Jump to content

Spaceman.Spiff

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,858

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Spaceman.Spiff

  1. Spaceman.Spiff
    Lol im brakin the law
  2. Spaceman.Spiff
    Excuse me? What?
  3. Spaceman.Spiff
    DiabloManley
  4. Spaceman.Spiff
    Perhaps you could have two versions; One is a revamp, the other is whatever you want
  5. Spaceman.Spiff
    The problem with that is it doesn’t have the thrust to launch a decent 1.875m rocket.
  6. Spaceman.Spiff
    As has been mentioned in every thread regarding console vs PC; SQUAD DOES NOT MAKE THE CONSOLE PORT. I want to emphasize that because many have made the same argument as yourself, and I absolutely agree. Console players deserve better. However, it's out of the control of the developers at SQUAD, because they aren't producing the console updates. Effectively, the PC and console development is in parallel. I am not debating the merits of C/PC, but remember that console ports from PC also take a lot of time, and SQUAD's focus is developing the "main" version of KSP.
  7. Spaceman.Spiff
    Howdy! Welcome to the forum!
  8. Spaceman.Spiff
    post aerospike is looking epic
  9. Spaceman.Spiff
    I disagree with the notion that the shift in focus from exploration to colonization will remove some aspects of gameplay, I think it is more likely that the progression will shift towards different parts of the game. For your ISRU example, you're probably right that one, mobile, lander won't be able to refuel itself. My prediction is that for basic "Level 1" ISRU (by basic I mean fuel and maybe life support resources) to work, it will require at least smaller surface base, that would probably be temporarily occupied. That base may be able to harvest ice to produce water for electrolysis and consumption it wouldn't be very efficient, but it could fuel up a lander. It wouldn't be till much later that you would be able to produce new parts fo the base using, lets say, level 6 ISRU tech.
  10. Spaceman.Spiff
    Nope. im feeling like @Misguided Kerbal
  11. Spaceman.Spiff
    IrregularKerwoman
  12. Spaceman.Spiff
    I was thinking a static antenna since they're easier, but maybe you should look at this: you could adjust the configs pretty easily. Sizewise, it could definitely fit some of the big reflectors if you need to justify some "realism"
  13. Spaceman.Spiff
    Antennae are relatively simple to make, and the configs are easy to change. It could be a nice, easy start to modding
  14. Spaceman.Spiff
    chicken butt hueheuheheehueheehahauehauehauhhuehehaueaha
  15. Spaceman.Spiff
    Looks good. I'm not sure if the smaller bodies should have antimatter though. Maybe just the Giants.
  16. Spaceman.Spiff
    @STORMPILOTkerbalkind your avatar is a treasure; never change it.
  17. Spaceman.Spiff
    knock knock Who's there? Nope! @Nate Simpson
  18. Spaceman.Spiff
    Sounds like a feature to me!
  19. Spaceman.Spiff
    Yo. @RealKerbal3x
  20. Spaceman.Spiff
    Granted. Your brother deletes it again. I wish for pumpkins
  21. Spaceman.Spiff
    Post
  22. Spaceman.Spiff
    I enjoy your moderation abilities
  23. Spaceman.Spiff
    Granted, Mir never progressed and remained a single module, leading to no ISS for reasons I wish for less schoolwork
  24. Spaceman.Spiff
    Are you considering adding Exo resources to the rings? If you’re volunteering, Parallax configs
  25. Spaceman.Spiff
    Wow. So you did all the little mini nozzles by hand?
×
×
  • Create New...