Jump to content

derega16

Members
  • Posts

    304
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by derega16

  1. Well, I meant modular Nova with 1 or 2 F-1 second stage http://www.astronautix.com/n/nova8lmod.html
  2. Talk about Engines anyone have any information for F-1 Vac? As some early Nova proposal use F-1 second stage I don't know if it was a thing or not or they just planned to use regular F-1
  3. I have cryo tank but somehow only KNES engines have this problem
  4. Does KNES have cryogenic patch? Hydrolox engines are shown as a regular liquid fuel
  5. Any mod have 100kN ISP 450 LH2 engine? I want to make cryogenic N-1 but I can't find a substitute for RD-57. CE don't have one
  6. Johnson: Colonel, you better have a look at this radar. Colonel: What is it, son? Johnson: I don't know, sir, but it looks like a giant--
  7. Can the center part of S-II engine mount switch off? To use something like J-2T or J-2X also the 7 engines version too
  8. They might waiting to make a sacrifice to the Kraken first
  9. Is the nose look poitier than currently? I think new window config look good from the side but awkward if see from nose down
  10. Or is it possible to use SM as a 3rd stage? So, neutron will put the capsule into suborbital and the capsule do the rest
  11. Well, "We got shuttle based SLS". Because if revived Saturn or Falcon XX (and both are considered far superior design but not selected because "it can't hit 2017 development deadline") or "this thing" was selected they will be called SLS anyways. And in the report it said shuttle based SLS is the worst overall .
  12. https://www.reddit.com/r/SpaceLaunchSystem/comments/kt1vlf/rac_stuff_summary_kinda_idk_anymore/ Just read this, I swear whoever came up with RAC3 is certainly have a surname Kerman. The "real" thing will might even have J-2X 3rd stage but I found it too heavy for Delta core to lift
  13. I'd called this ULA Barbarian 70t to LKO JNSQ 18 AJ-60 6 Atlas CCB 1 Delta CBC Yes this is one of another rejected option for SLS
  14. It won't work on any DIV less than M+4 as liftoff TWR will be too low, but then performance gain is not worth it as it lost a lot of dV to loft tagetory. For atlas, it is ideal for higher orbit but not much on heavy payload to LKO because TWR is just borderline.
  15. iI swear this is the most ridiculous thing I've ever made, It turned out S-IVC is a amazing upperstage for atlas V
  16. Thing you cannot unsee I present you the rightful heir to double-Delta,tri-Atlas and MDD Barbarian , Delta IV with 6 Atlas V as boosters Bonus: Atlas V 8215 Heavy Frome here https://www.reddit.com/r/SpaceLaunchSystem/comments/kt1vlf/rac_stuff_summary_kinda_idk_anymore/ Rejected design of SLS are a helladrug
  17. I notice something about starship development, every major flight milestone seems to required a saccrifice. Like DM-1 capsule or a booster...so... SN10 will sucessfully land?
  18. I wonder what insurance rate of commercial N-1 will be if it have been done IRL
  19. 6 vac 3 sl...wait isn't that the original ITS engine configuration?
  20. It kinda like "because Titanic sank we shouldn't use ship anymore"
  21. Anyone know that the failed engine is a replaced one or not?
  22. Don't forget LM Truck and MOLEM rover http://astronautix.com/graphics/z/zlmtruck.jpg http://astronautix.com/graphics/z/zmolem.jpg
  23. Will we eventually get Big A? Basically swap conical Big G retro+maneuver module with extension module for Apollo and use the same mission+cargo module with Big G
×
×
  • Create New...