Jump to content

WDZOrangeJuice

Members
  • Posts

    35
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

1 Neutral

Profile Information

  • About me
    Rocketeer

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. That's what I thought after I posted; I realized how many mods I had that weren't updated. So I guess it's just my KSP then, not B9. Outside docking though, part actions work fine. I can still transfer fuel between crafts and such. Also, I never knew running KSP in Program Files wouldn't be recommended. Another thing is that I know that Steam updates regardless of incompatible mods, it is just my fault for not updating all of my mods (since I started building my station between 1.1.2 and 1.1.3. Sorry for causing all this trouble, I should've known better.
  2. https://www.dropbox.com/s/b3d1ruc51vex3nc/output_log.txt?dl=0 My bad, I gave you the wrong log I guess.
  3. The undock action only appears on the CDP docking port. But after attempting the action, the craft remains docked and I no longer have the action to undock.
  4. The undock action only appears for the CDP port. I was able to load a quick save file that put me before I attempted to undock, however I received the same results.
  5. KSP: 1.1.3 Windows 64bit Problem: S2 Docking Port does not undock after asking it to undock Mods Installed: B9 Aerospace, DistantObject, DMagicOrbitalScience, EnvironmentalVisualEnhancements, FuelTanksPlus, HeatControl, InterstellarFuelSwitch, JSI, KerbalConstructionTime, KerbalEngineer, KerbalJointReinforcement, KWRocketry, NearFutureConstruction, NearFutureElectrical, NearFuturePropulsion, NearFutureSolar, PlanetaryBaseInc, PlanetShine, ProceduralFairings, ProceduralParts, RealChute, RealPlume, RLA Stockalike, SDHI, SmokeScreen, StageRecovery, StationPartsExpansion, StationScience, Tantares, TextureReplacer, Trajectories, TweakScale Reproduction Steps: Dock a craft using an S2 Docking Port with another craft (using any other docking port). Attempt to undock afterwards. Log: https://www.dropbox.com/s/k4nbmk3vu8vmtg7/output_log.txt?dl=0
  6. I'm not sure if it is the compatibility issue with the pack or if it a bug in the pack itself, but once the centrifuge part starts spinning, the centrifuge cannot be boarded (it will say that the centrifuge is full).
  7. I used a different antennae (the V-RE "Needle" Rendezvous Antenna), and it was able to work, so I don't know what is going on. Also, I deleted parts of the pack (the ones I won't use) so my catalog isn't cluttered, resulting in the antennae that worked to not have a texture, but when I had the full mod pack, the antennas (with the exception with the V-RE) didn't want to extend both in the VAB and in-flight.
  8. I don't know if this is solved, but whenever I try to extend the Soyuz's satellite dish, it wouldn't extend (in VAB). I did it manually (outside VAB) and the option isn't there, so I don't know if it is a plugin interfering with it or something else is happening.
  9. I came across a bug, and I think KJR is the culprit for it. So the bug involves the docking ports, and when I stick it to a surface and press "Decouple", it would still stick and I can't really do anything.
  10. It is the same craft as before, but I don't think it should be affected since it's a saved craft.
  11. So I took a look at the .cfg file for the docking port parachutes and found the values in which they should fully deploy (700 m it says), and in game it changes to 2000 m, and since I would be too fast to deploy the drogue parachutes to deploy, the main parachutes would take over and after predeploying, they would fully deploy in <2 seconds, going from ~200 m/s to ~6 m/s (and g-force going to the red zone). Is something conflicting with the SDHI pack to cause this issue?
  12. Well, before the 0.90.0 update the parachutes were working fine (basically like a normal parachute with RealChutes installed) but the main parachutes keeps deploying in an instant at 2500 m off the ground.
  13. From the article I read about (http://www.dvice.com/2013-9-23/nasa-will-pay-you-18000-stay-bed-70-days), NASA wants people to lay in bed for 70 days. And they pay you $18k in doing so. Also here's another link for the experience of doing the experiment: http://www.vice.com/read/nasa-patient-8179-100
×
×
  • Create New...