Jump to content

Darnok

Members
  • Posts

    1,266
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Darnok

  1. ^ this + more rocket and jet engines for 2.5 and 3.75. More space station parts for both 2.5 and 3.75, some bigelow like parts, 3.75 processing lab. Also 2.5 and 3.75 cargo bays, so we could build service module capable to transport small objects. They are limited because that update was made in hurry, peolpe also stated it was very buggy update?
  2. IMO we need planets-editor-tool, like Devs said they are building for tech-tree, so if you don't like default you can create your own solar system or just tweak a bit one planet or moon. Depends what is fun for you.
  3. Only if we get bigger ion engines and more solar panels shapes
  4. I read Ceres have some atmosphere (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceres_%28dwarf_planet%29#Atmosphere), not substantial, but always something and maybe heat from planet core or from gravitational tides, so temperature could be above 0ºC from time to time.
  5. Nobody thinks it can be liquid water? o_O
  6. This one glowing spot looks like photoshoped and it is glowing even being on "dark side". Other spots are white only when they are illuminated... it can be liquid water? I would love to see this in color. Or maybe someone forgot to turn off flash on camera?
  7. For free? Does that means Mac users can download it for free?
  8. Larger than 300 people sample? And from what I read they didn't used phones just simulated radiation. Seems like some people are ignorant and can only insult others even after their own mistake is proven Bye
  9. Would be nice if you would do same thing... you posted link where I was able to find same information about "DNA damaged by cell phones" as in one of many sites found on list posted by Sirrobert. Here are brain cancer studies http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/pr/2011/pdfs/pr208_E.pdf also false? You shouldn't post things like that, since you didn't even read your own links.
  10. Studies I read and quote said about few groups size 20-300 people using cell phones for 6+ days constantly, so that is not in vitro or small animal experiment Interesting your first link confirms what I am saying: and second is super short, did I missed something?
  11. What are you? Stop using TV for science, I know they are saying cell phones are good, but that isn't true Just scroll down http://www.ewg.org/cell-phone-radiation-damages-sperm-studies-find and you will see table with different experiments on different groups sizes etc etc. If you got objections blame Sirrobert not me, he posted this as "scientific proof" against my statements. Now you should back up your statements with some links, show me research that is denying data from that site. WHO data http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/pr/2011/pdfs/pr208_E.pdf for some group using cell phones cause brain cancer. They are still making research because they blame radio frequency. Now where are your links?
  12. I did thank to Sirrobert, he posted wiki site with lots of research about this and I found experiments on humans that are saying same thing I posted about rats. Cell phones are affecting cells of our body. Just look up "willfully ignorant" and read some post from this page
  13. While I doubt it cell phones can cause in short time terrifying brain cancer... this one thing bothers me If it can decrease cells production if you put cell phone on your belt, then it is possible that using phone (talking) for very long time and very often can do exactly same thing with brain cells. Decrease neurons reaction time, decrease neurons ability to create new connections or even destroy connections between neurons. So it would affect out memory, it's capacity and sustainability (how long we can remember things) and ability to learn faster? I hope someone will do some research about this in future. Going to build some rockets, it was nice to make some science
  14. Did you read anything from that list? Random link from wiki site you posted http://www.ewg.org/cell-phone-radiation-damages-sperm-studies-find Thank you for proof of things I said... it does affecting children after all.
  15. Show me those research I can, because it hasn't changed at all... as long as technology is profitable it is used on global scale because nobody cares about life. Corporations cares about money and common office slave cares about convenience and job more than about his life. If in 1920 neighbor would discover you are posisoning him or his children he would start to shoot at you, but today people don't care about their kids life, more value have modern phone, TV and admiration of friends. I blame corporations and human greed. Show me links not your words. From your post I can only say microwaves, radio waves, radiation are safe separately, but on the basis of this information you can not be assume that after the closure of 50 people on one floor of a skyscraper amount and strength of the various impacts will continue to be not harmful. Anyone ever did research on iphones or any other smartphone like that? And how it will affect people (and their kids) after 20 years of work in that office? Are those people beyond the reach of the radiation, from phones of people that use them, and masts transmitting and reciving signals from phones?
  16. Where is control group for studies showing that cell phones are safe?
  17. I have no idea Leaded-fuel bans for road vehicles came into effect as follows: Canada: 1993 USA: 1 January 1996 California: 1992 EU: 1 January 2000 - - - Updated - - - No you messed this one, that is not science that is mistake. He is saying something else listen again and I gave you this because you were looking for harmful effect pre deciding it has to be brain cancer.
  18. I like part when he is saying we shouldn't pre decide what we are looking for, just observe to find out more about it. That is scientific way of thinking.
  19. You missed the point, if it can kill 25% of cells, how it will affect 75% of cells that didn't died? Does next generations of rats are going to have cancer? That would be real harm or not? Use google maybe you will find that PDF file
  20. Evidence like what? http://www.cnet.com/news/report-cell-phone-use-could-reduce-sperm-count/
  21. Yes, one person is asking questions like I did in one post... and second is looking for answers You have statements from cell phone manufacturer it can be harmful if you are using it for too long. Now tell me why fuel with lead and freons where ever released on world wide markets? - - - Updated - - - Who told you it has to be brain cancer? Did you missed my links?
×
×
  • Create New...