Jump to content

[WIP][1.1.3] Large Structural/Station Components [Image Heavy]


Recommended Posts

It seems like every time I come back to this thread (usually a few times a day if not once a day) there's something new. I really like what you have going here. This will definitely be a "must have" mod for me when I play KSP. Keep up the great work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about a plugin that changed the "glow" of the fins based on the % of current draw from the generator?

IE: no power being used or there is more positive on the grid than negative the fins stay the default texture color.

Full power being drawn from the generator and the fins glow at full brightness.

Scaled brightness in between based on generators total available output.

Just a thought lol.

Like this idea, though I'd have to do some nifty animation work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alternatively a light strip starting at green moving to red that lights up from one end to the other showing power draw. Not sure what its called specifically but the concept is commonly used on equalizers and volume meters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Collision mesh issue report:

lXhULPA.png

(all parts involved)

New stockalike textures are much prettier! :) IMHO large battery needs stockalike electricity logo too...

Not good! Radiator panners are too small for that huge amount of heat! Also pannels outnumbered and tightly placed... They must radiate heat to space, not to each other!

IMHO they must be like this or so:

P1aIP5j.png

Or maybe you can make a separate part "heat radiator". It can even be a folding! :)

- The collisions are fixed and will be in tonight's update.

- The generator will stay as is for the moment, I do like the idea of animated extending fins though, will work on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

buG4PUw.jpg

Testing out a new generator design.

Looks much more like a generator.

Some food for thought: ZobrAA is correct. A spacecraft's only method for dispelling heat in space is by radiation (visual light and IR mostly). This requires very large surface areas facing away from the spacecraft made from a metal and paint with a very high emissivity, which usually means silver or white surface. For example, WGS satellites have MASSIVE heatsinks for removing heat (big white squares on the sides):

AFG-120208-008.jpg

The fins on your generator are more suited for convection (like an air-cooled motorcycle engine) and would be radiating heat back onto one-another.

Now if adding large square sheets to your generator sounds unappealing, another possibility (and something I would prefer) is to make aesthetic heat syncs (retextured plates that are white and shiny) that can be mounted radially. That way we can add heatsinks to make it look customized, and even add them to other parts of the spacecraft.

Animated unfolding heatsinks sounds awesome too :)

Edited by Blaylock1988
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not good! Radiator panners are too small for that huge amount of heat! Also pannels outnumbered and tightly placed... They must radiate heat to space, not to each other!

IMHO they must be like this or so:

Or maybe you can make a separate part "heat radiator". It can even be a folding! :)

I have to agree, those small close fins absolutely will not work without and atmosphere, and probably not even then without active air circulation.

I like the idea of a folding radiator part, I could use them for other parts as well, There's not much of a heat system in KSP right now but there are ways of making cfg for a radiator part that will pull heat from engines

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not at the moment, no. But I do want to create some.

Alright, cool. I'm still getting them because they look bloody awesome! Can't wait to see what the IVAs look like!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some food for thought: ZobrAA is correct. A spacecraft's only method for dispelling heat in space is by radiation (visual light and IR mostly). This requires very large surface areas facing away from the spacecraft made from a metal and paint with a very high emissivity, which usually means silver or white surface.

This is only partially correct. Blaylock is lumping emissivity and reflectivity together, which is a problem since they are opposites of one another. Yes, efficient radiative cooling requires a high emissivity, but that means it must necessarily be a great absorber as well - and likewise a poor reflector. In the case of visible light, the best emitters are black. However, since the radiation from a spacecraft will be IR (you've got other problems if your spacecraft is hot enough to emit visible light), the heat sink could be painted pretty much any visible color - only its IR color would matter. That said, silver is pretty much the worst choice you could make, since silver objects have pitiful emissivity (in both visible and IR), due to being great reflectors. Dull gray would be okay, and would save on the weight of paint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But wouldn't black radiators lose more heat with "black body radiation"? Every bit counts after all. I wonder if it's possible to turn backsides of solar pannels into radiators :D We would get two functions with one part - generating electricity and removing heat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is the update compatible with old ships?

This is the station I'm building:

screenshot21fd.png

(that's the corridor with the hatch on it BTW)

You can update without the need to worry about losing ships.

All that changes are the model and texture, the configs remains the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

May i suggest a less brownish, more whito-greyish tint (you know what i mean :wink:)? I know, tastes and colours... and technical issues, but it would fit even more whith the stock parts. Whadayathink?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

May i suggest a less brownish, more whito-greyish tint (you know what i mean :wink:)? I know, tastes and colours... and technical issues, but it would fit even more whith the stock parts. Whadayathink?

Not the first time this has been asked.

Tp reiterate, the parts are meant to look weathered. Re-texturing all parts will be quite a task, and I kept away from stockalike textures to as not to directly duplicate Squad's intellectual property.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now, a question for everyone. How big do you want your hydroponics module. Envisage a large dome, am contemplating a making an in-line variant.

I currently have it modelled at a 4 meter diameter, but I know you lot like challenging launches so may go 2 meters larger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was gonna say keep it at 4 cuz I know I personally don't like the callenging launches.

but I got to thinking it over and tried out a couple sizes

4SjaV17.png

And if that's what you mean by inline, then I vote for 6, cuz 4 will be too small.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now, a question for everyone. How big do you want your hydroponics module. Envisage a large dome, am contemplating a making an in-line variant.

I currently have it modelled at a 4 meter diameter, but I know you lot like challenging launches so may go 2 meters larger.

I think the 2.5 meter version of the greenhouse is also required. In fact, UDK-O3 is suitable for these purposes :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...