Space Nerd

What? When I posted, I saw you posted 36+. 40- @XB-70A @qzgy

37-

After a long break, I started to work on the GPP one again! (Ceti took a lot of time to make, because of all those craters.)

Is my mun lander a valid entry (the engines touching the ground despite having landing legs part)? (I just want to be sure.)

Oh. @The Doodling AstronautCan you change my entry to this one, please? https://imgur.com/a/JAyP3xh I also changed the Mun album, can you also take a look? This is mainly to clarify that the engines touched the ground during landing (the legs compressed), but they are off the ground now after increasing the strength of the legs, is that entry still valid? (Because I changed my submision, so that entry no longer counted, but I still want to ask.) Also, can you keep my mun entry under the honorary awards part?

HELP IS HERE!!! 36-

I'm going to choose the Duna lander for the scoreboard because it has the highest score, but I will still submit the other two (not for scores, like @QF9Ewho also submitted 3 landers).

I will be a little busy until Thursday, so I'll post when I have time. I also have a minmus lander underway, but my laptop died when the lander is ~240m above the surface. (I'll probably finish that Saturday)

I think it's regular. (What's the expansion challenge?)

Wait, can I still submit my duna lander that's done two days ago for round 1? (6/1 hasn't come yet)

No, it's a new lander.

I will post new mun surface photo and a duna lander entry tomorrow. (Is the lander vibrating a stock bug? Is there anyway to fix it?)

I have a mun lander to submit! which has landing legs but the legs compressed so the engine touched the ground, does that still count? (increasing the strenth of the legs fixed that) https://imgur.com/a/n0VRnTC

What?/10

(No word) @Vanamonde

Orange rocket good. Shiny rocket bad.

18-

Just borrowed the planets by Brian Cox from the library of the high school where I will be in for 3 years starting from September!

Good point, I did not think about that.

I don't mean exposing astronauts to radiation is the point of gateway(I think it should have more radiation protaction), it's a place to pratice living in space where any resuply or rescue is at least 3 days away, while is far from 1~2 years of a mars mission, but I think it is a good practice before a mars mission.

I think this is related to using hyperedit v1.5.8 in ksp 1.9.1, and the cause of RUD is said to be a structural linkage failure, I'm going to switch to beta version when I have time.

Nope, I know gateway has these flaws but I still think it's cool. How does the radiation strength in NRHO compare to that in the Van Allen belts and interplanetary space/around mars? (Isn't the moon usually in the earth's magnetic field?) I still think high lunar orbit is a good place to learn about deep space habitation, since the challenge there is quite different from LEO.

I think it's more expensive than the other options, but the price is still acceptable for me.

(Came back from school and found I have 4 and half pages to read) I am just a teenager who don't like disagreeing with other because usually my opinion got ignored because it is too "special", so all those criticisms has been a little hard on me. (No need to say sorry to me) But anyway, you guys can debate about the usefulness of SLS, but I just want to see a cool big rocket fly, a cool lunar station been built, and humans return to the moon with different kinds of cool rockets. (Big expansive rocket and reusable big commercial rockets has different kinds of coolness.) A station in high lunar orbit is interesting to me, and I think we can practice to deal radiation for a mars mission there. (Correct me if I'm wrong.) I think SLS will only be used for the Artemis program to pave way for more permanent lunar presence of humans, which will be done with cheaper commercial rockets, and SLS is good enough for me, just like the space shuttle, which is one of my favorite rockets.

Cleck