Jump to content

Ribby Kerman

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    41

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Ribby Kerman

  1. Ribby Kerman
    What version do I download for KSP 1.3.0
  2. Ribby Kerman
    Will the newest version of the mod work with KSP 1.3?
  3. Ribby Kerman
    Ok, i think i might have put it in the wrong place. I am launching ksp now and seeing what happens Woah! Those planets are awesome!!!!! Is there a mod for better timewarp to get to them in tolerable times?
  4. Ribby Kerman
    Alright, I downloaded everything. The planets are not showing up. I put everything in gamedata like any other mod
  5. Ribby Kerman
    It says I also need module manager. Is that necessary? It seems it is bundled with kopernicus
  6. Ribby Kerman
    Ok, but would the newer versions work?
  7. Ribby Kerman
    I am still on KSP 1.3.0, which version of this mod and its dependencies do I need to download?
  8. Ribby Kerman
    Ooh, Is this still active? I want to try it out. Ill design something
  9. Ribby Kerman
    This was intentional. As long as your kerbal reaches the ground alive, the rest of your ship can explode. The kerbal cannot die from hitting the ground. You will get some cred for having your entire craft intact, but this is a speed challenge so its alright as long as the kerbal lives.
  10. Ribby Kerman
    Hi everyone, I have a challenge for you all. It will be pretty specific. Your goal in this challenge is to get as fast as possible around sea level, (not over 2000 meters) using stock parts only. Rules 1. Have a screenshot of your speed below 2000 meters 2. No rocket engines, jet engines only 3. No modded parts 4. No physics mods that will make it easier to go faster 5. Your kerbals must be alive when they reach the ground. 6. No exploiting glitches That's it! Good luck to you all and happy building. For reference on my first try, I reached 1672 m/s. Will have a screenshot up soon but try to aim for above that. - Ribby Kerman
  11. Ribby Kerman
    Speeding mullet, may I use ksp beta/0.90? I dont want to lose all my progress in my game and idk if my cpu can handle 1.2. Also my current shuttle always blows up at 10,000 meters. Do you know if all the tiny wings im using could be the problem? Also, i don't have RS-25 engines at my disposal and have to use mainsails that are tilted to the right angle. Could any of these be the problem? I have conducted 5 tests that all ended with the same result. Thx in advance -Ribby Kerman
  12. Ribby Kerman
    I may try this but seeing as all my previous shuttles have failed miserably because of wings exploding it will be a challenge (I'm still in 0.90 because I'm not sure my CPU can handle 1.2 and I don't want to lose my progress). I might try the rescue one because I already have 1 broken shuttle in a lopsided orbit. Is it allowed to be in 0.90? Also can i save all my rockets and space stations and put them into a new version or do I have to start from scratch? Thanks a lot. Expect to see some of my shuttles soon. -Ribby Kerman
  13. Ribby Kerman
    Here is my ship
  14. Ribby Kerman
    K, I will post a screenshot
  15. Ribby Kerman
    I just realised that my fuel module is very unstable because of the docking ports. Can I improve this?
  16. Ribby Kerman
    thx sumghai
  17. Ribby Kerman
    I think i messed up my calculations.
  18. Ribby Kerman
    550
  19. Ribby Kerman
    Hi everyone, I have a duna mission in orbit around kerbin waiting to go to duna. Id it possible to lift off duna and get back to kerbin with one x200-32 rockomax fuel tanks and a Skipper engine and a 3 person capsule with some ladders and solar panels? If not should I use that as my command ship and launch another lander or launch an orange tank with a skipper engine and use my currreny lander. My current lander is not equipped with rcs but does have a docking port. Thx in advance -Ribby kerman
  20. Ribby Kerman
    might try
  21. Ribby Kerman
    Thx for understanding and again great job
  22. Ribby Kerman
    Hello everyone, very sorry for the delay. My computer was ruined in a power outage and would not tourn on so i had to get it repaired. Thx for your patience. Keep in mind that this was a tough descision and everyone did very well Without further ado the winners for this challenge are 1. @EpicSpaceTroll139 with his amazing A-380 that defied all odds and was able to land at the island with a passenger capacity of 644 while abiding by all the rules! 2. @Nefrums with his 747 that carried a realistic shuttle and still flew well. Very nice job at scaling down so the game does not crash wild maintaing the look. 3. @MacGamer04 with his small and sleek and elegant gulfstream G550. It is a very small, fast and accurate. Great job to all!! Thx for responsing to my first challenge. -Ribby Kerman
  23. Ribby Kerman
    Yes to tweakscale as long as it is appropriate. Yes to concepts as long as it is feasible. Good luck
  24. Ribby Kerman
    With 5 parts I can not maneuver new modules into their docking ports with no rcs. For a full rcs system I need 9 parts. Just for the rcs. I do not think it is possible to dock without rcs.
  25. Ribby Kerman
    I think I will try Duna. It is pretty easy to land in Iva because it has a respectable atmosphere. It should not be to hard. Good luck to all.
×
×
  • Create New...