JohnTomato

I'm getting "Cannot run experiment; science module full" after using the advanced materials bay on Universal Storage for the first time in a mission (I was trying to reset it). Not using [x] Science, but ScienceAlert. Any thoughts?

I feel so dumb. I disabled KJR and it works perfectly. Wheels mounted directly to the hinge or not.

Disabling autostruts on ModuleWheelBase module (using this code from a 3 y/o thread) does not work in the sense that the GUI still says "Autostruck Locked: Heaviest Part" and there's no change regarding the wheels' behaviour to hinges.

I have tried some 30 times or so, reverting to launch and to SBH. I'll submit it then. I've tried creating a CFG file in order to disable autostrut on ModuleWheelBase modules but it did not work.

My wheels have LOCKED autostrut, therefore hinges don't work. Is there any way to disable this? EDIT: Disabling KJR fixed this problem for me.

Thank you! But there's no information about KSP 1.6.1, only 1.6 or 1.7 at SpaceDock (or I couldn't find it). Nevertheless, I've had no issues using RT 1.9.2 on KSP 1.6.1 so far.

My scientist can't collect the data from SC3 Advanced Goo Unit and SC4 Advanced Material Bay. Is this intended? Can this be bypassed?

Is KSP 1.6.1 compatible with RT 1.9.2? And was it compatible with 1.9.1?

Hey guys! For some reason the parts I attached to the surface are hovering above ground... I was testing out the mod by making a Surface Science Base at Kerbin, all was good until I ran out of plugs (actually "power transfer conduits") and I made a second mission there. When I got there the parts were like in the image below. Weirdest yet, now that they are hovering I can't calibrate them, since the game thinks they are not attached anywhere. When I try something I am prompted with "This instrument must be deplayed on the surface of a planet and operated by a Kerbal while on EVA". Maybe I messed up. not sure! If anyone knows something about this, let me know, thanks!

Hello, I was wondering about the names of the versions of your mod (which are mostly of physicists, engineers and mathematicians, of course), are they chosen at random? Or you choose a certain scientist because they inspired you during the development of a mod version? I am a chemical engineering student and it's great to see names like Knudsen, Kutta, Helmholtz, Euler, Hoerner, etc. around, I find them very inspiring. Oh and congratulations for the mod! Thanks.

Alrighty, then. Thanks for the quick reply, and great mod(s) btw!

Sorry if this is a stupid question, but there's something I did not quite understand about CTT. Let's say I have CTT installed and a mod that is NOT supported. Will this mod's parts show up in the tech tree? I read the OP but I'm still not sure. Thanks!

I don't think so, every time I try to use the stock fairings it ends up looking like a p*nis. But Procedural Fairings with KWR-style texture is a good solution, no need to spend time working on the KW fairings I guess.

Unfortunately this rudeness is kind of natural, people are always inclined to hate newbies, wherever they are. I think asking people to change won't work, you just got to be polite and hope for the best. Cool YT channel you got there by the way. Anyway, this is what the author said, if everything is going as planned the mod should be updated within a week (since he posted it in April and "next month" should be May which happens to be this month).

Oh I see, thank you very much! I'm not sure if I really want the game to be super-realistic, but I do want B9 so I guess this mod is a must (or WILL be once B9 is actually updated). Anyway, thanks again! Edit: Thank you too, Camacha! Edit2: Thanks, NoPersona! (Didn't expect to get so many explanations, all of them helpful though)

Can someone explain the difference between 1.0 stock aerodynamics and FAR? I already read the FAQ but I still have no clue and I can't figure out why is everyone so happy with the new release. Thanks.

I didn't say anything about challenge, I said that RemoteTech gives me more goals to achieve. I may be the only person that plays games like this: I prefer to set my own goals, I like to feel like I am in the game's universe. Just like playing Sid Meier's Civilization games, it's awesome to build an empire as yours would be if you could have one. In KSP is the same thing, imagine how the other kerbals would react to seeing Jebediah, Bill and Bob first landing on the Mun, Minmus, etc. I don't know, it's fun for me...

Ha! Good one, ya bilge rat! Arrr!

I know that feeling. After SCANsat's dev version got updated to 1.0 I couldn't resist and I played a bit, but without RemoteTech I feel like there are no goals.

Yep, latest SCANsat and KSP versions. I see... I'll try scanning Mun and I'll edit this post with the results. If it also doesn't work, no problem, since the rest of the mod is working fine. I guess it might be just that because it always says something like "[Karbonite] (Surf) = 1.000%". Anyway, thank you for you help! Edit: Tried scanning Minmus, it worked! That means it was what you said about the abundance of Karbonite on Kerbin being very low. Thanks.

Greetings, I'm not sure my Karbonite scan is working. I'm using the KA-100 Detection Array in my satellite, its orbit around Kerbin is about 100km, no problem. But the scans are showing just grey lines, lighter than the small map background color. The big map ins't showing anything at all, only the grey background. I followed the instructions in the SCANsat tutorial and I was hoping for that cool map with the orange dots and stuff... I tried changing the configuration but I had no success. Did I do something wrong? Do I need some prior Altimetry scans or something? Except for this little issue, everything seems to be working perfectly. Thanks for the great mod btw! Edit: Altimetry seems to be working. Edit2: Every other scanning equipment seem to be working fine.