Cassel

Anyone who offers satellite placement in orbit will also have to offer protection for this satellite, space force will be needed for that. In my opinion, it will rather be like a guard/security than the army used to attack.

Ok, that is interesting, my guess is that they will double some parts with other forces. Fix quote please, it wasn't me.

Anyone from NASA raised this issue and criticized the congress for such action? He presented the problem to the public and explained why it slows down the development of technology and that NASA wants to develop other vehicles, but someone forces such and not other solutions? Do you have any links with such statements? This "space force" is part of US Air Force and Enabling Technologies for High-speed Operable Systems project or something new?

Members of the congress are designing missions and new vehicles or are NASA employees doing it and the congress chooses one of several options prepared by NASA? In this way, NASA can prepare a space shuttle, which initially will be a good plan, but later add expansion plans that will be meaningless and the Congress will cut funds for this project. The problem with the NASA-congress relationship is that there are no aternatives for NASA projects, and the congress chooses only option 1, 2 or 3, that are prepared by agency employees. That's how it works?

Congress has developed technical plans, a estimated costs and made development plans of different technology? Congress developed shuttle plans that could not be developed further and after losing many years and resources had to abandon the project? I hope that the military will approach the development of space technologies differently and there will be no revolution, but the evolution of technology development and accessibility to them.

No problem I can talk with them. First topic how to provide astronauts on ISS without Russia's help, almost 50 years after the Americans landed on the moon. The second topic is how to design space programs, so that they can be expanded, not to announce revolutions in the research of the capsule, then space ferries, only to abandon this direction after many years and return to the capsule. Let them take an example of the development of cars or sea-going vessels, and not for every time they spend money for new revolutionary research, abandoning the technologies they already have.

In NASA everything is expensive, because NASA has no competition. If every major state introduces its cosmic armed forces, a competition will arise and that accelerates the development of space technologies. Of course, people working for NASA will criticize this idea because the times of calm salary collection and doing nothing will end.

maybe through biology? women are born with egg cells and every time they expose their organisms to radiation they risk not being able to have healthy children

many

In my opinion, it will be standardized to the same extent as seagoing ships or railway wagons where different producers make vehicles able to do same job in compatible ways.

Another copy of Falcon 9 concept?

When I pull up my planes does when I am trying to pull down It should work like that? Wings are attached to this middle part with intake, I have installed BD armory.

I have this mod with bd armory and it has by default "1000" in input, what does it mean?

I like AI for planes and ground vehicles. A small suggestion: choosing targets on the radar should be easier, as the radar detects something, the target should appear on the list where it would be easier to click on it.

We should replace the imaginary characters of men with the names of real astronauts. For 560 astronauts only 60 were female, we should honor those 500 male astronauts for their achievements.

depends on their distance from KSC

BD Armory should have build-in hostile military bases, airbase and air carrier. Some default vehicles going on patrol mode around it, it would be more fun to destroy things other people made. Maybe one friendly air carrier as air base for player would do be good too. edit: and kerbal military suits, different for pilots and for marines :-)

I think there could be few DLCs Future DLC (tech that is under way) Multiplayer DLC KerbalSim or Kerbal Duna City Builder (life support, planetary bases that needs resources to survive) Kerbal Wars (more aggressive way of exploring solar system, with AI that can attack your crafts, BD Armory, navy, lasers, shields and other fun stuff) Kerbal Expanse (discovery of another nearby solar system with new planets, player could travel between solar systems using jump gates located on the edge of current solar system on Eeloo orbit)

That is not true, someone has to give you money and that someone is making decision about what is allowed and what is not allowed (even if it is legal).

Science is censored, you can conduct research only on the topic you will receive a grant from the government.

I would suggest two vehicles. One to send people to orbit and return after mission. Second that would be space-only-vehicle, waiting for people on orbit, to send them to Moon or Mars orbit, space stations.

But this is economy and since politicians decide how much money ESA gets how you can not talk about this too? I didn't pick migrants only, I've also said about social programs. Guys, that is how it works, budget is limited, so if you spend more money on one thing, other things are going to have less money from budget. EDIT: One last word, if on forums like in here we are not allowed to talk about economy, priorities and budget spends on science and space programs, then don't be surprised those programs are getting cuts. Social programs have huge budget because non-scientific people talk about them EVERYWHERE.

http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/eu-annual-budget/2017/ "Almost €6 billion in commitments and hence around 11.3% more than in 2016 will be available to address the migration pressure and make the life of European citizens more secure. " ESA budget € 5.75 billion (2017) See the problem? Migrants and social programs are going to push only costs into space, but it won't help ESA to do same.

EU is in crisis, most of it's spending is for immigration and social programs, they don't even think about future or new technologies.

I am not from US, but I've thought that slavery is over and being employee is a matter of choice ;-)