Jump to content

derega16

Members
  • Posts

    304
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by derega16

  1. Will it have more cargo configuration than the old one? Like NFT stuff like enrich uranium Also, nice to see aardvark logo is still there
  2. Anyone have an information for RL-X? Just discover this RD-170 family reunion rocket. Atlas V core with 2 Energia's Zenith. Judging from the size should it be some sort of (relatively) low cost version of J-2X (Constellation)? It's property just random name throwing around like HG-3 but what's it should perform like? http://www.astronautix.com/a/andrewsetos.html Also an idea for SM config, cargo configuration It should doable with current revamped SM engine plate + US2 tank. Might need a kit bash for retro
  3. Tweak scale can scale it up to S-II size, mass and height are off, but should work as a temporary solution
  4. Something I want a clarify. Where does the instruments unit go on Saturn variant with no S-IVB? Is it a normal sized IU mount on top of S-II, S-ID or it is a plan for S-II sized one? I never seen a mention of bigger sized IU in any documents I read.
  5. I made triproplant fatlas with J2-SL before. so I asuume collision is actually smaller than its seems too. Also I clipping the powerhead trough the mount to make it level with F-1
  6. Just tried it, it work with SL M-1 Payload about 50t 200*200 jnsq. Should be more after AJ-260 and stretch tank even more. It can't lift off currently with those tanks setup.
  7. Will we eventually have texture variants? Like SOFI or copper. Also is it plausible to modify current S-II and S-IVB interstage to a longer version for stuff like Nuclear or M-1?
  8. I have some very cursed idea Jupiter-III but it's Saturn Extended SI-D filled with Hydrolox, single M-1 Sustainer. 4 F1 feed by 4 droptanks made of ETS Saturn MLV tanks, which each have AJ-260 at bottom. Basically a cursed version of V-4/260 Waiting for AJ-260 revamp to make this one
  9. I means one that planned to launch on Saturn 1b also if land of dedicated lander it will defeat the purpose of landing the entire S-IVB as LM-truck have far less capability to fit the equipment need for S-IVB LH2 tank space
  10. But that's means all equipment and experiment have to be cyro-proof it don't have a separate area to store them to install later like Skylab wetlab
  11. What's the point of config 2 and 4 ? It doesn't look like it can carry any meaningful payload What's the point of config 2 and 4 ? It doesn't look like it can carry any meaningful payload
  12. IIRC cobalt said he might do the later, but I have no clue on how it will be implemented. Insulated version I think maybe when revamping Saturn MLV, as a revised version change to copper S-IE and SOFI S-VIC,D instead of SOFI S-IE and painted S-VIC,D
  13. About tank length, will S-IV variants will have S-II (C-2) length? they are the same diameter just much longer. Also S-III too.
  14. I'm afraid that JFK not died timeline it is very likely that moon landing, atleast as we known, might get cancelled.
  15. "history of announcing schedules that it could not meet for prior, smaller, and simpler launch vehicles" Said Mr.Who
  16. I'm thinking about scale tile, what if the cross section of the tile is wedge or slope shape? It should have less heat spot
×
×
  • Create New...