Tankman101

Whatever you want to tell me.

You did. You can refuse it all you like, but you edited your comment at some point in time to remove that statement. Most likely on the 20th of June (This month) as the edit marker makes clear. Yes yes, we get it, you like to be snarky. The wit is truly amazing.

I made a plane with FAR. Plane wouldn't take off the ground. I pushed the tailplane one degree outward. Plane suddenly flew. I don't care if you can make a rubber ducky fly, that's dumb. Yes, I'm aware of the "It's not hard because I say so" argument. As a person that used FAR, I ran into it often when searching for plane designs.

Heat sheilds are rated for Eve.

My whole life is a lie D:

Broken clocks are right twice a day

It would only be an insult if it was unfounded. Last time there was a discussion like this you said... Of COURSE you edited that out of the original post though. As for going to /kspg/ to reason with them, there is no reasoning with them. EDIT: As for mediocre arguments, "They hate it because they love it" is at the top of the charts.

The aero and heating were pretty wrong.

Various modders have said things like it's unstable and clunky. If I could remember specifics I'd tell you.

So basically they're like stalkers that want to kill someone because they won't marry them. Also the fact they liked the game to begin with is debatable, but you'll probably just link to 4chans resident squad hate area, /kspg/.

Considering that goes against everything I've heard about it in the past year, I'm still doubtful.

I can't imagine that little hack is particularly stable. Aaaand the arrogance begins.

They're obviously planning for the future, how else will future generations know that it isn't on mars!

The Dragon would bring back the experiments, the Falcon just lands on a barge.

I'd say make it. It's just one rocket, it was bound to happen eventually.

A bit easier said than done.

Except there's not much more to see, just rocks with hills at this point. I'd rather the existing planets get new geological features than new dull planets.

When a single notch of rotation on the tailplane means the difference between flying and exploding, all "It's not difficult" arguments fly out of the window.

Am I the only one missing the point of a second gas giant? Wouldn't it be functionally similar to Jool to the point of being redundant? Also clouds just get in the way.

There already is. It's called not downloading FAR and DRE. Seriously as a person that has used FAR, the current aero has nothing on it in terms of difficulty.

Reviving a month old thread to express how salty you are. I mean, that's a thing.

KSP mods are similar to Minecraft mods when a major change comes along. You kinda have to accept that the game may break the mods. Also they did give people a chance to play, like a month.

Missile Mainly because it was a missile with kerbals in it.

Because priorities?

While public bugtesting is an absolutely atrocious idea, balancing is one of those things that should be thrown to the people. There's just not enough of a sample size in QA to know how good the aero/heat would be. Also TIL: Invisible bugs means lack of QA.