andrew123

Looks a lot better than my old PAK-FA. Somehow, my version has a full bomb bay over 4 tanks of fuel per engine, supermaneuvrable, but looks as ugly as sin. I should probably remake it. I need to adopt my F-15 intakes on my stealth jets.

JMSDF Nagasaki. Durable as Moses's rock. I have a variant capable of over 40 m/s, but I'm only developing the non intake skipping variant, which goes at 11 m/s. Terrible speed, but I'm bunking down for any possible intake skipping fixes in 0.90. My other variant is pretty fast and maneuverable for a warship. Sea RAM.

Doesn't mean that there's harm in trying.

They only have 800 part counts. XD

Because this is the space lounge. Deal with it. 'Slowly slips away'

With the proper techniques, you can make KSP parts into quite a militaristic craft.

...Part II!

Yup. Title says it all. Let me start: Protip: Disable annotations before playing this video. Disclaimer: I'm catholic. Of course, that probably doesn't matter now, as you already watched the fourth video. XD

That's probably a good idea. That forum has the weirdest mix of people, ranging from Ban Ki Moon to jihadists... (No, I'm not kidding). Personally, one of their users (Book) terrifies me. http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/member.php?159532-Book

Then I assume you two are familiar with MilitaryPhotos.net... Fellow expats, perhaps.

http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?236054-MPnet-Great-Flame-War-was-The-Original-Butthurt-thread The title says it all... That's an example of a forum gone down the deep end.

'cough' cruise missiles, guided missiles, aircraft carriers 'cough' I think I need to refine my advertising skills. I have a bunch of nice craft, but not much outreach. Or at least outreach in all the wrong places.

It's actually a F-15. I find warships easier to make. :P

Who's dumping one star ratings on the threads? This is ridiculous. But, cool replica. You'll get a batter shape as you play more. For example, some techniques...

Also, a new A2A missile. AMRAAM block I. Well over 10 KM battle range when launched from an airplane. NCADE variant is in the pipeline.

Derpedi derp I just upgraded some propulsion units. Sea RAM.

Moar albumz.

I mean with no intakes.

Make sure to report on the speed: I'm curious. Also, my hull design is quite different from yours.

How fast does it go without the intakes? I'm tempted to intake spam on my destroyer to see how fast it can go. I would call the Vulcan a decolonization-era bomber.

Until they get knocked off. The brits even used a WWII era torpedo.

That was the spec of my earlier cruise missile. The P-500 Bazalt on my Nagasaki does much, much more... (1 m sea skimming at 200 m/s) Also, Zekes, try removing all intakes on the bottom and see how fast it goes. Those i-beam stability supports are exposed weak spots.

That's quite a few intakes. I actually stripped the latest version of the Nagasaki of intakes, and it still works. About 20,000 m, but it mainly does sea skimming at 6 m.

That's what one of my earlier primitive cruise missiles did to the QEII. Also, I've got my own troop carrier.

Aww... But it'll give your naval doctors some on-the-field experience. ...until your hospital ship ends up like the Sheffield.