocious video quality, I was experimenting with Windows 10's built in game DVR, and the "standard" setting is awful. Will adjust for High for the next time. Anyways, this is the 3102, doing a test of it's jet loading/unloading system, before heading out to rescue the stranded crew of the 3004 and attempt to circumnavigate Kerbin. The test worked out really well, except for a minor mistake stowing the robotic arm causing it to clip through itself. That's simple enough to avoid in the future, however. In a perfect world, I'd set hard caps onto the rotatrons rotation range so that can't happen, but because the scout jet uses an inline clampatron and has to be docked after launch, I wasn't very keen on reverting and adjusting. If something else goes arwy, though, I'll fix it properly. Now, time to head out and find those Kerbals!

She was marvelous, but alas I'm already rolling out the next of her line, the 3101. A horrible mishap due to my own overconfidence and poor planning - specifically, turning at the last minute into too sharp an incline causing a rollover. It created a debris field about a kilometer long, with hundreds of parts strewn across the landscape. The amazingly good news was that not a single kerbal was killed - in fact, the engine itself is still capable of moving under it's own power, but poorly, and with a pretty limited range. I put a lot of thought into crash handling and kerbal saving, and that paid off: 1) The engine uses Mark 3 parts, and is remarkably sturdy 2) The wheels are arranged with strutted girders in a fashion that, combined with the engine nacelles on the roof, allows the engine to roll without hard impacts 3) I have all couplings (docking clamps) and brakes tied to the abort key, so when the train started rolling, I was able to engage the brakes and uncouple all the cars, and push the engine's jets to full - this allowed the engine to get some distance from the extraordinarily explosive fuel cars before rolling to a stop. If not for part count issues, I'd add underslung(so out of sight) separatrons as well for extra braking during abort moments. That'd likely save cars, too, but I just can't add more parts. So, the 3101 is being launched, and will pick up the crew of the 3004 and bring them along on the ride. It's a minor class upgrade, in that I'm removing one fuel tanker and the battery car, and replacing them with a car housing a retrievable rover and a jet and stuffing the battery elsewhere. This, because I've definitely found that I'm very interested in exploring Kerbin as I go - you're totally right in that you really see the scenery in a completely different way - but while the train is an excellent means of transportation, it's not at all maneuverable and attempts to look in interesting places are fraught with peril. Having a car bringing a rover and jet that can be loaded and unloaded repeatedly will allow us to explore terrain that I could otherwise only gaze at in the distance. I'm hoping to have her set off tonight, just got to get the deployment car put together. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- With regards to the wave problem: I fought with this in my earlier models quite a bit. The solution I found was having struts to each wheel, and it made a massive difference: I could hit (with the large wheels and 2m chassis I'm using) around 50m/s before the wave kraken would eat my train. After installing the 78 (!!!!) struts I got to a reliable 100m/s before any wave kraken danger. Unfortunately, even for my rather heavily overclocked 4.5ghz i5 4690k, there's a very noticeable performance hit with that many struts. 400 parts is a lot of parts. Every wheel needs a strut, and fewer wheels lead to more issues because each wheel must bear more weight, and each suspension can only handle so much. So, while I could probably get the train going faster, the lower framerate would invite more kraken strikes (and the time slowing effect would negate the speed gains anyways) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I'm very grateful for your posts and adventures, though. I'd never have attempted this (or even remotely considered it) without them! I'm finding this a lot more entertaining and interesting that I expected it to be, with surprising engineering challenges that I hadn't anticipated. I went through the 10 (using 1.25m parts) and 20 (2m engine, 1.25m cars) class trains before settling on the 30 class I'm using now - I'd thought it would be easy to just "throw together" a train and play around with it, but that wasn't the case at all. Difficult tasks, however, are much more rewarding.

This was incredibly inspiring, so I set out to give it a try too. Here's the beast in action on my test journey: Thread: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/138030-Inspired-by-the-Elcano-challenge-and-Overland-s-trains?p=2270268#post2270268 Mine's less graceful and such, but handles 100m/s over rough terrain I'm too impatient for less. Just through my testing, though, I was incredibly surprised at just how much fun, and how challenging this is. So much of Kerbin just zips by unnoticed underneath your rockets, once you're actually on the ground in a huge train travelling at 360km/h, every little feature is so very much more important and the scenery is very, very different. I'm really looking forward to my "circumnavigation" (in as much as my train can; it's not in any way water friendly - that can wait for 1.0.5)

I decided to give land based circumnavigation a go. This won't qualify as a Elcano challenge entry directly, as it's not water friendly at all, but it's there in spirit. Now, I could make a small, speedy rover and have at it... But I've spent a lot of time in rovers. Overland's thread, and stories of his 4408's journey... a train! But, here's the thing. I have issues with efficient design. I like things big and over-engineered. Also, while I'm a fairly patient man, I'd rather not try to circumnavigate Kerbin at 24 m/s. I don't have that much free time So, then, I present to you: The 3004! 78 Infernal Robotics Hauler movatrons provide 36m/s of electric driving power, these get it up to speed for the jets to take over 8 Weasley Jet Engines, 4 front, 4 rear. These get the train up to just shy of 100m/s on level ground. 18263 units of Liquid Fuel A crew capacity of... Lots. From back to front: The 3 red and white tankers are Liquid Fuel tankers, using Procedural Parts for the tanks (to pull the train's part count down and rigidity up; it's already at some 400 parts! The final, jet equipped fuel tanker also sports a couple fins that are "deployed" to add some downforce and help counter wobble. The gold tanker is a single, huge battery (again, Procedural Parts for a single part battery) Then we have the ISRU car, featuring 4 drills, 4 large solar panels, 2 large ore containers and an ISRU module. Next, the Science car. This one features a mobile lab, full science equipment, seating for 4, and scanners. I'll be adding a BTDT scanner before officially starting, just to get my route mapped automatically. Finally, the Engine, the 3004 itself. A Mark 3 monstrousity, this carries LfOx to power a couple fuel cell arrays, some additional fuel, and a hell of a lot of Kerbals. Overall, it's very, VERY fast and quite stable. As long as speeds stay below 100m/s it's fine, and that's about how much I can get out of the 8 jet engines. Some caution is required going downhill, as it's entirely possible to get much beyond that, and with more speed there's an extremely rapidly increasing risk of a wave starting through the train, which ends up snapping the rear cars back and forth like a whip. It's controllable, if you're paying very close attention and can counter the wobble before it gets too pronounced, but as land speed increases the rate at which it gets more severe increases as well. I've taken a couple test trips out around the mountains north of KSC and back, and it's performed admirably. Tomorrow, I'm starting my journey around the world!

More than once, I've landed an ISRU ship without scanning for a good spot first, just to discover there's no ore at all where I landed. Ooops. - - - Updated - - - I do use the rest a lot in my gameplay, but I'm very excited for better contracts too. I find the contracts + career mode help provide goals when I'm not really sure what I want to do. I love me a good sandbox, but sometimes, I just don't know what to do with all that sand - either I'm sadly bereft of ideas, or I simply have too many. Contracts help in both cases: They are something to base a mission or two on when between major projects, and they also force you to plan better (get more things done in a given mission). Currently, though (even modded) the contracts can get quite tedious and often ridiculous (take ore from Eve to Gilly!) Not that I expect the changes to make them amazing, but any improvement is good.

Grasshopper main stage?

Has anyone tested this with the smaller stock radiators?

Can't you just right click the Klaw, "Target Center of Mass" then align yourself to fix that, exactly as you would with an asteroid?

Alt+ ?

Next step will be... Trying The Jool 5 ISRU Challenge with B.O.B. ! Fly safe with Valentina Interesting ship! Looks mostly stock? Do you have details about it posted anywhere?

As with the above posters, the SPH camera is broken and landing legs cannot be selected. Disabling those two utilities fixed the problems.

I had no idea the welding plugin was updated! I don't mind parts packs, but I find most include a lot of stuff I don't want for the one part I do. Also, I'm very choosy about balance - many PP's have simply better stuff, and I don't like that either. I really love the welding plugin, though - or did back in the day - because it just ensured my structure was rigid and kept the part count down without balance shenanigans.

UKS does exactly this.

What is the difference between a Ground Pylon and Ground Base?

Having fuel be consumed evenly is great, but this should respect the "NO FUEL CROSSFEED" property of decouplers. Leave it to the player to add a fuel line if they wish to bypass the no crossfeed property; that way, everyone wins. Fuel is consumed evenly, unless you don't want it to be.

Sadly, as much as I love Swiftkey for entering text overall, gaming related topics get heavily autocorrected

Running KER in career mode, so it requires a part on your craft to show up after you launch. Either add one of the two KER parts from the Science section of the part list, or go into KER's settings while in the VAB and switch to partless mode instead of career mode. Editted to remove smartphone autocorrect butchery.

With struts? Pipe and struts?