dudester28

He is the kethane developer. Also, 6/10. I have seen you around.

Scott Manley managed to return to kerbin from gilly on EVA. Given, you probably don't have a parachut mod installed therefore the kerbals would be killed upon re-entry. Edit: going on what you said, I notice a possible design flaw: does a gilly lander need an ascent/descent stage? I haven't seen a picture,though, so I may be wrong.

Not to be mean but it has been established that female kerbals are not to be suggested to the developers. I am not going to say they will never implement female kerbals but perhaps the devs would prefer to receive more relevant suggestions. They are aware of the suggestion and will make the appropriate decision. I don't really care whether or not female kerbals are implemented. I think the devs said something about kerbals being asexual so I will just go with that.

10/10 you are always hanging out on this part of the forums.

Banned for banning every other poster.

I don't think this needs any more of an explanation

Clearly that fire extinguisher is not awesome enough

>y . . Error: Reality does not exist. Select new reality? [y/n] >y . . Select new reality: [a] KSP.txt Cookies.txt [c] Import a reality

01001001 00100000 01100001 01101101 00100000 01110010 01100101 01110110 01101001 01110110 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01100001 00100000 01110100 01101000 01110010 01100101 01100001 01100100 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100001 01110100 00100000 01100100 01101001 01100101 01100100 00100000 01110100 01110111 01101111 00100000 01101101 01101111 01101110 01110100 01101000 01110011 00100000 01100001 01100111 01101111 00101110 00100000 00100000 01011001 01100001 01111001 00100000 01100110 01101111 01110010 00100000 01100010 01110010 01101001 01101110 01100111 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01100100 01100101 01100001 01100100 00100000 01110011 01110100 01110101 01100110 01100110 00100000 01100010 01100001 01100011 01101011 00100000 01110100 01101111 00100000 01101100 01101001 01100110 01100101 00100001

330: Hack the intercom system...

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%3D%3D%21END%21 That's an exported save file from cookie clicker.

Banned for having no signature

Going on an 8 year voyage to Eeloo: "We needed to decrease mass for the extra Delta V so we took out the food supplies and crew commodities. Oh well, Kerbals breathe happiness and eat gravity."

I was curious about the same thing except I was afraid I would be lynched by the community for asking.

False. The user below me has minecraft.

Interestingly, people are interpreting my thread as one that is criticizing the engine. I think it's a good engine. I just made an observation.

I personally like to do a little roleplaying if I am doing stock KSP. Here's what I mean. To make things a little interesting (for me), I tend to launch missions in a logical order: General mission order: 1. Get into an orbit and back 2. Get 2 small crafts to dock in orbit 3. Launch communication satellites orbiting kerbin and mun 4. Build a space station 5. Land on the mun and get back 6. Consider interplanetary travel And the list goes on. Can anyone relate or am I just weird like this?

He probably sent up core components using command pods instead of probe cores. That happened to me on my first space station.

You definitely should get the full game. I got it some time last year and I knew I made the right choice within the first few days. Compared to some others that have played the game as long as you have, you appear to be doing quite well as many people have trouble with the rendezvous. Congratulations!

First of all, we don't even know if the "water" on laythe is even water. Anyways, I doubt the developers would intentionally spend time with such a small detail so I would bet that it is unintentional.

Maybe you misunderstood what I said. I never said I wanted to do week-long burn times. I just observed that the Ion engines produce much more thrust than in real life. If anything, perhaps there should be faster physical time warps for situations like 45 minute burn times.

If you aren't against this idea, kerbals have more than enough fuel in their EVA packs to de-orbit themselves. It depends on whether you want the kerbals to survive or not.

As long as your lander has a low center of gravity, it really isn't any harder to land on the mun. Many people oversize their rockets when landing on the mun and they do so vertically. I, too, made the same mistake until I realized just how minimalist one can actually go.

I don't really use the ion engine that often but there is something highly unrealistic about the thrust that I noticed. It is WAY too high compared to its real life counterpart. Its thrust is 0.5 kN which translates to approximately 50kg. In real life, an ion engine would have less push than a piece of paper held in one's hand. I'm not saying that KSP should modify the engine, I just realized how much more thrust it produces comparatively.

While a space plane should be able to land on eve quite easily, it would not be very efficient to use rocket power to take off like a space plane. The thing is that for descent, most people just slap on a parachute or two because it's easier that way.