Jump to content

smunisto

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    716

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by smunisto

  1. smunisto
    I already tried it today, but I am slightly more inclined to using the rework, being inline with stock and all. So the question about the DL still stands
  2. smunisto
    When can we expect this rework to be downloadable? I'd love to try IR, but I think a future update with the reworked models will break all craft.
  3. smunisto
    Um, what's up with my chutes? https://www.dropbox.com/s/phg70ftmo15j0bt/Screenshot%202014-03-26%2008.20.16.png
  4. smunisto
    A quick question - are you pushing those updates on the spot, or you are just showing the community your progress, and you will, at a later moment, push and update with all changes?
  5. smunisto
    Asteroids are on rails, like any other object outside of rendering range. It's just that they don't make full orbits until you capture them. If an asteroid is not tracked and goes for a planet - it just disappears when it reaches it. You have to be tracking an asteroid to see it, then you have to be in its render range to actually have physics interact with it. Otherwise it will just continue on it's path and disappear.
  6. smunisto
    Where can I find this config? Is it specific to the clouds mod or you mean the general cfg?
  7. smunisto
    Any idea why the clouds are deleted each time I exit my game? Not only when I start KSP anew, but the moment I exit my career save, on the initial game menu - the clouds are gone. I have to go and click Alt+N -> Advanced(because no other options appear, not even Layer) -> Reset to Default. Then the clouds are back.
  8. smunisto
    Nazari, any ETA on when are your configs going to be updated to work with the latest releases of SmokeFX, there have been quite many changes to the plugin. I, for one, am considering removing Hotrockets until it is fixed. Dotted smoke and engine flame trail conforming to velocity trajectory, instead of to engine emission are defeating the point of having an FX mod which doesn't actually work well.
  9. smunisto
    It means that if I want to use the latest when it comes to the advancements of SmokeFX, I will have to rely on Nazari to update HotRockets...well.. And yes, with Dev 4 applied on top of the latest release of HotRockets all the effect go wild - dotted smoke on SRBs, engine fire disappears at some altitude only to reappear once you enter vacuum at 70 km, engine fire trail still conforms to velocity indicator...
  10. smunisto
    I think you people need to put your efforts together and in one thread. Smokescreen is essentially used in Hotrockets only so far. It's kinda hard to follow both topics and to understand which of the two threads to follow for updates on the mods.
  11. smunisto
    Is the Fade Out thing new? At the moment of crossing the cloud layer a large perfectly circular hole forms around my craft. I was wondering if I can disable this and if Fade out option is related to it?
  12. smunisto
    Don't think you read Eggrobin's post. This fix is from 2 days ago and the last update to HR is from the 13th of March.
  13. smunisto
    Nazari, don't know if you have seen this, but: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/71630-0-23-SmokeScreen-Extended-FX-plugin?p=1030718&viewfull=1#post1030718
  14. smunisto
    Problem with all this(or with Hotrocket's configs - not sure if the FX plugin directly affects this behaviour or it's the configs that do it) is that the flame of the engines acts as smoke - it follows velocity trajectory, rather than engine emission direction.
  15. smunisto
    I had them down to Half-Res, but I turned it back on. I will test it and edit this post with the results.
  16. smunisto
    I am using the Astronomer's pack, as suggested in your op. I was under the impression it uses 8k textures and that they shouldn't get so low-quality when compressed by the standard version of your texture compression mod.
  17. smunisto
    Same, I tried downloading it as Proot suggested it complements his HD Clouds. I wonder if there is a new version.
  18. smunisto
    Not much of a problem, maybe I just need to play more with the settings, but...my clouds look sort of low-res: https://www.dropbox.com/s/tny81nd5kyev5ol/Screenshot%202014-03-14%2008.37.47.png These are my settings: https://www.dropbox.com/s/fvrquryepgjax25/Screenshot%202014-03-15%2022.28.17.png Copied by another user.
  19. smunisto
    I have a problem - Toolbar seems to have 2 instances running. https://www.dropbox.com/s/xc46vjp9btdrnul/Screenshot%202014-03-15%2022.24.37.png I have tried searching my Game Data folder - there is just one toolbar.dll, and just one 000_Toolbar folder(aside from the secondary 000_Toolbar) in BoulderCo.
  20. smunisto
    So if I get it right - even if I download your updated Smoke plugin(which i did, and already replaced my old version), the configs from Hotrockets will still need to be edited, in order for the fix to apply?
  21. smunisto
    Hopefully Sarbian will update it today. But from what I understand - Hotrockets has to be updated with the updated version of Sarbian's plugin too. Which means it will take quite some time
  22. smunisto
    Any idea why if the smoke puffs coming from KW's engines are intentionally very scarce or it's some bug? For lack of screenshot I will describe them as follows: ^ || || = rocket || T | - engine fire | 0 0 0 0 - smoke 0
  23. smunisto
    I am considering starting a new game separately from my other save with this mod. Are there any known mod incompatibilities I should be worrying about? I use mostly plugin mods, not others, but still wondering.
  24. smunisto
    You missed the bulgarian "×ôрðòõù". Great thing indeed. First time I'm hearing about papercraft and that it can be done by software
  25. smunisto
    As people explained to you already - what you see as "new page" is not new page for many many people. Everyone uses different settings. On the contrary, for me, for example, your post is about the 20th post on page 104. And this thread is now redundant. All discussion regarding the mod can go in the fixed mods thread. Everything I've read in the last few pages is just ridiculously offtopic and I wonder why do the mods tolerate this. Each time I see it updated in my Subscriptions page I get the idea Bac9 posted something and people are talking about it. However I soon found out all that is posted is useless banter and disputes. I am reporting the thread. Hopefully I won't be alone in this and it will only be unlocked as per Bac9's request, not some 14 year old wanting to generate forum posts.
×
×
  • Create New...