Jump to content

Thomot512

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    61

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Thomot512

  1. Thomot512
    The support of GoG told me it is probably because of an incompatibility with Arch based Linux distros. Even if the 1.8.1 from GoG works on both my installs, and the 1.7.3 from Steam works on both my installs. This makes absolutely no sense.
  2. Thomot512
    Once I did: chmod +x on the install .sh file. I tried those two: (base) [thomot512@Big-Tower-Manj Desktop]$ sudo bash kerbal_space_program_1_7_3_02594_30887.sh [sudo] password for thomot512: kerbal_space_program_1_7_3_02594_30887.sh: line 14: $'\r': command not found : octal number out of range02594_30887.sh: line 15: umask: 077 kerbal_space_program_1_7_3_02594_30887.sh: line 16: $'\r': command not found kerbal_space_program_1_7_3_02594_30887.sh: line 20: $'\r': command not found kerbal_space_program_1_7_3_02594_30887.sh: line 29: $'\r': command not found kerbal_space_program_1_7_3_02594_30887.sh: line 32: $'\r': command not found kerbal_space_program_1_7_3_02594_30887.sh: line 36: syntax error near unexpected token `elif' 'erbal_space_program_1_7_3_02594_30887.sh: line 36: `elif test -x /usr/ucb/echo; then (base) [thomot512@Big-Tower-Manj Desktop]$ sudo ./kerbal_space_program_1_7_3_02594_30887.sh [sudo] password for thomot512: sudo: unable to execute ./kerbal_space_program_1_7_3_02594_30887.sh: No such file or directory Edit: I noted something weird on the last line of the first error: the name of the file is: 'erbal_space_program_1_7_3_02594_30887.sh, instead of: kerbal_space_program_1_7_3_02594_30887.sh
  3. Thomot512
    Well, I just tried to install the game with the files they sent me, and I get some error. Impossible to install the game. I tried with the 1.8.1, and there everything goes well. I tried writing them, and they try to pin this on the distros I'm using, Manjaro and RebornOS, which are both Arch based. I will keep this up to date.
  4. Thomot512
    After almost a week without any news. I received an E-Mail from the GoG support giving me direct link in order to download the .sh files. They uploaded the on a temporary FTP. That means the only way is to ask the support.
  5. Thomot512
    I was just notified that someone is looking into my issue from the support. I'll tell you what is their answer.
  6. Thomot512
    Hi everyone, I know that this question has already been asked for Windows users, but I know how to download older version of the game on windows, both with Steam and the launcher of Galaxy of Gaming. The problem is that on Linux there is no Launcher for GoG and on the website I have not managed to download the 1.7.3. (I like to play RP-1) I could do it on Steam, but on steam I do not own the extensions. I tried with Lutris, and the website. No luck so far. I asked this question on the Lutris forum last week, no answer. I just asked this question on the customer support of GoG, and still no answer. I have the feeling that this forum might be my best chance. Thanks.
  7. Thomot512
    Aw... To be honest that is really a hype killer. I'm really disappointed.
  8. Thomot512
    To be honest I think I'll buy it day one whatever happens, but I would be really disappointed if they did not improve the aerodynamic to a level near the one of Ferram Aerospace. The vanilla aerodynamic is extremely counter-intuitive. It would be a big bummer to have to wait for someone to create a mode for this when it clearly should be vanilla.
  9. Thomot512
    OMG! Thanks! One of the most useful mod!
  10. Thomot512
    Oh, sad to hear it, your engines are really beautiful. Thanks for all the work you've already done. I wish you all the best.
  11. Thomot512
    At first I really believed it was an April fool joke, but I'm starting to wonder if it isn't real. It would really be a shame.
  12. Thomot512
    I was looking at the configs files to see if I was able to understand, and I took an engine that is in RealEngines and FASA, the AJ-10 137 for comparison and took a look between the Stockalike and RO config. In the RO config for RealEngine : @mass = 0.295 (which seems consistent with the 295kg i found on the Internet for this engine) In the RO config for FASA : @mass = 0.650 In the Stockalike config for FASA : @mass = 0.385 The same with trust curve, and others. Let's be honest I really don't understand how all of this work. So sorry but no I'm not volunteering. I'm going to use the RO config and hope for the best.
  13. Thomot512
    Hi, it may be a dumb question but is Real Fuels stockalike compatible with RealEngines, because I've noticed that all the engines of the RealEngines mod are with KeroLOX, which is not correct.
  14. Thomot512
    @TheRagingIrishman Thanks a lot!
  15. Thomot512
    @Kilmeister I'm actually having the same issue, did you find any solution?
  16. Thomot512
    I also ran into the problem of having 0-1 fps then after a quick search i found out that we should run KSP in direct X 11 to insure compatibility with E.T. Have you tried that? If you don't know how to do it: - Create a shortcut of "ksp_x64.exe" - In the shortcut's properties, add -force-d3d11 to the target - Use this shortcut to play If you installed it via Steam: -Right clic on Kerbal Space Program in Steam - Properties -Define launch setting (not sure of the translation) -add -force-d3d11
  17. Thomot512
    Thanks for your advice, i've indeed access to NEBIS, my only concern is that you can borrow it for only 4 weeks and then renew the loan for 4 weeks for a maximum of 24 weeks, and since i would like to have it from now until june 2018, it seems a bit complicated, furthermore if I want to keep it as reference for further studies.
  18. Thomot512
    Hi, As a bachelor Thesis, a friend and I, would like to build a small hybrid rocket engine, that's why I'm looking for some literature that would describe: rocket nozzle theory, thermochemistry of different propellant, thermodynamic, and speaks about the different propulsion method, and of course speaks about hybrid rocket engine. I found the "Rocket Propulsion Elements" by Stutton and Biblarz, but since it cost 200$ in my country, I would like to be sure that it's the best alternative possible. Thanks in advance.
  19. Thomot512
    Here you can find a small benchmark of your card and a comparison with some other laptop graphic card: R9 M370X benchmark It doesn't seem to be a top tier graphic card.
  20. Thomot512
    Oh, sorry, I didn't know that there was such a thread. But now it's done.
  21. Thomot512
    Hi, just a small question. The LV-10-104 is 600 kg and the LV-10-37 is 54 kg, other than that both engine seems pretty close in stats and size. Is it normal ? They are configured in RealFuels-Stockalike/Stockalike_SXT.cfg just so you don't spend too much time searching for it.
  22. Thomot512
    Hi, just a small question. The LV-10-104 is 600 kg and the LV-10-37 is 54 kg, other than that both engine seems pretty close in stats and size. Is it normal ? They are configured in RealFuels-Stockalike/Stockalike_SXT.cfg just so you don't spend too much time searching for it.
  23. Thomot512
    Oh ok thanks.
  24. Thomot512
    Yes exactly.
  25. Thomot512
    Now I really feel stupid because I can't find any "Resize!" folder, neither in the "Galileo.s.Planet.Pack.v1.1.zip" file nor in Sigma Dimensions, I even searched for it in your Github repo. Once i'll understand, i'll feel so stupid...
×
×
  • Create New...