SpenSpaceCorp

The ultimate question we have been asking ourselves for centuries! Yes, or No? Based off of CollegeHumor's video:

While I agree it should not be super realistic (real sizes, real fuels, real engines, etc.) I would enjoy some real features such as improved aerodynamics, or some sort of life support system.

I find that the gizmos take a lot of frustration and time out of what is essentially the same end result.

Wait never mind, I got it now! It turns out I was not precise enough haha! anyway, Merry Christmas everyone!

Hello everyone, I recently started my 0.90 career save, and my visual survey contracts seem to not work for the EVA portion. The contract requires 2 EVA reports from 2 sites, and a low flying crew report at a third site. So on the surface of either of the EVA sites, I take EVA reports on the surface, but nothing seems to register or confirm my completion of the requirement. Am I misunderstanding the contract/how it works, or is it not working properly?

I am really tempted to really put the "planeception" to the task, and build an SSTO using the new Mk. 3 cargo bays to transfer a Mk. 2 SSTO to orbit. this Mk. 2 craft would be a single stage to Duna's surface. within the Mk. 2's cargo bay, a single stage to Duna or Ike orbit and back to the surface would commence. that craft would land back in the Duna Mk. 2 on the surface, which would return to Kerbin orbit, dock inside the Mk. 3 SSTO cargo bay, and the whole thing land at KSC!!!

So today after my Bio final, I excitedly checked the KSP website, and much to my excitement, 0.90 was out! so I hurridly began downloading, unzipped, and thought "something isn't right, I already have a 0.25 install..." After a few derpy minutes of trying to figure out what was going on, it dawned on me that I had accidentally downloaded version 0.25 and not 0.90 ! Finals... they wear down your brain haha

I have been trying to break free from the evil clutches that are finals! I will tell my story quick as my nemesis Mr. Study is searching for me as I write this! I was about to board the Hypetrain, ticket and luggage in hand, when suddenly finals initiated its diabolical scheme across the nations, searching eagerly for helpless students to prey upon. I am just one of the many who has fallen into this situation, but lucky enough to temporarily escape it. Ahhh! Mr. Study has found me again and is already pulling me from my freedom!! Hype on, my friends! hype on...

In your settings try turning down aerodynamic effects. If that doesn't work, do a test and look up (away from the planet) and if you see improved frame rate from looking up, the ocean (or terrain) may be lagging you, which you can configure in the settings config file.

Thank you for the input! I will whip up another version!

Yes I did thank you!

SSA stands for SpenCorp Space Agency haha

Hello everyone, I recently completely remade my flag (my old one seen in the bottom left corner of my sig), and I need some input on which of the two versions looks better. I would love to hear your input on this! Version 1:Version 2: Version 3:Version 4: Note: the white background is actually transparent.

Canada eh! I am a hurtin' Albertan!

I do believe it is in fact analogous to Europa, "The physical characteristics of Eeloo are most likely an analogue of the ice moon Europa" http://wiki.kerbalspaceprogram.com/wiki/Eeloo

Welcome aboard fellow Canadian!! Albertan here, eh! (Sorry could not resist haha). Its so cold here righ tnow I may just build myself a rocket and fly to moho!

Well, This is my successful attempt: Total Mission Time: 0h, 46 min, 55s. Highest Altitude Acheived: 24,693m Highest Speed Over Land: 1,782m/s Total Distance Traveled: 59,422m I can provide more pics/craft file if anyone wants.

I tend to disagree with the idea that individual Kerbals can affect part performance. I do however agree with for example, more science gains, or say in an alternate future, part repairability etc. In my opinion, changing the part performance transfers some of the piloting skills from the player to the game. Although this may appeal to some, I like the fact that the player controls the Kerbals completely, without a small portion of that being taken out of the players' hands.

It may be the structural panels located so close to the hatches. Even if they are not clipped through, they can often "obstruct" even when they obviously look clear (I had a very similar issue). Try removing objects progressively to find it out. Ex: try removing the panels and see if it is no longer obstructed.

In terms of parts being doubled, that happened to me, so I just downloaded it form the website (which was relatively slower) but got the job done correctly.

Thank you eh! You are also welcome! And thank you for letting me post, eh. And thank you Squad/a great team for a great game eh! And thank you forum dwellers for the support of KSP eh! And thank you moderators for keeping bad forum dwellers in line eh! And sorry if I took up too much room for this post eh, but thanks eh!

YO DAWG I hear you like cargo bays so I put a cargo bay in yo cargo bay so you can transport while you transport!

We were at the beach Everybody had matching towels Somebody went under a dock And there they saw a rocket It wasn't a rocket Was a rocket lobster

Thanks! Also, heres an update: I am currently undergoing an attempt to circumnavigate Kerbin in that ol' DC-3

Thanks! by the way, I am currently modifying my B-17 Flying Fortress replica to drop a fuel rover next to the DC-3 when it runs out of fuel (again) on the return trip lol. Then I need to think of a way to get the 747 crew back... and I did try shutting off the opposite engine, but 2 engines is not enough to take off. 3 is barely enough to keep the behemoth level, but not climb, at least not at a sane rate.