mcirish3 Posted March 11, 2016 Share Posted March 11, 2016 1 hour ago, Navy2k said: I hereby claim prior use because I used soontm already in 1995 when my english teacher asked me when he is geting my homework. The savegame update funktionality is extended to mods and modcreators can use it to update their parts too. So it depends on the modchreator. Greetings Ben Ya what this guys said, for more detail see devnote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moh1336 Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 I got fed up of constant game crashes (mods vs ram) so when I heard 1.1 is coming I decided to stop playing KPS until it was released. Having spotted this topic yesterday, my desire to play has also returned. But given that I will be starting fresh with 1.1 I am resisting the urge. It hasn't been too bad as I have been beta testing for two other games, but with their current beta phase ending this week and KPS pre-release on the horizon, I am having a hard time keeping myself distracted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kerbuvim Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 I know that developing a console version produces a third-party firm, but why none on the website of this company, or the SQUAD forum have not an overlook the progress? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Speadge Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 57 minutes ago, Kerbuvim said: I know that developing a console version produces a third-party firm, but why none on the website of this company, or the SQUAD forum have not an overlook the progress? what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanamonde Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Some posts in this thread have been removed or edited. Please don't insult each other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kerbuvim Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 (edited) 50 minutes ago, Vanamonde said: Some posts in this thread have been removed or edited. Please don't insult each other. 1 hour ago, Speadge said: what? I hope your Russian is much better than my English. Почему ни на сайте Flying Tiger, ни на сайте SQUAD не освещается прогресс разработки консольных версий? Edited March 13, 2016 by Kerbuvim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcirish3 Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 (edited) 4 hours ago, Kerbuvim said: I hope your Russian is much better than my English. Почему ни на сайте Flying Tiger, ни на сайте SQUAD не освещается прогресс разработки консольных версий? Why any Flying Tiger website or on the website is not covered SQUAD progress developing the console versions ? Good question! Edited March 14, 2016 by mcirish3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Navy2k Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 I too would be much interested in a flying tiger website on which flying tigers report on the progress of squad. Here is my 1. design proposal: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Temeter Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 Lol, just go play something else until KSP is updated.* We're already at conspiracy theories. *Or play Real Solar System. RSS/RO/RP-0 rules. Gonna take half a millenium to update all that stuff to 1.1 anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Navy2k Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 1 hour ago, Temeter said: Lol, just go play something else until KSP is updated.* We're already at conspiracy theories. *Or play Real Solar System. RSS/RO/RP-0 rules. Gonna take half a millenium to update all that stuff to 1.1 anyway. My RSS Mars Ascent Vehicle only needs around 50 more hours before first flight testing. Shame there are no inflateable heatshields any more until 1.1 Greetings Ben Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Temeter Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 2 minutes ago, Navy2k said: My RSS Mars Ascent Vehicle only needs around 50 more hours before first flight testing. Shame there are no inflateable heatshields any more until 1.1 Greetings Ben You could just go with a large heatshield with minimal ablator. Mars atmosphere is super tame. Could probably even reenter with a fairing base, those are tough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Navy2k Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 6 hours ago, Temeter said: You could just go with a large heatshield with minimal ablator. Mars atmosphere is super tame. Could probably even reenter with a fairing base, those are tough. And how would I live with myself if I send something into space not looking as cool as it could so just to save a week design time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Temeter Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 1 hour ago, Navy2k said: And how would I live with myself if I send something into space not looking as cool as it could so just to save a week design time? Well, the space shuttle looks pretty silly and it didn't hurt one bit! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PilotsofRiots Posted March 15, 2016 Share Posted March 15, 2016 So around the 19th experimental testing is done? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FullMetalMachinist Posted March 15, 2016 Share Posted March 15, 2016 1 hour ago, PilotsofRiots said: So around the 19th experimental testing is done? Nobody knows. For previous updates that might have been about the right time frame, but this one is different. Squad has said a few times that due to the massive nature of this update Experimentals might go on for longer than usual. But don't worry, it'll be ready SoonTM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Navy2k Posted March 15, 2016 Share Posted March 15, 2016 11 hours ago, Temeter said: Well, the space shuttle looks pretty silly and it didn't hurt one bit! You kiss your mum with that mouth? Take that back immediately! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dafni Posted March 15, 2016 Share Posted March 15, 2016 11 hours ago, Temeter said: Well, the space shuttle looks pretty silly and it didn't hurt one bit! There should be a rule against blasphemy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Temeter Posted March 15, 2016 Share Posted March 15, 2016 (edited) Got a silly stubble nose with a bumb cockpit above it, underdeveloped wings, a ridiculously large tail fin and short legs. It's super-pragmatic, form follows function, like everything in space. I mean, just look at that mad scientists maze that is the ISS. But we love the design because we got used to it and what it stands for, it became iconic in a non-ubisoft way. Edited March 15, 2016 by Temeter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Navy2k Posted March 15, 2016 Share Posted March 15, 2016 3 hours ago, Temeter said: Got a silly stubble nose with a bumb cockpit above it, underdeveloped wings, a ridiculously large tail fin and short legs. It's super-pragmatic, form follows function, like everything in space. Your angle is a bit strange. Not to mention it's the only vehicle allowed to mate with a 747 to generate new superior offspring: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Temeter Posted March 15, 2016 Share Posted March 15, 2016 Fitting. 747 looks kinda dumb too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Navy2k Posted March 15, 2016 Share Posted March 15, 2016 49 minutes ago, Temeter said: Fitting. 747 looks kinda dumb too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Temeter Posted March 15, 2016 Share Posted March 15, 2016 (edited) It's the fat nose, looks like a flying whale. Also, look at dat tailfin. A380 at least compensates with badass wings and landing gear! Not that it would have a hard time getting a job as bell-ringer in Notre Dame. Edited March 15, 2016 by Temeter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Navy2k Posted March 15, 2016 Share Posted March 15, 2016 Thats it, i can only conclude your doing this on purpose now, because no one could really think the 380 is a better design than the 747. I'm lighting a candle at church for your taste next time, hm may be a while, the next mandatory service for me is the final anointing and I'm not a big fan of the optional ones. Greeting Ben Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexisBV Posted March 15, 2016 Share Posted March 15, 2016 The A380 still has a more balanced look than the 747SP. Put wider engines on a 747-400 or 800, then we have a contender. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curveball Anders Posted March 15, 2016 Share Posted March 15, 2016 31 minutes ago, Temeter said: It's the fat nose, looks like a flying whale. Also, look at dat tailfin. No, this is what a flying whale looks like Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts