Jump to content

scdr91

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    17

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by scdr91

  1. scdr91
    You are right, it is there. I must have missed it the first time I installed it. Thanks!
  2. scdr91
    Hi @cakepie! Many thanks for your mods, I´m having a blast! Just to let you know - and I'm not sure if it was intentional - but in your latest release (v0.0.4) you didn't include the Harmony library. I copied it from the previous version and it works.
  3. scdr91
    Hi all, I tried to google this but nothing came up! So, I´m using Galileo´s Planet pack and I´m struggling to find out how to compensate for the launch complex not being in the equator. I have no problem matching the orbital plane with Ceti during ascent, but I can´t figure out how to do the same with Iota! And it is driving me mad... so much delta-v lost to changing the orbital plane after circularization! I reckon is the same issue as launching from KSC in RSS so... anybody care to explain how to launch to a 0º inclination orbit from a non-equatorial launch pad to this poor soul? Thanks a lot
  4. scdr91
    ETA for that beautiful thing?
  5. scdr91
    I swear I used the search bar here... nothing showed up. Sorry man, I understand it must bother you answering the same thing over and over again.
  6. scdr91
    Hi all, I can't find anywhere in the options how to keep the navball out in map mode. Everytime I switch between vessel and map modes, the navball in map mode hides. I think this was mentioned in some devnotes back in time, maybe it was never implemented. Thank you in advance!
  7. scdr91
    Thank you so much @Galileo for keeping this updated and refining every detail with each release. It is so much appreciated!
  8. scdr91
    Make sure to follow the steps on the second post of this thread
  9. scdr91
    I'm no expert but I think you've missed the RSS-Textures folder.
  10. scdr91
    Did you guys solved the 24 hours time display? I just realised my save still uses a 24 hour clock. Those terrains look awesome! Do they have an impact on performance?
  11. scdr91
    Hi! First of all I want to congratulate @Berlin and @sDaZe for your amazing work and dedication to this mod. I love it and I wouldn't change almost anything in it. Almost. The only thing that concerns me is the recent change on the Moon orbit to the stock Mün altitude. Seeing that super Moon from Earth surface creates a feeling of irreality. I haven't seen you post the reason to change it. I think that it is a good decision to change the distance between planetary systems to match stock distances. But I also think that you shouldn't do be the same within each planetary system and that you should respect the proportions between the planets, their moons and their orbits. Even if I disagree with that change I want to iterate my love for this mod and my appreciation of your hard work
  12. scdr91
    Making an Earth-day exactly 6 hours may be the only reason I can see to modify the actual settings. I don't know if modifying the rotacional period would need to resize everything, but I think that resizing the whole system just to match the exact same size of Kerbin is pointless.
  13. scdr91
    Reinstalling FAR manually seems to have solved the issue. I still think that re-entry effects trigger quite late, when much of the heating has happened (and some RCS thrusters have alredy exploded). But it doesn't seem to have any relation with this mod so... so far so good
  14. scdr91
    Probably caused by FAR. But, in any case, without FAR, I've gotten re-entry effects from 150km orbit and 40km apo at 25k height, which is fairly later than stock, I don't know but it feels like it's harder to trigger the re-entry effects. I'm gonna try different re-entry profiles to ensure I'm getting the right re-entry effects
  15. scdr91
    I'm not getting re-entry effects on any aircraft, and I haven't seen anybody mention that... Am I the only one?
  16. scdr91
    I didn't have the math either but tried to guess with multiple launches and statistical analysis. So far I've analiced the earth-moon system. So take this numbers with caution: Low Earth Orbit (150x150km)(inclination: 28,60º): 3450 m/s GEO from LEO (2.967,8x9.967,8 km)(inclination:28.60º): 1050 m/s GEO equatorial from LEO (2.967,8x9.967,8 km)(inclination 0º): 1230 m/s Lunar Transfer: 910 m/s Lunar Capture (100x100 km)(inclination 28,60º): 225 m/s Lunar Landing: 765 m/s (not tested enough) Lunar Return: 1010 m/s (not tested enough) Now I'll download the new version Note: It's such a shame that scatterer eats up the framerate. I'd love to use it but I go from 30-50 fps to 10-15 with a very decent rig. Nevertheless, thank you so much @Berlin and @sDaZe for such an amazing mod and your dedication
  17. scdr91
    Based on the rotacional period on the info tab (which is 5h59min1sec), the altitude should be 2.967.895,353 meters. But that's just taking as true that rotacional info.
×
×
  • Create New...