Jump to content

Biplane Spaceplanes?


Recommended Posts

On 6/2/2018 at 8:42 PM, Lego_Prodigy said:

and I suddenly realized that none of the spaceplanes that Ive ever seen from real life were biplanes.

Attend an aerobatics show. You will se some there! (this is the famous Curtiss Pitts).

NCIKk.jpg

 

On 6/2/2018 at 8:42 PM, Lego_Prodigy said:

I know that the first biplanes were extremely draggy from almost everything, but Im referring to a sort of more modern material biplane.

The drag came from the aerodynamic forces that make the thing fly - it's not related to the material the wing is made of.

 

On 6/2/2018 at 8:42 PM, Lego_Prodigy said:

Would that work at all in things like reentry?

As badly as the usual single wings, as @steve_v answered here:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/27/2018 at 4:11 AM, Lisias said:

The drag came from the aerodynamic forces that make the thing fly - it's not related to the material the wing is made of.

 

 

Thats not true, as the fabric would wave and do all sorts of unintended things, and not only fabric but also things like corrugated metal were VERY draggy from material alone.

A famous example of this: the Ford Trimotor.

https://imgur.com/a/zseQm9K
Edited by Lego_Prodigy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Lego_Prodigy said:

Thats not true, as the fabric would wave and do all sorts of unintended things, and not only fabric but also things like corrugated metal were VERY draggy from material alone.

Here. Learn something new. :) 

351px-Drag_curves_for_aircraft_in_flight

The friction drag is the only part that can be mitigated by materials - but most of the time, the cost on sticking with the present "draggy" material is smaller than the cost of the new material, be that cost in weight, weather resistance, durability or the raw materials cost.

Observe that as as the velocity increases, the lift-induced drag ("my" drag) ceases to exist, while the skin induced drag ("your" drag) really kicks in. In the biplanes era, they used fabric because the low speeds of the airplanes of the era didn't justify using heavier materials to mitigate the skin-drag - as the lift-induced drag was the real problem - and having two sets of wings didn't helped too much on the matter.

It happens that you are not wrong. What happens too is that I'm not wrong neither. :D 

("together", we are right - welcome to engineering)

 

Edited by Lisias
typos.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...