Jump to content

qzgy

Members
  • Posts

    2,692
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by qzgy

  1. Easiest way (maybe) - retract the landing legs, make sure you don't break the solar panels.
  2. It should have worked. Are you by any chance running any mods?
  3. Cause you don't describe exactly or show exactly what you removed?
  4. I did. You might have done it wrong? It doen't really help if you are that vague. Like, can you show us a picture of that section?
  5. Yup! Editing the part files. Go into the gamedata folder, then Squad (or whatever mod), then parts, then engines, then the jet engine file you want. Junos are under "miniJet", wheesleys under jetEngineBasic, whiplashes under jetEngineTurbo, goliaths under jetEngineBig, and panthers under jetEngineAfterburning. Open the config file. This is the hard part. You want to find this section, in red. Its under the effects section, near the bottom of the config file. Remove it, bot not before you make a backup in case you screw anything up. Then after rebooting the game, you should find that the jet trails are gone. I've done this personally on my junos, and it dos work.
  6. Never heard of the book. I agree with @Snark - Just play the game (probably in sandbox) and learn for yourself, and ask questions if stuck.
  7. What about a 2 or 3 core sustainer cluster?
  8. Thats really clever. Oh, and this is just semantics, but a canard is something in front of the main wing. Its probably better to call this the horizontal stabilizer or something.
  9. As @sevenperforce said, it could work and could be a lot more complex. I'm just curious how we would measure stage burn out. Like, would we use some sort of fuel sensor able to detect the napalm or would we use an accelerometer to detect when thrust from the 2 side boosters cuts out? Assuming of course, that a successful deployment system is found.
  10. No, that's weird. Also, you don't have to take pictures with your phone. F1 should take a screenshot.
  11. I'm not sure. I would just launch directly through the application, and I don't have that message.
  12. Where do you live and what have you done to see that kind of stuff? Also, not all humans deserve to die a painful death....
  13. I like how smooth everything is. Nice! The X-24B replica I made wan't practical. I felt it was way too draggy.
  14. Can we stop arguing over the definition of "amateur"? It doesn't really matter IMO. Yes, we should consider not to cheap out, but we should try to make it cost effective. End of story.
  15. Oh, oops. Fixed. --- ? ? ? ? ? ? A U B I J ? T E C K L ? F W V X y ? D M H Q P ? S G R O N
  16. Yup. Perhaps that was too cruel.
  17. Sorry, let me clarify. --- ? N ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? N ? E ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? I could give you the grid without the corresponding letters... i made one up.
  18. No. Sorry. N is the second column and second row.
  19. Yes, no, maybe? Also....
  20. So about 8700 m/s net. How much is lost to drag and gravity?
×
×
  • Create New...