Jump to content

Explanations for the Extreme Densities of Kerbol Worlds


Euracil

Recommended Posts

Top Kerbonautics "experts" are clueless as to what causes the extreme densities of objects in the Kerbol system, and why other star systems are unaffected. Hypotheses conflict. Some suggest the presence of some unknown element or elements. Others point towards an excess of dark matter in the system. Some do not explain anything at all, calling for unnecessary missions that would only work as billion-dollar fireworks. :confused:

What do you suggest?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BROTORO STAHP.

Nah just kidding :P

Although I have an, uh, really complex, but possible, theory on this.

Baaaaaaaaaaaassiiicalllyyyy, the whole Kerbol system is created by a highly technologically advanced alien species conducting an experiment. The subject of this experiment is to analyze the comportment of a biologically engineered specie that has a limited IQ, a ridiculous hunger for spatial exploration and advanced rocket technology at their disposition. The Kerbals. But, to make this experiment quicker, they decided to artificially create a reduced scale solar system so that interplanetary trips would be much quicker.

Now, how does it work? Well first you need a star. So, they just took a brown dwarf, that was way too shabby to start nuclear fusion on it's own, and heated it with lasers until it actually started the chain reaction that triggerd nuclear fusion within the brown dwarf, creating a low mass star. It's rather large diameter is explained by the fact that the newly triggered fusion tries to expulse the outer layers of the star outwards, but it's low gravitational force due to it's extremely low mass has a hard time keeping it close, creating a much larger diameter than it originally had and also that would be expected.

Now we have a star, time for some super massive planets. Instead of creating some new supermassive material, why not take what's already around free to use? Aka neutron stars? So all you need to do is haul half a dozen of those around the newly ignited star, chunk them off to have the desired mass, put them in the right orbit, build a radiation shield around them that then also happens to be the surface of the new planet or moon, and tada, you have a basic canevas for a planet. Just add some details to the surface, an atmosphere if you wish so, and you should have something pretty neat, that seems superdense, but that is basically hollow with an actually superdense neutron star core.

Just add the Kerbals to Kerbin, leave a few rocket parts lying by the side of the roads, and watch them shoot to space with the most ridiculous contraptions they can think of.

tl;dr: Magratheans.

Edited by stupid_chris
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think (not sure at all) they have to made that choice because of rounding mathematics.

Just look how Jool is buggy near the surface (cause of its hard gravity force).

They just made the choice to have a reduced scale planetary system to make the game much more playable on numerous factors (let's not start this debate here). Then, the maths from gravity give us the mass of the bodies, and then with this mass you can determine the density,and turns out they are all way too high to be true... with normality :P

But since we just want that damn normality back, we're trying to find the "HOW THE HELL" are those planets so dense :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My guess is that the Kerbal universe is set in a different universe than ours in which the gravitational constant is much higher than it is here. So their planets isn't actually that much denser than ours, it's just that they need less mass to get the same gravitational pull than us because of their higher value of G.

But then one can wonder what other effects that a higher G can have. Like stars needing less mass, gas giants starting fusions and some other mumbo jumbo.

But that's just how I see it. It's about equally science fiction that the extreme densities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're all made out of pure uranium. Which is why you get kerbals.

that would make the whole planet one big ball of fission reactor. the surface would probibly be completely molten.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My guess is that the Kerbal universe is set in a different universe than ours in which the gravitational constant is much higher than it is here. So their planets isn't actually that much denser than ours, it's just that they need less mass to get the same gravitational pull than us because of their higher value of G.

But then one can wonder what other effects that a higher G can have. Like stars needing less mass, gas giants starting fusions and some other mumbo jumbo.

But that's just how I see it. It's about equally science fiction that the extreme densities.

Actually if you check in game with the new info on the map view, the knowledge system gives you the mass you would expect with the current G value, so it doesn't really works :l

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually if you check in game with the new info on the map view, the knowledge system gives you the mass you would expect with the current G value, so it doesn't really works :l

Ye, that kind of ruined that theory but still, it isn't less unrealistic than the extreme mass material :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously the Kerbol system is in a different universe with a different and much larger gravitational constant. At least that's how I cope with it, when I play and want to stop thinking about this question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously the Kerbol system is in a different universe with a different and much larger gravitational constant. At least that's how I cope with it, when I play and want to stop thinking about this question.

Read up the last posts, that doesn't really work :l

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Read up the last posts, that doesn't really work :l

Uh oh... Um, um... Their version of NIST defined the kilogram using a block of ice which slowly evaporated redefining the kilogram to be much lighter than ours!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kerbin has a density of 58475kg/m³ and pure uranium has a density of 19100kg/m³, making Kerbin three times more dense than pure uranium. That's the problem here, it's that all the planets are way too dense to be common materials.

Anyway, even the most stable form of uranium would end up becoming a large nuclear bomb under the heat and pressure present at the core of a planet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...