Jump to content

FireFaced

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    279

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by FireFaced

  1. FireFaced
    Yeah I've got both DR and JNSQ, so the effects are extra spicy. I suppose for now I just can't use NF pods lol. Thanks for looking into the issue though.
  2. FireFaced
    Visually, the parts that are exposed appear to be ablative. With a heatshield on the bottom of the pod, those sections are still exposed, and overheat during reentry. My theory is that perhaps the stock reentry model doesn't necessitate the addition of an ablator module there, but with DRE it is necessary. Perhaps I'll contact Nertea.
  3. FireFaced
    Could support for NF Spacecraft pods be added? Some of them (notably the Mk1-L 'Nereld', Mk3 'Tethys', and Mk3B 'Pandora") have segments that are exposed to heat during reentry, and visually appear to be ablators, but there is no ablator module. This causes explosion on reentry, which is less than ideal. I would contribute the patch myself but I can't for the life of me find documentation on what modules to use.
  4. FireFaced
    Shadow Box Because reasons
  5. FireFaced
    I'm feeling positive today -10 (+)
  6. FireFaced
    I have some higher quality sounds and some programming knowledge, so I could help out with improving this mod
  7. FireFaced
    Do you know if it would stay in place if I moved the bases?
  8. FireFaced
    So this happens to KerbinSide with 64K. I'm using the latest version of 64K and SigmaDimensions 0.5
  9. FireFaced
    I don't know if this has been asked before, but could you add an MM config in SigmaDimensions to adjust Kerbal Konstructs' statics?
  10. FireFaced
    @AlphaAsh What attribute in the configs for the statics controls altitude ASL?
  11. FireFaced
    One use would be to be using KScale2, and the KerbinSide buildings are offset, so using the KK editor to move them, and save those positions. EDIT: I've dug through SigmaDimensions, and there appears to be a formula I could follow to get the correct positions of the buildings.
  12. FireFaced
    Is there some way to have KK override any configs that are installed with the settings changed in the site editor thing?
  13. FireFaced
    I'm not sure. You might be on your own with that.
  14. FireFaced
    What do you mean?
  15. FireFaced
    @AlphaAsh Do you know of any 64K compatibility configs for KerbinSide?
  16. FireFaced
    How does one have MM execute math in relation to variables in configs it's editing?
  17. FireFaced
    The one from NF needs scaling, not just an offset. @sumghai, I'd be at least pleased if you could give me/us models that can easily be scaled and edited for certain needs so that I could try myself.
  18. FireFaced
    Sumghai, I was wondering if you could find a way to make SDHI compatibility packs for different 2.5m capsules, such as the one from Near Future, the one from Lithobrake Technologies, etc. Possibly use a mesh switch on the parts that change?
  19. FireFaced
    Yeah, I might just have to wait D:
  20. FireFaced
    Thanks for linking that. Right now I'm trying to tweak TweakScale (ba-dum tss) so that it can work on 1.1. But I think pellinor0 might have to do it, depends on how TweakScale decides how to make the sliders based on the parts.
  21. FireFaced
    @blowfishpro Could you direct me to the source file in B9PartSwitch that interacts with the KSP GUI?
  22. FireFaced
    Okay, I'll tell you if it's fixed or a different error comes up Appears to be fixed
  23. FireFaced
    Spoiler tag fixed, and it's KSP 1196, B9PartSwitch 1.0 (pulled latest version from dev branch on GitHub), panels pulled from B9 6.0.0
  24. FireFaced
    Now this is happening:
  25. FireFaced
    aha. Thank you
×
×
  • Create New...