Jump to content

TimothyC

Members
  • Posts

    229
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by TimothyC

  1. 19 minutes ago, Drakenex said:

    Can't wait for your IUS to make a proper STS -26

    That's STS-26R, not STS-26. STS-26, more commonly referred to as STS-51-F, was a Spacelab mission.

    After NASA transitioned to the STS-[FY][Launch Site]-[Yearly Mission Count] system externally, the internal count was continued. This resulted in discontinuities as STS-10, 12, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22, & 29 were cancelled. Even though there was no STS-29 originally flown, Post Challenger, STS-29 still received an R suffix, just like all of the missions up through STS-33R and -31R (31R flew after -33R, as did -32R).

  2. 32 minutes ago, Abpilot said:

    May i ask do you only work with the American shuttle and its variants and the buran or are there plans for other craft.

    if you have added the shuttle block 2 and the shuttle block C shouldn’t you add somethings on the Russian side to make it even like the spiral project or the energia II. 

    You can build Buran, just not an Energia - Yet. Someone who has a pinned thread this month has one on the docket.

  3. 10 minutes ago, mindseyemodels said:

    is this mod in conflict with any others by any chance? because this or near future iva props breaks my game to where it crashes before the menu... i use ksp version 1.3.0 so could you tell me wats wrong and how to install it without breaking the sh!t out of my game so i believe a fix is in order perhaps? I'm not trying to be rude just needed to make it known tat something is broken with either this or near future iva

    BDB is usually only tested against the latest version of the game, or 1.3.1 at the moment.

  4. 41 minutes ago, Saltshaker said:

    While we're on the topic of Centaur, could you make the single-engined (SEC) variant? (image for reference)

    The current Inon engine mount supports both single and double engine operations. The covers that used to exist on the double engine mounts for single engine ops are not there any more, and vice versa (I should log an issue on the github for this), but you can use it for both versions. Also, the B version does fit under the Inon decoupler.

  5. 19 hours ago, DJ Reonic said:

    Anyone have a workaround for the thrust offset causing issues when using the OMS? My maneuver node target goes froggy as i progress through a burn.

    I place an octo2 on a cubic strut between the two OMS engines, and I angle it to 15 degrees. I also have an action group set up to control from this point. The goal is to have it thrust through the CoM, and have the probe lined up with the CoT.

    This goes roughly where the drogue is on the Mk2 orbiter, so I place said 'chute on probe to help hide it.

×
×
  • Create New...