Kryten
-
Posts
5,249 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Posts posted by Kryten
-
-
Kim Jong-Il\'s son KIm Jong-Un is going to take his place. I give them a couple of years max before shit flies and we get dragged into another war.
Like after Kim-Il-Sung died, right?
:
-
Just a note to everyone-you can now hide the UI with the F2 key.
-
What are the spiky... things?
-
All I\'m getting is an 'index.php' file.
That\'s a problem with the latest firefox update-it doesn\'t work properly with this forum software.
-
The charred spot in the picture is because I jetted a 4-tank stage when it still had a full tank at about 2km above munar surface
KSP doesn\'t change terrain textures like that; that\'s actually the shadow of Kerbin (i.e. an eclipse), which appears as a ciricle due to the limited draw distance for shadows.
-
Or binary planets that share mesospheres!
Wouldn\'t that become one planet after about 20 seconds?
Or, more likely, a few thousand.
-
The Download is broken
It\'s giving me index files that are -1 bytes ???
That\'s a firefox issue-the current fix is to use something else.
-
I did it;
Orbit:
Coming down:
Semi-powered landing:
Ran out of fuel about 20m up ;D-I could have landed that, were I a bit easier on the throttle.
-
alittle late, but cool
P.S. - You aren\'t above the atmosphere, challenge or no challenge, that probably won\'t make it as a real orbiting rocket.
He is-it stops just before 70,000 metres.
-
Thanks. But my question/challenge was whether it could be done with all standard parts?
I will try again with the standard decoupler, but I suspect it will take some precise flying to successfully achieve orbit. Maybe someone else is interested in taking on the challenge too?
It\'s been done with no decoupler at all (or parachute)-this saves enough fuel for a powered landing. I haven\'t seen it done in the latest version, but there\'s no reason to believe that it\'s now impossible, especially with the extra ~200m/s from Kerbin\'s rotation.
-
The nose parts aren\'t decouplers, though. They\'re just struts, and therefore restaging has no effect.
Sorry, I mixed up my PLF sets-for this set, you need to include at least one wall-type decoupler piece, or it simply won\'t work.
-
Wait, what? I\'m not sure I understood that. Is there supposed to be another decoupler in addition to the PLF one?
What I meant was that the \'wall\' or \'nose\' decouplers need to fire before the \'base\' decoupler, if you have one.
-
Is there a trick to getting the PLF bits to detach? When I attach the 2m cone pieces directly on the straight PLF decoupler, they don\'t come off when the decoupler is fired.
You need to put the PLF decouplers in the stage where you want them to decouple, not the decoupler that they\'re attached to.
-
Keep an eye on the mission timer. it never starts because I never hit space. Made in unmodified KSP Silisko edition 0.6.
Some clarification:
1. Only use stock parts
-
Didn\'t feel anything here in CO
That\'s 1500 miles away-of course you didn\'t.
-
my test vehicle had a roct carrer to the upper atmosther i then started the FTL and brought the power to half and no speed up from the FTL. can you fix this
sorry for bad spelling
If you put \'power to half\', the drive provides enough thrust to break the connection between it and the fuel tank.
-
I noticed that in some satellites maps. (Global 2d image with a satellites orbit path) The satellites had a squiggly line orbit over the earth, not in a straight line. How do i 'BREAK' out of a straight line orbit into a curved or crooked looking one?
This is due to the fact that a map is distorted compared to the actual planet-a straight line over a globe becomes a curved line on a map.
-
New version is now out!
How do the fairings work?
EDIT: I get it now, they just don\'t work with the inter-stages.
-
It would probably be a good idea to reduce the maximum thrust, considering anything near the max is completely unusable.
-
I mean enviromental wise. If it is habitable then who knows what the locals have done. Asteroid impact, global warming, lot\'s of things can happen.
I mean that we have no way of knowing if those things happened millions of years ago, never mind at the current time-we don\'t even know if this planet has a solid surface, never mind a habitable one-any environmental factors are completely unknown.
-
You should also remember that this was 600 years ago. Something could have happened since then.
All we know is roughly where the planet is; it isn\'t going to have left orbit in the past 600 years.
-
I think you mean Star X.
...How do you miss a star?
-
Obviously a parachute would be the method but wouldn\'t it rotate to the space vector?
Yes, it would.
-
Parts. Without cfg editing they all break/explode etc in water at a certain point. It is not possible to achieve something higher than that without cheating.
A point that has not yet been reached-and why does the stuff about hydrofoils invalidate it being tricky? And
could apply to any other challenge as well.\'It does not, however require any energy to replicate the only working design.\'
the Moulty Shedder - Celebrating the release of KSP v0.13 (100% stock)
in KSP1 The Spacecraft Exchange
Posted
Click on \'Moulty shedder\'