Jump to content

[1.2.x] [1.4 in Development] Real KSC in KSP Dev Continued

Tristonwilson12

By Tristonwilson12
in KSP1 Mod Development

 Share

Modern or Historical pads?  

246 members have voted

  1. 1. Modern/Future or Historical pads first

    • Modern/Future
      150
    • Historical
      96

Recommended Posts

_Augustus_

_Augustus_

Posted
Posted
Oh I think I know what it is. I think I put the shuttle cockpit in it during tests, and if you dont have the shuttle interior it will skybok on you. I forgot to remove it.

Can you comment out or delete the 'intetnal' section in the cfg

- - - Updated - - -

Was going to make interior for it for a kerbal to drive. But will fix tonight

Everything is fixed! Thanks!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mike-NZ

Mike-NZ

Posted
Posted

Ok see ya.

I have been planning...

I will need the right type of launchpad for this, but I intend for the wheels of the crawler to raise and lower on infernal robotics, and make the top pad decouple.

So....

Drive to the launch site.

Decouple the pad.

Lower wheels down.

Pad rests in the launch sites colliders.

Crawler drives away leaving pad in place.

Return to collect the pad after launch. Or push it off into the ocean with the rest of them because lazy.

Profit.

Cool?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
liquidhype

liquidhype

Posted
Posted

Ah Ares I-X is one of the coolest rockets ever. And yes, please do model those :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
liquidhype

liquidhype

Posted
Posted
Just checking in...... I WANT ARES 1-X that little thing is amazingly a failed idea.. But who cares

It was by no means a failed idea. The constellation project (which would have included Ares-I and Ares V) got cancelled because of Bush :) Budgetary reasons basically. The consept was amazingly simple and also cost-efficient.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
liquidhype

liquidhype

Posted
Posted
I meant the mission.... How the mission failed kinda

There was never a mission, as they never got that far into the development cycle. They had one test flight of Ares I, known as Ares I-X which was very successful. It was a first stage test with dummy 5th segment on the booster and dummy upperstage and capsule. It reached a 25 mile altitude and did a separation test. After that, the project got cancelled. Booo Bush and congress (=

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tristonwilson12

Tristonwilson12

Posted
  • Author
Posted
There was never a mission, as they never got that far into the development cycle. They had one test flight of Ares I, known as Ares I-X which was very successful. It was a first stage test with dummy 5th segment on the booster and dummy upperstage and capsule. It reached a 25 mile altitude and did a separation test. After that, the project got cancelled. Booo Bush and congress (=

Lol booo

- - - Updated - - -

So was it basically just to test the SRB??

Link to comment
Share on other sites
sp1989

sp1989

Posted
Posted

You do all realize that with the exception of the Ares-1 the SLS program is essentially the Constellation program. Honestly many people are skeptical about the SLS I however really do believe in it. I mean I have had the NASA Kool-Aid hundreds of times over. I am a true fan boy. However the SLS program is essentially the same program. The goal with the SLS is an eventual voyage to Mars. Although cool looking placing a manned capsule on top of a SRB was crazy. I can't honestly imagine sitting on top of a SRB. But the capsule that was supposed to go on top was the Orion and they are way to far into developing that to just cancel it. Constellation=SLS different name with alot of changes, and longer timeline still the same end game with with essentially the same means.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...