[WASD Controls do not work.]

I have the same problem. A quicksave/reload fixed the WASD problem, but still cannot grab ladders or enter pods. the F and B keys seem to not work. It started just after landing on the moon and using the F2 mode to take a screenshot.

i9 10900k, RTX3080, 64GB RAM

[[1.8.1 - 1.12.2] KSP Interstellar Extended 1.29.5 Release Thread]

Any recommendations on a LS mod to use with this? TAC used to work with the EC generators in the background, but it no longer does. Do people know of any of them that do work with KSPI?

 

[[1.11.x] AmpYear Main & Reserve Power Manager (v1.5.9.0) 22nd Feb 2021]

I'm getting the same NRE spam that @Apaseall is getting.

Logs --> https://www.dropbox.com/s/59apmlkzi4aeh71/AmpYear Resource NRE Log.zip?dl=0

Reproduction Steps:

1. Create a vehicle with A Drill-o-Matic and a Convert-o-Tron 250.

2. Deploy drill and start LFO conversion.

3. Wait about 15-30 seconds. The second test took longer to start spamming. It began when I highlighted a different part of the vessel.

I originally thought it was a glitch introduced by one of my many, many other add-ons, but it persists with a clean install with just AmpYear.

[[1.11] RemoteTech v1.9.9 [2020-12-19]]

@HunterForce You need to get the dev build. Any addons which change timewarp have to be fixed/recompiled.

[[1.3] kOS Scriptable Autopilot System v1.1.3.0]

Has anyone had issues with NRE spam when trying to adjust timewarp? I know other mods are having issues since 1.1.3, and I wonder if this one has the same problem.

[[1.11] RemoteTech v1.9.9 [2020-12-19]]

Getting NRE spam on 1.1.3. Same as what's happening on KAC.

(Filename:  Line: -1)

MissingMethodException: Method not found: 'TimeWarp.SetRate'.
  at RemoteTech.FlightComputer.FlightComputer.OnUpdate () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0 

  at RemoteTech.Modules.ModuleSPU.Update () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0 

 

[[1.3.0] Kerbalism v1.2.9]

@leomike Sad, but totally understandable. The power generation in KSPIe is horribly complex. Unfortunately that kills this mod for me in this playthru. I'll have to revisit it in my next one.

[[1.3.0] Kerbalism v1.2.9]

I finally got to the point in my career save where I'm landing my first mining lander and I found that the KSPIe reactors are not generating any EC in the background. Is KSPIe supported?

[[1.3.0] Kerbalism v1.2.9]

I absolutely love this mod, but I'm running into a problem that is quickly making it unplayable. The background processing does not seem to scale well with larger numbers of vessels. I have 44 flights in progress and I'm getting about a 2.5:1 slowdown. I'm not certain that it's just Kerbalism causing the problem, but I do see that the background processing loops through every part on every ship in every update. Is anyone else having similar problems, or is this just me?

[[1.1.2] Kerbal Inventory System (KIS) 1.2.12]

The second one. I haven't encountered the mass increasing bug yet. That FAR problem was due to incorrect mass calculations.

 

[[1.1.3] Procedural Parts - Parts the way you want 'em - v1.2.5 July 3]

Same issue as @TMS, also believe this is causing NRE spam for me.

Spoiler

(Filename:  Line: -1)

NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object
  at Vessel.<GetUnloadedVesselMass>m__7E6 (.ProtoPartResourceSnapshot x) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0

  at UniLinq.Enumerable.Sum[ProtoPartResourceSnapshot] (IEnumerable`1 source, System.Func`2 selector) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0

  at Vessel.GetUnloadedVesselMass () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0

  at Vessel.GetTotalMass () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0

  at Vessel.CalculatePhysicsStats () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0

  at Vessel.FixedUpdate () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0

Never mind that. NRE spam is caused by something else. Trying to trace it now.

[[1.1.2] Kerbal Inventory System (KIS) 1.2.12]

OK, thanks. I've run into this big with tweakscale and FAR recently so I was wondering if it was a problem with this addon as well. Thanks for all your hard work.

[[1.1.2] Kerbal Inventory System (KIS) 1.2.12]

Has the issue with modifying the part mass been fixed yet? Just wondering if it is still a problem.

[[1.3.0] Kerbalism v1.2.9]

7 hours ago, ShotgunNinja said:

That is a very interesting idea, I'll keep that in mind. I wanted to add something similar to TestFlight but I recon its beyond the scope of the tiny, simple malfunction mechanic so this could be an alternative to that. My only objection to it would be that if only money is necessary, then the player can just 'buy away' the mechanic. Maybe I can make them pay a small amount of research instead.

Another Idea perhaps is to cap the about they can change the lifespan based on research. Allow none at the start and then +-10% after x node and so forth. That way late game you could buy off the penalty after you've reached a point that you'll be launching decade+ missions.

[[1.1.3] Procedural Parts - Parts the way you want 'em - v1.2.5 July 3]

I compiled the changes to test on my testing install and it seems to be working fine. Still takes longer than stock to load, but that is to be expected. Nowhere near the 2-5 minute load times on simple ships I saw before.

[[1.3.0] Kerbalism v1.2.9]

Perhaps an idea for the malfunction issue would be to add a tweakable that'd increase the lifespan of a part for a cost. You could even allow the player to shorten the lifespan from default to save money too. My opinion is that it shouldn't be a 1:1 scaling however. Like 3x the cost increases the lifespan 2x, and 1/2 the cost reduces the lifespan to 1/3. It'd be nice to allow short life probes and missions to cost less, but allow longer missions to avoid malfunctions for a cost.

[[1.1.3] Procedural Parts - Parts the way you want 'em - v1.2.5 July 3]

AH, my mistake. Good fix is still good then. Thank you so much.

[[1.1.3] Procedural Parts - Parts the way you want 'em - v1.2.5 July 3]

Looks like he fixed it, then reverted the fix because it would have a bad interaction with FAR.

[[1.3.0] Kerbalism v1.2.9]

Does this release disable the signal mechanics with RemoteTech? I'll try that too.

[[1.3.0] Kerbalism v1.2.9]

Since Deep freeze was mentioned, I need to ask. Does radiation exposure still accrue when a Kerbal is frozen by this mod? It would make the freezers even more useful if it did not.

[[1.3.1] Ferram Aerospace Research: v0.15.9.1 "Liepmann" 4/2/18]

@ferram4 Looking through all the stock wings, they all use quadratic scaling. Though I agree that default assuming this is a recipe for disaster.

@pellinor I think it'd be best for everyone to make a way to return the mass scale since it can be set independent of the scale factor. Any other mods that change the mass values are at risk of this behavior. 

[[1.1.3] Procedural Parts - Parts the way you want 'em - v1.2.5 July 3]

@NathanKell Thank you for looking in to this.  I hope you can get to the bottom of this. While this is not a "required" mod for me, it makes the game much more enjoyable. This bug makes it unplayable if using a large number of procedural parts. 

[[1.3.1] Ferram Aerospace Research: v0.15.9.1 "Liepmann" 4/2/18]

@Svm420I think you hit the nail on the head. The control surfaces use free_square scale type, which sets the mass exponent to 2.  I wonder if there's a way to query the mass exponent from TweakScale at runtime?

The MassScale is a public variable, can you just check the value of massScale directly?

[[1.3.1] Ferram Aerospace Research: v0.15.9.1 "Liepmann" 4/2/18]

@Svm420 Try scaling it to 50% or less and see if it reoccurs. It did for me.

[[1.3.1] Ferram Aerospace Research: v0.15.9.1 "Liepmann" 4/2/18]

It made the problem not happen as often, but it still occurs on several parts. It seems that the heavier the part, the easier it is to cause.

Is perhaps part of the problem that the mass gets doubly subtracted since Tweakscale changes the area supported as well as change the mass?