Jump to content

Mad Rocket Scientist

Members
  • Posts

    4,920
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Mad Rocket Scientist

  1. When I see the martian (soon!) I will give a shot at making a MAV replica.
  2. I think the plumes would look fine if they were brighter, but I don't think the rocket needs as much illumination as engine lighting gives it. Especially if you clip engines. I'm talking about the light casting on the rocket and/or ground when I say I think it looks weird.
  3. I see that as a very bright plume, that is lighting up the space shuttle. I think engine lighting looks like that when there's only one or two engines, and it looks great. But when it's like this: (Note: not my image) It seems washed out. ETA: I saw your edit about 00:19, and, while that much light may be realistic, it seems way to bright to be useable in KSP. Plus, I've always thought the way light is handled in KSP looks weird. I would prefer the rockets in KSP to look like the filtered video.
  4. I respectfully disagree with Engine Lighting. It looks great with one engine, but with clusters, the rocket gets complexly washed out, even though it's above the rocket.
  5. Since most of the universe is completely empty, the explosion would only be noticeable as a slight increase in the expansion of universe. I wish I had a 1280x1280 avatar.
  6. Too bad only light particles can exceed it. I wish there was a easy way to go to Laythe.
  7. The hummlebee inspired my Laythe SSTO design: There is ISRU stuff in the cargo bay, plus some life-support stuff. The SpaceY engines are on IR model rework thingys, so the can work as VTOL engines or as space engines.
  8. We've come a long way to be here today. -100 EDIT: Wait, was the above post a change in number?
×
×
  • Create New...