GMO foods

[kerbiloid]

7 minutes ago, magnemoe said:

Again its an cartoon

The tomb is a rather strange place to watch cartoons... Though, these Ancient Egyptians...

9 minutes ago, magnemoe said:

now why are not the plow into the earth?

Into the stone floor, you wished to say? They can't, it's hard.
But they're trying their best.

[magnemoe]

12 minutes ago, kerbiloid said:

The tomb is a rather strange place to watch cartoons... Though, these Ancient Egyptians...

Into the stone floor, you wished to say? They can't, it's hard.
But they're trying their best.

This, book of the dead probably hold the bestseller list for graphic novels for 3K years. 

It was kind of sold as an walktrough for meeting your maker. 
Not foolproof more like how to make an Eve assent rocket or doing hard dungeons in an MMO. Way better than nothing.  
An major benefit is that none of the users came back to complain

And they had much more art than in tombs but like caves its there stuff survives millennia. 

[Clamp-o-Tron]

On 9/7/2020 at 9:41 AM, kerbiloid said:

If we want to make those lazy cropz to grow faster, first of all we should stop them from wasting the time and the energy on growing various useless organs.
Like the leavez, flowerz, rootz, and the stem.

This, in turn, makes us to make them actually unicellular.

But why need various unicellular crops when they grow in standard conditions, do not suffer from frost or from drought?
Do we actually need every nutrition component to be grown when they can be produced out of limited set of chemical compounds?
No, we do not.

So, we should take some algae and turn it into GMO-algae producing a limited basic set of compounds, from which we can synthesize whatever we want.

Basically, we should have two sorts of GMO-algae:

• for proteins (just because it's too tricky to synthesize them directly from inorganic compounds), say GMO-chlorella or/and GMO-spirulina;
• for cellulose (just because almost everything but proteins can be relatively easily manufactured out of cellulose via several intermediate compounds, and the photosynthesis looks like the easiest way to produce the cellulose).

They should be GMOed to make them produce the optimal ratio of compounds.

***

But can we eat (and drink) only plants?

Yes. No. Yes, but do it yourself.

We also need meat.

(Who doesn't need, he may not eat.)

***

But can we eat the protein made of algae?
No. They tried, and it's worse than outdated fastfood.

So, we should feed the algaic(?) protein to pigs to get the animal meat.

***

In its turn, the animal meat should grow without hooves, bones, hair, horns, brains, large sad wet eyes, and other useless parts.
It should grow like a meaty meat.

How should we make the pig grow no horns?
We should make the pig grow like a piece of pork. I.e. we should make the pig unicellular and grow it in a similar vat, feeding with (food? fertilizer?) made of the mentioned GMO-algae.

Here we come to the
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultured_meat

  Reveal hidden contents

We should grow a standard set of basic protein pastes composed from GMO chimeras of edible animals (pig+rabbit+tuna, hen+cow+cricket or whatever you need).

***

So:

1. Vats with cellulose-GMO-algae produce cellulose from air, water, and light.
2. The cellulose gets chemically made into sugars, fats, ethanol, whatever. Also colorizers, sweeteners, aromizers, plastificators, leaveners, and so on.
3. These are chemically turned into fertilizer.
4. Vats with protein-GMO-algae consume the fertilizer and produce required set of protein mixes.
5. Out of the the algaic protein and other things listed above we make a nutrition for the cultured meat. (I.e. for unicellular chimeric GMO pork-you-pine growing in the vat).
6. The GMO-meat cells consume the nutrition and grow, and we make protein mess of several basic compositions.
7. According to the standard recipes, we compose a standard set of basic food pastes (like "The standard foodpaste #234. Average standard 20%-lipid henpork with cola extract")..
8. Make food out of these food pastes and apply aromizers, colorizers, etc, to get what exactly we need. And of course, sodium glutamate, it's by definition.

9. Make the 5G-powered food combines which make foods from the cartridges of the standard components, according to the wikicookbook recipes.
10. Integrate all kitchen devices into a standard robokitchen set (as anyway, choosing between LG and Samsung microwaves is just a nasty showing off, they all are equal.)
11. Lease the social houses/flats with the robokitchen food production matching the payment plan on the customer's choice. From the welfare'rs to the i'm'fine'rs, i.e. from the basic set of food from the basic social income, to the premium-class food for additional payment units, as the kitchen doesn't care what to cook, it's the same for her, just recipes and materials differ.
12. As the robokitchen tycoon, collect the food wastes in the robokitchens as well, and remove them several times per day, together with the paste cartridges resupply.
So, your customers don't buy food, they rent the availability of the total cycle of food service on the corresponding payment plan.

13. Tools. As less as possible. So, take a cooked foodstick, put in paste, eat, utilize the single-use cellulose cap. May Ronald McDonald bless you.
Do not sort the organic wastes, it's idiotism. Any human wastes should be considered contaminated and should be totally destroyed and used for the new food production.

This needs energy. The energy is. It's deuterium fusion. Anyway all of this won't happen right tomorrow.
Ok, ok, solar panels are nice, too.

The best A good part of this is that there's no animal cruelty involved! Us vegans can go off skipping through pastures and kissing cows!

 

There are those vegans, however, that would say "ItS nOT NatURaL". Those are the ones you probably dislike. To which you say, "choose one- eat vegan stuff or some artificial muscle without a face."

Edited September 9, 2020 by Clamp-o-Tron

[kerbiloid]

7 hours ago, Clamp-o-Tron said:

The best A good part of this is that there's no animal cruelty involved!

Why? When people don't kill animals for food, they need no meat animals anymore.

So, as indeed, all people in this scheme technically become vegans (and I believe, it's an advantage), but either now you have to feed a pet cow instead of a pet hamster, or there is no sense in the agricultural animals anymore, and they won't be supported anymore.
So, the pastures will be partially occupied by algae farms, but mostly become national parks where the herd animals are not best survivors, and their current poplation is supported artificially because people eat them.

If google "how many cows in USA" and "USA bisons amount", etc, we can read that

in 1884 there was
~30 mln bisons (and almost no cities compared to the nowadays),

while now there are
~100 mln of cows,
~9 mln horses,
~75 mln hogs and pigs (I have no idea why/how do they count them separately),
~5 mln sheep and lambs (probably they would write "dogs and puppies", "cats and kittens")
~2.5 goats (strange, why not "goats and goats")
~90 mln dogs
~96 mln cats

(The USA is taken as an example of the "wild nature" → "urbanized territory" change happened in a century)

So, as we can see, the amount of animals is significantly overgrown compared to the wild nature capacity, because they get eaten by 300 mln of humans and 200 mln of human pets.
Also, they are fed mostly not on sunny pastures, but with artificially grown food, produced from artificially manufactured fertilizers, from those dirty, ugly, and toxic ammonia plants, spending a lot of coal to produce the ammonia from air and water, and thus producing great amount of greenhouse gases.

So, once people become vegans, instead of 200 mln cows, pigs, and other goats, there will be tens times lesser amount of various wild species, like bisons.

Meat-eaters are what lets the cows and pigs to live and even exist as a biological species.

And the algae-food will kill them (the herd animals) by making all people vegans.

Edited September 10, 2020 by kerbiloid