Jump to content

The Outer Planets Traveling Circus Episode 28: Superheroes (The End)


Geschosskopf

Recommended Posts

  On 3/14/2016 at 1:51 PM, Just Jim said:

Isn't it funny how you set out to write one thing, and it sort of evolves on it's own into something completely different? 
Sci-Fi trope indeed.... I'm beginning to wonder if these stories themselves taking on lives of their own isn't one as well...  :wink:

Expand  

That's what happens when you introduce fallable characters.  The best planning and engineering in the world comes unglued when somebody does something stupid.  So I'm quite conflicted here.  In my real life, both as an engineer and the training officer of a fire department, I abhor stupidity because it wrecks equipment and gets people killed.  My real life is thus a constant battle against stupidity, not only trying to beat it out of my own troops but also dealing with the often tragic aftermath of civilian stupidity.  It's thus practically anathema to me to allow my characters to be stupid.  I only hire shanghai Kerbals with the lowest stupidity ratings.

But as an avid reader, I know that ripping yarns only come about due to stupidity somewhere along the line.  And regardless of how non-stupid I try to make my troops, I realize we'd all be out of a job if it wasn't for the abundance of stupidity found in the general population.  So I must accept the continued existence of stupidity in the world and large, and that my Kerbals realistically should do stupid things.  But I don't like that.  I suppose it's because, deep down, I find it somehow hypocritical.  If I tolerate any stupidity at all in imaginary Kerbals, over whom I have complete, total, god-like control, how I can I in good conscience be totally intolerate of stupidity in my troops, over whom I have only limited control?  This is why I'm not a writer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/14/2016 at 2:58 PM, Geschosskopf said:

That's what happens when you introduce fallable characters.  The best planning and engineering in the world comes unglued when somebody does something stupid.  So I'm quite conflicted here.  In my real life, both as an engineer and the training officer of a fire department, I abhor stupidity because it wrecks equipment and gets people killed.  My real life is thus a constant battle against stupidity, not only trying to beat it out of my own troops but also dealing with the often tragic aftermath of civilian stupidity.  It's thus practically anathema to me to allow my characters to be stupid.  I only hire shanghai Kerbals with the lowest stupidity ratings.

But as an avid reader, I know that ripping yarns only come about due to stupidity somewhere along the line.  And regardless of how non-stupid I try to make my troops, I realize we'd all be out of a job if it wasn't for the abundance of stupidity found in the general population.  So I must accept the continued existence of stupidity in the world and large, and that my Kerbals realistically should do stupid things.  But I don't like that.  I suppose it's because, deep down, I find it somehow hypocritical.  If I tolerate any stupidity at all in imaginary Kerbals, over whom I have complete, total, god-like control, how I can I in good conscience be totally intolerate of stupidity in my troops, over whom I have only limited control?  This is why I'm not a writer.

Expand  

I hear ya perfectly!  I've found it kind of weird writing about someone, or something, that would be so out of character, no pun intended, with what I would do myself.  It is a little tricky trying to write characters so they don't all act and sound like I would in real life, and I've found myself falling into that trap already more than once.

Edited by Just Jim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/14/2016 at 2:58 PM, Geschosskopf said:

If I tolerate any stupidity at all in imaginary Kerbals, over whom I have complete, total, god-like control, how I can I in good conscience be totally intolerate of stupidity in my troops, over whom I have only limited control?  This is why I'm not a writer.

Expand  

This dilemma reminds me of one faced by legendary comic artist/writer Steve Ditko, who along with Stan Lee created Spider-Man and (Kuzzter's personal fave!) Doctor Strange. Ditko was (and is, last I heard) an objectivist, who believes that the sole moral purpose of life is rational self-interest. But Ditko's Marvel characters are not what we would call objectivist heroes in the mold of Howard Roark. In fact, Spider-Man is exactly the opposite: a hero who believes above all else that "with great power comes great responsibility". Which is why Peter Parker's life is so completely miserable most of the time--no good deed he ever does goes unpunished! 

Contrast this with Ditko's somewhat lesser-known (OK, pretty much completely ignored) comics work after leaving Marvel. Mr. A believes in only good or evil, nothing in between. If you're good, you'd better be 100% good--because otherwise, Mr. A will drop you off a building. If you haven't heard of this guy you may have seen him re-imagined in The Watchmen as Rorschach.

So you could go either route--the first one, where characters don't follow your personal philosophy (and get punished for it), or the second, where they do. I think you've already decided that the second route doesn't make for as interesting a story. It certainly did not in the case of Steve Ditko. :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/14/2016 at 3:12 PM, Just Jim said:

It is a little tricky trying to write characters so they don't all act and sound like I would in real life, ....

Expand  

I don't have that problem so much because I wouldn't get into their situations to begin with :)  So first I have to make some different being who WOULD get into that situation, and therefore isn't much like me.  And I have great difficulty imagining a mind so alien  Which is why I relied on the d10s of Doom to create them for this yarn :)

  On 3/14/2016 at 4:47 PM, Kuzzter said:

Contrast this with Ditko's somewhat lesser-known (OK, pretty much completely ignored) comics work after leaving Marvel. Mr. A believes in only good or evil, nothing in between. If you're good, you'd better be 100% good--because otherwise, Mr. A will drop you off a building. If you haven't heard of this guy you may have seen him re-imagined in The Watchmen as Rorschach.

Expand  

Alas, poor Rorschach!  I identified with him too well.  Not an admirable guy overall, although with a few admirable qualities, especially that of being true to himself to the bitter end.

And that's more "Hamlet" overtones than I need in my day :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/18/2016 at 1:36 PM, KAL 9000 said:

GRATUITOUS EXPLOSIONS!!! YAY!!!

Expand  

Well, sadly, nothing explodes but a few minds in this episode.  I must be losing my touch.  Anyway...

EPISODE 24: Living Dead Girl

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Edited by Geschosskopf
add spoiler
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/20/2016 at 9:10 PM, Geschosskopf said:

Also, thanks to all the readers.  This thread is up to over 9000 views.  OT1H, I'm flattered that this drivel has attracted so much attention.  OTOH, I feel quite guilty for wasting part of all your lives with said drivel.  But OTGH (ask @FyunchClick where that comes from), my evil plan all along has been to suck out your psyches through this drivel, so I'm feeling rather repleat just about now :cool:..

Expand  

One is forced to admit that we must all be partial to a bit of quality psyche-sucking drivel, then... :D

I'll be amazed if any of this crew makes it home. Nice view to admire for the rest of eternity though, if they don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/20/2016 at 10:02 PM, UnusualAttitude said:

One is forced to admit that we must all be partial to a bit of quality psyche-sucking drivel, then... :D

Expand  

I believe Hulu had a whole advertising campaign based on that premise :)

  32 minutes ago, UnusualAttitude said:

I'll be amazed if any of this crew makes it home. Nice view to admire for the rest of eternity though, if they don't.

Expand  

Don't underestimate the indoctrination processes of the Travelling Circus!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/20/2016 at 9:10 PM, Geschosskopf said:

there was nobody but Orbles to raise the technicality that, according to the Regulations for the Governance and Discipline of His Imperial Majesty's Trading Companies, command could not pass to somebody who was already dead.  

Expand  

I do love a document that thinks of everything in advance, especially the heretofore unobserved. For example the little-known "Section Z" of Article XVII of the United Nations Charter, specifying that in the event of a zombie apocalypse all the world's industries shall be converted to produce nothing but chainsaws and canned beans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/21/2016 at 12:10 AM, Kuzzter said:

I do love a document that thinks of everything in advance, especially the heretofore unobserved. For example the little-known "Section Z" of Article XVII of the United Nations Charter, specifying that in the event of a zombie apocalypse all the world's industries shall be converted to produce nothing but chainsaws and canned beans.

Expand  

Well, neither that document  nor mine thought of this situation.  All extant documents dealing with how command devolves in the event of a "decapitation" attack are written in terms of "If A is dead, then, B; if B is dead, then C,", and so on.  The tacit assumption is that the dead guy is hors de combat, neither present nor voting in the ensuing events.  None of them address the situation where the dead guy is still acting like nothing's wrong long after the buzzards have started circling.  I mean, I once assaulted a position where the guy running next to me lost the top half of his head and kept on advancing and shooting effectively for about 3 steps before succumbing to the inevitable.  That's about all you can expect from the dead even in Lousy Anna's armpit, for normal circumstances..  In abnormal circumstances, "The Book" has yet to be written and all testimony is highly suspect.

And should "Section Z" ever be necessary, let's hope there's another article that turns all energy industries into production of gasoline and 2-stoke oil :)

 

Edited by Geschosskopf
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well you've got a great point. [checks 25th Amendment] Yup, it's right there in ink and parchment. 

  Quote

Section 1. In case of the removal of the President from office or of his death or resignation, the Vice President shall become President.

Expand  

So, a hypothetical zombie/vampire/lich sorcerer President could be perfectly capable of executing the office--perhaps quite well depending on the extent of his supernatural powers--but the Vice President becomes President just because the President happens to be "dead". Is that justice, I ask you? Is that fair? And I suppose the answer to both questions is, "Yes", and "Get me a chainsaw and enough petroleum products to keep it running."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/21/2016 at 12:40 AM, Kuzzter said:

So, a hypothetical zombie/vampire/lich sorcerer President could be perfectly capable of executing the office--perhaps quite well depending on the extent of his supernatural powers--but the Vice President becomes President just because the President happens to be "dead". Is that justice, I ask you? Is that fair? And I suppose the answer to both questions is, "Yes", and "Get me a chainsaw and enough petroleum products to keep it running."

Expand  

But if the emperor has no clothes, who's to tell him so?  Especially if he has supernatural powers :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/21/2016 at 12:10 AM, Kuzzter said:

I do love a document that thinks of everything in advance, especially the heretofore unobserved. For example the little-known "Section Z" of Article XVII of the United Nations Charter, specifying that in the event of a zombie apocalypse all the world's industries shall be converted to produce nothing but chainsaws and canned beans.

Expand  

 

  On 3/21/2016 at 12:30 AM, Geschosskopf said:

 

And should "Section Z" ever be necessary, let's hope there's another article that turns all energy industries into production of gasoline and 2-stoke oil :)

Expand  

This got me thinking about the terrifying consequences of a zombie apocalypse in space, where  conventional internal combustion powered chainsaws would be of no use.

Solar-powered chainsaws would require prohibitively large areas of cells in order to produce the required power, and wouldn't be feasible in the outer solar system. An RTG-powered chainsaw would be awesome, but probably too heavy also.

For sustainable chainsaw operations in deep space, we're gonna need some serious improvement in battery technology... and don't get me started on the personal safety risks of operating a chainsaw in a low-gravity environment...:confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/21/2016 at 12:48 PM, UnusualAttitude said:

This got me thinking about the terrifying consequences of a zombie apocalypse in space, where  conventional internal combustion powered chainsaws would be of no use.

Solar-powered chainsaws would require prohibitively large areas of cells in order to produce the required power, and wouldn't be feasible in the outer solar system. An RTG-powered chainsaw would be awesome, but probably too heavy also.

For sustainable chainsaw operations in deep space, we're gonna need some serious improvement in battery technology... and don't get me started on the personal safety risks of operating a chainsaw in a low-gravity environment...:confused:

Expand  

As we say in the fire service, chainsaws are just a convenience.  Axes do the same job and don't need fuel :)  There are, of course, electric chainsaws already on the market, but you still have to recharge the batteries eventually, so they only last as long as the power grid.  So, axes win.  However, for chopping zombies, I'd prefer something designed for the job and use a sword.  Of course, using any chopping or thrusting weapon in low gravity would probably cause more problems than it solved so the best option would be to just join the winning side :)

Which brings up something I find fascinating.  There are many parallels between being a zombie and the desired end-game of a major religion.  So why do the zombies always have to be the bad guys?  I'm just throwing that out as food for thought, not to start a discussion on this subject.

But fortunately, the zombies in this story aren't aggressive so there's no need for chainsaws or anything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely throwing an axe at a space zombie would be more ideal, as it would also propel the hurler away from the danger with less risk of getting stuck in and then changing the center of gravity of both. You're gonna need rather a lot of axes though. And there's the risk of the axe breaching the mylar hull of course....

Does the Emperor outfit his Circus Ships with Space Axes (or even Space Pulaskis?)? (Just in case they turn agressive?)

Edited by Cydonian Monk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/21/2016 at 3:28 PM, Cydonian Monk said:

 You're gonna need rather a lot of axes though. And there's the risk of the axe breaching the mylar hull of course....

Expand  

There's another problem: since all planets and moons rotate about their axes, taking one to kill a zombie might have unforeseen consequences. ...OK I'll just show myself out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/21/2016 at 3:28 PM, Cydonian Monk said:

Surely throwing an axe at a space zombie would be more ideal, as it would also propel the hurler away from the danger with less risk of getting stuck in and then changing the center of gravity of both. You're gonna need rather a lot of axes though. And there's the risk of the axe breaching the mylar hull of course....

Expand  

I wonder how hard you could really throw an axe in zero-G?  The throwing motion would get you rotating from the get-go so you'd have to pull your punch a bit to try to get any accuracy.  Sure, real astronauts toss small, lightweight things around quite gently with no problem, but I haven't seen them hurling heavy objects hard enough to cause serious bodily harm.  But if you could throw something that hard, what if you miss?  It might not do the flimsy, light-weight hull any good.

  10 hours ago, Cydonian Monk said:

Does the Emperor outfit his Circus Ships with Space Axes (or even Space Pulaskis?)? (Just in case they turn agressive?)

Expand  

Well, there are some crash axes and Halligan tools to self-extricate after a bad landing but these assume a fair amount of gravity is present.  After all, you need a fair amount to wreck the ship to begin with :)

As mentioned above, my Kerbals have no superstitions about walking corpses because there's never been one before.  So the possible need to defend against zombies hasn't been considered.  However, should the Boffins ever thought it necessary, they'd probably come down on the side of  big hedge-clipping shears.  Pushing equally and oppositely on the handles to make a cut would eliminate the recoil problem and you could still stab and club with them should that be necessary.  This, of course, would be the no-power alternative to lasers.

  On 3/21/2016 at 5:04 PM, Kuzzter said:

There's another problem: since all planets and moons rotate about their axes, taking one to kill a zombie might have unforeseen consequences. ...OK I'll just show myself out.

Expand  

{GROAN}

  On 3/21/2016 at 6:13 PM, UnusualAttitude said:

Besides, using an axe rather than a chainsaw might just not cut it.

Expand  

Chainsaws weren't designed for use against moving targets so are quite clumsy things.  Now, one of those tree trimmers with the small chainsaw blade on the end of a pole might work better than a standard chainsaw, but you still have the problem of powering it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say in the events of a space-zombie apocalypse, the best way to get rid of a few zombies is with Weaponized Exhaust. If there are more zombies than that, it's probably time to take advantage of the whole "Highly pressurized, combustible liquid stored near highly pressurized LOX" thing going on inside of your fuel tank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, it was a long and busy week, then family came over. Fortunately, I had done some stuff beforehand and was able to slap something together today.

And hey, 10000 VIEWS!  Woohoo!  Thanks, everybody! 

Anyway, on with the show...

EPISODE 25: Bad Moon Rising

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Edited by Geschosskopf
add spoiler
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/26/2016 at 11:01 PM, Geschosskopf said:

Tune in next time when we try to pick up the pieces.

Expand  

Whaaaa? If I posted a picture of my face right now I'd have to put--I dunno, blobs or big red pi-symbols or something over my eyes to properly express the confusomancy that has taken charge of my person. I knew i shouldn't have started doing my taxes right before reading this...

ETA: *clink* and a re-read. Orbles! Yay Orbles! But oh, the cost... have been reading a new Doctor Strange comic recently, which really plays with the concept of magic having a cost someone must pay--and Very Bad Things happen when this is not done, and a big bill comes due. Will the kraken come calling? I'd leave the ladders extended just in case.

Edited by Kuzzter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...