Jump to content

SpaceX Discussion Thread


Skylon

Recommended Posts

Tory Bruno casting some slight shade here:

 

Also doing a bit of maths:

With EOR Falcon Heavy can send 32t to TLI.

EOR of ten Falcon 9s - 3x15.6t payloads, 1 transfer core, 6 drop tanks could send 46.8t TLI powered by dracos. Under $600m in booster costs.

With on orbit propellant transfer Falcon Heavy can send about 67t to TLI.

Starship can obviously send 150t to the moon with propellant transfer. But with a Raptor powered third stage it can send 90t direct to Jupiter whilst retaining enough propellant to brake Starship back to earth aerocapture. That's insane.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, tater said:

 

Is that the one people were saying was going to do a turnaround faster than the fastest shuttle mission? If so, it looks like maybe not.

Of course, what I think we heard was that the issue was with the second stage, which isn't even the part that gets reused.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, mikegarrison said:

Is that the one people were saying was going to do a turnaround faster than the fastest shuttle mission? If so, it looks like maybe not.

Of course, what I think we heard was that the issue was with the second stage, which isn't even the part that gets reused.

No, that's the next Starlink mission B1051.5 currently on 83 days and counting, launch TBD.

ANASIS-2 is the potential record breaker reusing the Demo-2 booster 1058.2. It's targeting Sunday. If it takes off on either Sunday or the Monday backup window it will break the turnaround record. 50 or 51 days. Record is 54.

Edited by RCgothic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The crib notes are no flight currently envisaged for SN6. Skip straight to SN8.

SN7.1 test tank gets a weird naming convention, because Elon hasn't changed the naming convention recently enough.

Edited by RCgothic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RCgothic said:

 

Interesting, they plan to skip SN6 entirely?

11 minutes ago, RCgothic said:
Fairing potentially for SN8, though a eagle-eyed tweep spotted out had no header tank or RCS ports.

I'm pretty sure it has RCS ports, look closely at the nosecone at around 01:13:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, tater said:

The stacked nosecone has RCS ports in every shot til they rotate it.

That's what I get for not watching the video before posting.

The tweet I was referencing also asserted that the ring stack this nose cone had been assembled onto was one that had collapsed in the storms and been hammered back into shape, therefore not being in optimum condition.

But I'm understandable skeptical about that now!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Treveli said:

Has anyone else noticed that, if SN5 hops next week, it'll be just shy of a year since Hoppy made its first small hop? Makes me hopeful will see a hop in a few days.

Another anniversary I didn't realize, it's the 51st for Apollo 11. The spirits are favorable now for giant metal tubes to fly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...