Jump to content

Part-Heavy stock Craft for performance comparisons


Recommended Posts

Hi! With the pre-release on the horizon, one of the things I am looking forward to the most is that we can finally stop crystal-ball-gazing about the performance and get cold, hard numbers.

I'm really looking forward to comparing it myself, but to do so, I need "representative" crafts.

My question is, can someone share some crafts that I can use for benchmarking?

Requirements:

- Completely stock
- 2 crafts with 300 parts, 1 craft with 600 parts
- Should not break apart on physics loading
- Do not have to actually go to space, I will use hyperedit.
- One of the 300 parts crafts should have a lot of solar panels and fuel cells

 

That's about it. Does anyone have something similar floating around in their hangars? Or feel motivated to make that?
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, if you want a performance crushing craft, the MCSS(Modded Community Space Station) That I started is over 400 parts and sends my gtx 980 ti and intel 5820K into the 10 - 25 fps range. You can use that if you want.

I know you asked for stock, but I suspect you will be doing a modded benchmark run too, to compare performance from stock and modded games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you want to REALLY get serious about a performance load, here's my 1,500-part fuel station launcher.
(No mods required - pure stock)

https://www.mediafire.com/?4ca1cndyra1ro2c

LAUNCH FROM RUNWAY

Edited by Camaron
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Holy moly.... The performance gains...

1.0.5:

 250 parts: 7 FPS
 500 parts: 4 FPS
 1000 parts: not tested

1.1, experimental:

  250 parts: 60 FPS
  500 parts: 30 FPS
 1000 parts: 12 FPS

I have also noticed that with separate crafts (2x250 instead of 500 parts), the performance goes up a little, but not by much, like 30FPS to 35FPS.

Color me impressed.

My rig:

Spoiler

Intel Core i5 4690K, Clocked at 3.8 GHz, 4 Cores
Nvidia GTX 960
8GB Ram

 

Edited by Kobymaru
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kobymaru said:

Holy moly.... The performance gains...

My rig:

  Hide contents

Intel Core i5 4690K, Clocked at 3.8 GHz, 4 Cores
Nvidia GTX 960
8GB Ram

 

Ooooh. I have that same GPU, and a 6600K clocked at 4.5 Ghz. Considering I run lots of craft at once (BDA scenarios) I'm wondering if I would have gotten a benefit with a 6700K. If one of my cores could (barely) handle a ~500 part 5v5, with separate threads for each vessel I should be able to get some crazy stuff going. 20v20 even. Or 10v10 with lots of ground installations.

On second thought with the performance gains on single-core, I'm gonna try something like a 30v30. That's gonna be insane.

Edited by Hobbes Novakoff
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Kobymaru said:

Holy moly.... The performance gains...

1.0.5:

 250 parts: 7 FPS
 500 parts: 4 FPS
 1000 parts: not tested

1.1, experimental:

  250 parts: 60 FPS
  500 parts: 30 FPS
 1000 parts: 12 FPS

I have also noticed that with separate crafts (2x250 instead of 500 parts), the performance goes up a little, but not by much, like 30FPS to 35FPS.

Color me impressed.

My rig:

  Hide contents

Intel Core i5 4690K, Clocked at 3.8 GHz, 4 Cores
Nvidia GTX 960
8GB Ram

 

Nice! but wow.. I have nearly basically the same exact rig (same CPU and GPU, with 8 gigs of ram) and I would usually get at least 15-20 with 250 part crafts in 1.0.5... odd..

wait.. nm, i forgot i have had my delta time frame set to max forever now :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...