r4pt0r

http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/115139-KSP_x64-exe-missing-Re-install-won-t-solve-it Well here comes the storm. would really like a dev to hop online and explain what is going on.

They just updated it and removed the 64bit, take a peek in the general discussion board. We dont know why yet.

In the words of Lord Hood, from the game Halo, "For what purpose, Master Chief?" Why do this now? are there not players who depend on the 64bit to play their current saves? I'm sure that there are at least a few who wanted not update to 1.0 and to stick with .90 specifically because of the 64bit option.

7 warnings and 7 infractions for me. my first was, incidentally, a warning for Backseat moderation. me saying "inb4 lock" was mis-interpreted as backseat moderation.

well I see it like this. Ace combat is more game than flight sim. IL-2 is more flight sim than game. With 1.0 I think KSP will tip into being more simulator (the addition of reentry heat, and the revision of aerodynamics)

Ah, well in that case I just need to come clean. I've gotten many infractions and warnings for many somethings. Edit: ok, I laughed at "frontseat moderate". caught me off guard

http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/108936-KSP-game-or-simulator semi-relevant

I believe mentioning your infraction falls under rule 3.4, "Open discussion of staff decisions". I know that you are not supposed to discuss infractions and warnings because I have received a warning for posting a thread contesting an infraction I received. Oh drat, now I've gone and done it too. (I was being ironic, be gentle mods)

Applebee'sâ„¢

hey bud, we are here for you.

the rush he is refering to is going to 1.0 after only 1 beta cycle. the game was alpha for 3 or 4 years, and after 4 months of 1 beta update its jumping to 1.0? Quite a few think its way too quick to jump that far: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/108318-Do-you-feel-KSP-is-ready-for-1-0 at the least I think this should be .99, and 1.0 can be the final bug fix/tweak update. All these features they are adding to this update might need to be rebalanced anyway. QA and experimentals are not perfect anyway.

I completely restart every update

Actually, the end of the techtree is the end of the tutorial, not an 'end goal' itself. Thats why there is a tech tree, to introduce players to parts slowly. The have stated that this is the intention.

That fixed it, many thanks. been stuck on full site on my phone for the past month

I was on break at work, viewing the forums to pass the time, and noticed that I could not see any poll results. So I went to the bottom of the page and clicked view full page, and that let me see the poll I wanted. But now I am still stuck in full site mode, which is not optimal on my tiny phone screen. How can I switch back to the mobile version?

refresh me on the release process again. experimentals is after all the main work(new features, bugfixes, ect...) making sure that all the changes when put together dont cause any new bugs right? and QA comes just before that, and that is making sure the new features and such all work as intended?

Hope by next weekend, as I will be free from work for the next few months. but we arent supposed to ask.

do you recommend that?

I've had 1 hobbygrade RC heli, a Blade CX2. My area of expertise is fixed wing planes though.

see for me, already knowing I can make it isn't fun. My favorite mission was my first successful manned Ike return, watching the fuel units tick down and hoping id make it. hit kerbin with less than 2 units of fuel. all that off of just winging it, no math or junk, just built a ship that looked good enough and went.

the challenge is getting from kerbin to XXXXXX and back. nothing will make that easier than being able to fuel up at your destination. Also with current tech it is still impractical/ and a bit less than feasible. But maybe I am an oddball, I am also vehemently against adding dv counters too, among other things that probably would upset people if I said them here lol.

hey, Just re-read the OP, are the scan lines to show Ore still a thing? I thought that Squad opted out of that, and went with dots instead? or do i remember that backwards?

no 1.0 has it, we are getting "ore". you refine that into fuel presumably. I dont think ore is the best name, but it doesnt matter to me since I dont think resources make sense from a gameplay perspective.

The ticket scalpers in the 1.0 hype thread weren't exactly asking for users ages. I suspect little Timmy and Sarah will have to hand over their piggy-banks to the nice train man.

uh what? I never used 64-bit myself, so it makes no matter to me, but aren't there hundreds of people clamoring for that? Is this confirmed? EDIT: oh right, I forgot because it was 2 months ago lol http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/content/328-The-future-of-Windows-64-bit-builds-for-KSP