Jump to content

doesn't this brake the laws of physics?


Fried

Recommended Posts

Kerbal engineers have actually pioneered designs that can fly forever inside an atmosphere using the magic of control surfaces.

You've gotta take Kerbal physics with a grain of salt - all of this just adds to the goofiness of the game :D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem here is that it's way too easy to reach such ridiculously high speeds in KSP.

TurboJet's are specifically designed to reach those speeds (and upto 2400). It's in the cfg file ;p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who knows, for now we can safely assume that Kerbals are masters at materials science, and have been able to create materials for the skins of their vehicles that can withstand these speeds and stresses with no ill effect whatsoever that can't be corrected during routine maintenance.

Just because us humans, better pilots though we might be (why else are we hired to replace Kerbals as guidance units), can't create such materials doesn't mean they can't be created by Kerbals.

It'd probably need a pretty efficient heat sink of course, THAT might be tricky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who knows, for now we can safely assume that Kerbals are masters at materials science, and have been able to create materials for the skins of their vehicles that can withstand these speeds and stresses with no ill effect whatsoever that can't be corrected during routine maintenance.

Just because us humans, better pilots though we might be (why else are we hired to replace Kerbals as guidance units), can't create such materials doesn't mean they can't be created by Kerbals.

It'd probably need a pretty efficient heat sink of course, THAT might be tricky.

Alternatively, maybe my theory on Kerbals being an offshoot of the Orkish race and therefore incredibly powerful psykers who just don't know it is more correct than I thought?

oOOooOooooOoooo... (creepy sound)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't break the laws but it think it is a bit beyond our current level of tech. if you find a material that can tolerate the temps involved or devise a way to insulate the plasma from actually touching the skin of the craft it would be entirely doable I think.

neither of which we are currently capable of, as far as I know :)

Not necessarily... We can already control superheated plasma in fusion reactors such as ITER and it should be relatively simple matter to keep a superconducting magnet at near absolute zero on a spacecraft while it is literally blazing through the atmosphere(!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think I may not be getting the question here, but we all know how the Columbia orbiter was lost, don't we? Slight crack in the frame, plasma got inside the structure during re-entry at some ungodly speed, and ripped the internals apart. Re-entry is performed from orbital speeds in RL. They don't stop in space and fall down, they come screaming in at mach 5 over the pacific to land in Florida on the Atlantic. Dont they? maybe Im supremely misinformed from years of American press covering it, but that pic is pretty much what I picture in RL, gussied up for visual effects.OT: You guys see the video of the meteor in Russia a couple of months ago? Rrrruuuuummmmmbbbbbbbbllllllleeeeee...KABOOM!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting near hypersonic speeds while still fairly low in the atmosphere? Ludicrous, perhaps... but doesn't violate any laws of physics.

Correct. No natural laws voided, just the warranty on the aircraft. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think I may not be getting the question here, but we all know how the Columbia orbiter was lost, don't we? Slight crack in the frame, plasma got inside the structure during re-entry at some ungodly speed, and ripped the internals apart. Re-entry is performed from orbital speeds in RL. They don't stop in space and fall down, they come screaming in at mach 5 over the pacific to land in Florida on the Atlantic. Dont they? maybe Im supremely misinformed from years of American press covering it, but that pic is pretty much what I picture in RL, gussied up for visual effects.OT: You guys see the video of the meteor in Russia a couple of months ago? Rrrruuuuummmmmbbbbbbbbllllllleeeeee...KABOOM!

this is correct the shuttle dose not have nor need enough fuel to stop its orbit completely just enough to deorbit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The main reason this "breaks physics" would be that with earth tech, the plasma would melt the plane, but ksp doesn't have re-entry heat added yet, as well as we don't know how well they would stand up to re-entry, but you can do the same thing with deadly re-entry installed, you just have to point the bottom of your spacecraft forwards and take a shallower re-entry angle. so i don't really see how this breaks anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I brought the design down to one engine and increased the fuel, and was cruising at 24000m at 1500 m/s this does not seem at all right.

1500 m/s is only Mach 4.4, which is within the realm of plausibility.

EDIT: Observe the North American X-15 aircraft model, capable of flight at over Mach 6. 1500 m/s is child's play compared to that.

Edited by Holo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed, the super heating is the issue at that speed, however we are in the realm of plausibility with the latest tests that DARPA has completed. They are done with the current program testing and are beginning a new one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1500 m/s is only Mach 4.4, which is within the realm of plausibility.

EDIT: Observe the North American X-15 aircraft model, capable of flight at over Mach 6. 1500 m/s is child's play compared to that.

Yes, however that was high as in the edge of the atmosphere, same with sr71.

Missiles for used against planes or ships can reach over 3000 km/h in low atmosphere.

Plane will not come apart if build well, however it will brake down to mach 2 or something unless it had some pretty unreal engines, rocket engines would do it for an short time.

---

I did an test with the orion pulsed nuclear rocket.

I accelerated up past 100.000 m/s and went to Eve in around a day, now I aerobraked :)

Interesting 24km attitude was enough to stop me. The braking force was peaked on over 7000 g, yes this caused damage to ship. everything who was radial connected fell off, guess an larger structure on the top would also collapse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SR71 black bird.

Does it do that?

no.

Why do I bring it up?

Well it leaks all over the place on the ground. It has to refuel once it gets up in the air. All the seals and the like seal themselves once they warm up and at the pressures encountered during flight. At the speed and altitudes it flys at it's skin anneals itself during the flight due to the heat from friction with the atmosphere.

So while it doesn't produce reentry effects like that... if you got a plane going fast enough... it would produce effects like that. such a plane would have to have a lot of heat shielding components as any normal plane parts would melt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...