XB-70A Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 91 (-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KerballingSmasher Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 (edited) 92 (+) Edited March 19, 2019 by Kerballing (Got Dunked On) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XB-70A Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 91 (-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KerballingSmasher Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 92 (+) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 93 + Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chel Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 94 (+) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KerballingSmasher Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 95 (+) YASS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XB-70A Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 (edited) 94 (-) Edited March 19, 2019 by XB-70A Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KerballingSmasher Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 (edited) 95 (+) Edited March 19, 2019 by Kerballing (Got Dunked On) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XB-70A Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 (edited) 60 (-) (Woot) Big fail... Edited March 19, 2019 by XB-70A Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dman979 Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 Well, it's about that time again, when the positive team finds out the last mistake they made. 2 hours ago, The_Cat_In_Space said: 62 (+) This post is valid. 2 hours ago, Barzon Kerman said: 63(+) Its the war of the cats! This post is not valid. It was edited after the next post, which makes it invalid by rule 2.4. 2 hours ago, Kerballing (Got Dunked On) said: 64 (+) Cat war... and I'm not part of it This post is invalid, since it follow from an invalid post. 2 hours ago, The_Cat_In_Space said: Barzon your post is invalid. Make it 63! 65 (+) In case you needed any proof, this post shows that even after two posts, Barzon Kerman's post hadn't been edited. It was only after the ping that he edited the post. The last valid number is The_Cat_In_Space's 62. 61 (-1) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KerballingSmasher Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 dang you 62 (+) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XB-70A Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 61 (-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dman979 Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 60 (-1) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KerballingSmasher Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 (edited) 61 (+) Edited March 19, 2019 by Kerballing (Got Dunked On) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Dman979 said: oof Rule 2.4 states that the move (+1, -1) is not to be edited after another move has been made. In order for this revert to be valid, I'm going to have to ask for proof that the move was changed. Edited March 19, 2019 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XB-70A Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 60 (-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KerballingSmasher Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 (edited) Just now, Aperture Science said: Rule 2.4 states that the move is not to be edited after another move has been made. In order for this revert to be valid, I'm going to have to ask for proof that the move was changed. *begins emphatically clapping* (61 (+)) Edited March 19, 2019 by Kerballing (Got Dunked On) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chel Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 NO! THIS IS WHY YOU EDIT YOUR POSTS PEOPLE! 62 (+) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KerballingSmasher Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 (edited) ^ 63 (+) BUT @Aperture Science just found a good loophole @Dman979 still has to prove, so for all practical reasons Aperture may have just reset it to 95 Edited March 19, 2019 by Kerballing (Got Dunked On) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chel Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 64 (+) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 (edited) Revert is invalid for now until proof is given, current number is 95 as per the last valid post: 9 minutes ago, Kerballing (Got Dunked On) said: 95 (+) Edited March 19, 2019 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KerballingSmasher Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 YES!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XB-70A Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 (edited) 63 (-) Edited March 19, 2019 by XB-70A Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KerballingSmasher Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 Just now, XB-70A said: 63 (-) nope Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts