John Nowak
Members-
Posts
248 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Everything posted by John Nowak
-
[Kerbalism 3.14] Kerbalism Lab Experiments Expanded
John Nowak replied to RoadWarrior9's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
Nice mod -- I've been strugling to get something along these lines working, and this scratches my long term science itch. -
That's interesting. It's certainly related to background simulation failing for some reason. There's a lot of moving parts here, and it's likely difficult to nail down what exactly is going on, but the test is fairly straightforward.
- 2,505 replies
-
- life support
- overhaul
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Good thought, but no. I'm comparing the Science produced by the same satellite in orbit around Kerbin when it is loaded and when it is in the background.
- 2,505 replies
-
- life support
- overhaul
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Yeah, I commented on that here on August 6th. Once you get the gravimetric experiment it becomes pretty obvious that background processing needs to be almost 20x as fast as it is.
- 2,505 replies
-
- life support
- overhaul
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
There seems to be a problem with Science being recorded in background. I unlocked the Gravioli detector, and put it into LKO on a satellite with enough batteries to last the night and solar cells. This isn't hard. The Gravity Scan in Low Orbit at Kerbin had gathered 0.02 Science from an earlier launch. I then loaded the satellite, and waited a day, accelerated to 100x. At the end of the day, I had 0.20 Science; so I had gathered 0.18 Science during that day. I then went to the spaceport and accelerated through a day at 1000x. At the end of that, I had a total of 0.21 Science; so in this case, allowing the experiment to run in background gathered Science at a rate about 1/18 the rate when the same vessel was loaded. I'm curious if anyone else can reproduce this.
- 2,505 replies
-
- 1
-
- life support
- overhaul
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I suspect there's something wrong, as though progress gets reset while long experiments run in the background. I'm going to add a reactor to a station soon to see if that fixes it.
- 2,505 replies
-
- life support
- overhaul
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
If you start the experiments in the VAB or launch pad they should turn on automatically.
- 2,505 replies
-
- life support
- overhaul
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Regarding unpressurized pods, the Tantares mod has a nice two-kerbal Soyuz analog. You can't spacewalk from it, but it's usable until the Mark 2 unlocks.
- 2,505 replies
-
- life support
- overhaul
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Thanks for answering about decompression. Regarding the cfg files, I noticed that the Situation Mask for Telemetry in NewExperiments is 1599. I thought the highest value for this was 63 for all Situations?
- 2,505 replies
-
- life support
- overhaul
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Not sure if I follow. If you dock an unpressurized pod to a space station, I'd expect the station to depressurize. If you undock an unpressurized pod from a space station, I'd expect the station to retain pressure. Did you type undock when you meant dock? Not to jump in, but the first thing I'd try is disabling the crossfeed on the docking port.
- 2,505 replies
-
- life support
- overhaul
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I'm enjoying the mod a lot. The new approach to Science is interesting, and a big challenge. I suspect survey contracts will need to be tweaked for short duration experiments, but that's an ongoing problem when Mod A is set up without considering Mod B, which is not always possible. Unfortunately, ScanSat and the KDex Dust Experiment mods don't seem to be supported at this time. I'm looking forward to seeing a guide on how to write the configuration files, so the community can start filling these gaps. Is there any place to upload these as they're written? Thanks,
- 2,505 replies
-
- life support
- overhaul
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I'd suggest checking out Janitor's Closet, a mod which allows you to delete individual parts from within the VAB.
- 22,566 replies
-
- totm march 2020
- mod
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
As a side note, a CME just hit a space station with six tourists, and I imagine it is playing out a bit like Gerald Brennan's Island of Clouds. Fortunately, my Reputation hasn't taken a hit, so I guess everyone is okay with it. You'd think that would generate a bit of bad press.
- 2,505 replies
-
- life support
- overhaul
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Thanks! The problem would be to keep it from turning into free science forever. I'm not sure that's a problem, though. You need to keep the scientists alive and kicking, and you need to ship experiments. Maybe every few hundred science you need to upgrade the station with a new lab.
- 2,505 replies
-
- life support
- overhaul
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I wonder if it might be interesting to simulate the sort of work being done on the ISS. Ship up a resource called "Experiments" and have a Lab turn Experiments into Science. It would need to be complicated a bit beyond that, but the basic idea would be generating a very small amount of Science over a long period of time.
- 2,505 replies
-
- life support
- overhaul
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
The out-of-box behavior of Kerbalism is that Goo, Materials Bay, and Surface Samples cannot be transmitted. I believe Labs process samples so they can be transmitted. Are you seeing something else?
- 2,505 replies
-
- life support
- overhaul
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
That would be great, although I'd suggest keeping the air if the part has "airlock" in the name. This would give those parts a bit more appeal. I've been watching Raiz Space YouTube playthrough with Kerbalism, and it's a terrific blindtest document. He missed the CRP requirement in the first episode. He also wanted a purge environment feature to deal with CO2 contamination.
- 2,505 replies
-
- 1
-
- life support
- overhaul
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
[Min KSP: 1.12.2] Mark One Laboratory Extensions (M.O.L.E.)
John Nowak replied to Angelo Kerman's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
Good news! The Fulcrum is a personal favorite of mine, and not flying it makes me sad. -
Both very cool ideas.
- 2,505 replies
-
- life support
- overhaul
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
That's a good question. The thing is, if this were my first time with Kerbalism, it might not have happened, because I would have been more careful. CRP is right in the first page under dependencies. I have no excuse and throw myself on the mercy of RTFM. I think part of what confused me is the way Kerbalism failed. I was really wondering if it was working in some different way; it's not like it said "No oxygen everyone dies LOL" right off the bat. The failure wasn't obvious.
- 2,505 replies
-
- life support
- overhaul
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
And ... I did not. Thanks! The CRP still has Game Version 1.3.1 on Spacedock, so I didn't think of that. My bad!
- 2,505 replies
-
- life support
- overhaul
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I'm seeing a problem similar to the one reported by Sturn on the last page: KSP 1.6.0, most recent version of Kerbalism, and I'm not seeing any resources applied to my capsules; no oxygen, food, or water. The science mods seem to work, however. I've used Kerbalism in earlier releases, and I've looked at the FAQ; I wonder if there might be a conflict between Kerbalism and WildBlue, or if there is some sort of toggle that's now defaulted to off that used to be on. Thanks!
- 2,505 replies
-
- life support
- overhaul
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Well, 1/8. Volume is cubed; surface area is squared.
- 2,505 replies
-
- life support
- overhaul
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with: