Demon_82 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 CPU: Intel i7 920 @ 3'50GHzRAM: 6x 2GB Kingston ValueRam DDR3 1333GPU: nVidia GTX 560 Ti @ GPU 945MHz / GDDR 2270MHzSSD: OCZ Vertex 3 240GBAnd after fiddling with game settings it can manage 600+ parts ships, but not without sweating xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shania_L Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 AMD Phenom II x2 550 3.1GHz4Gb RAM (DDR3 IIRC)ATi Radeon HD 4850 1Gb GDDR5KSP is installed on my SSD if that affects anything or not.Win 7 64bitBut then I run on 1280x1024 resolution so that helps a little. Widescreen, is a fad, it'll never last I haven't experianced any serious lagging since I built a fairly large (for me) ship in 0.18 or 0.19 it had about 4-500 parts I think?These days I build small anyway, I get the yellow MET indicator quite often but it doesn't seem to affect gameplay noticably. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rasheed Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 AND Dual-Core E1-1200 1.4GHZ4GB DDR3 RAM500 HDDAMD Radeon HD 7310 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD3 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Intel i5 2500k 3.3ghz8gb Crucial Ballistix Sport (2x4gb)Sapphire Radeon HD7850 2gbI play it on either Windows 7 64 bit or Fedora 19 64 bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eskarina Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 i3 3,3Gh // 32Gbs Ram // GTX560ti // Win8pro64x // "27 ScreenI will update stuff someday... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RunningGloves Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 AMD Phenom II X3 720 clocked at 3.2GHzRadeon 68508GB RAMSeems to run fine with anything up to ~150 parts, although MechJeb causes a bit of stutter even with small ships for some reason. I'd love to upgrade to something a bit more new.Heavily modified speak-and-spell with serial cable-braille interface.128k 500Hz RAMText output with braille option.Awesome, how many seconds per frame do you get? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
minerman30 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Core i5 3.4Gh 4670k, 16gb RAM, Nvidia Geforce 650 TI Boost 2G VRAMi3 3,3Gh // 32Gbs Ram // GTX560ti // Win8pro64x // "27 ScreenI will update stuff someday... Why do you have 32gb of RAM? I'm assuming that computer has a purpose of something else? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD3 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 i3 3,3Gh // 32Gbs Ram // GTX560ti // Win8pro64x // "27 ScreenI will update stuff someday... Core i5 3.4Gh 4670k, 16gb RAM, Nvidia Geforce 650 TI Boost 2G VRAMWhy do you have 32gb of RAM? I'm assuming that computer has a purpose of something else?32gb is a little bit overkill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfedg Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Intel Core I7 920Nvidia GeForce GTX 560ti 1gb vram6gb RamMy machine is aging a bit. A few years old for the pc and the graphics card is a bit newer.I experience lag at the loading screens frequently, but the game runs smooth even with relatively high part counts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TUFOM Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 I have 8GB DDR3 ram and game crashes time to time "illegal memory allocation" or something like that. KSP ram usage is in that moment around 3.5-3.7GB. So my actual guestion is will it run more smoothly with linux ubuntu? I have it on dual boot but always played in windows all games... And yeah I have 8 mods and like every one of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pulsar Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 i5-3570KGigabyte Nvidia GeForce 660 2GB8 GB ram.1440x900 MonitorNever crash. start to lag on about 300+ parts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunken Hobo Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 6.5 year old iMac. 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo. 2 GB ram. ATI Radeon HD 2600 Pro with 256 MB. No need to spec the HD, its the usual slow stock Mac option. It will probably barely handle Mavericks OS when that comes out. It sometimes handles KSP well.Yes, some of you will feel better now with your own rig specs.I think I rival you for worst computer on this thread:Windows XPIntel Core 2 Duo 1.86Ghz2 GB ramNvidia GeForce 210 512MBAlso a 17" CRT 4:3 monitor. Yeah!It's to KSP's credit that it is completely playable. I think it was the early 0.18 versions that nearly ruined it for me, but there's been so much optimisation since then it runs rather smoothly, albeit with reduced graphics settings. Have to go easy on the mods too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rarity Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 i7-3770k32GB DDR3@2000MHzGeForce GTX 760 2GB (soon to be R9-290X)Intel 520 120GB SSD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
katateochi Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 A radioactive potato (which equates to)i7 @3.07GHz6GB CORSAIR dominator RAM 2 GeForce GTX 460's (with dual 24' monitors @1920x1200)Runs pretty much fine playing stock. Variable performance with mods. I've spent a lot of time pruning mod parts down to just what I need, if I put any more parts in I get frequent crashes. I've got about 900 parts installed and its reasonably stable. Also before playing modded KSP I get the task manger out and all but cripple windows. Basically if its using more memory that csrss.exe then I kill it, ie; browsers, steam, dropbox, dwm and sometimes explorer (that depends on what else I'd doing). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LtHeckard Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Intel Pentium Dual Core B940 2.0 GHzIntel HD 30004Gb RAM560Gb HDD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SargeRho Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 GTX770, AMD Athlon 5000+ x2 at 2.61ghz, 2GB DDR3-1066, 500gb HDD.I got the 770 for my birthday, and will soon replace the rest of my PC with a new motherboard, cpu, RAM, HDD and add an SSD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Camelotking524 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Since my last build literally went up in smoke, I guess Ill list both rigs I have run them on. I have noticed a small (5 frames) increase in performance on massive part count builds. Old Build.AMD Phenom II 955BE6 GB DDR2Geforce 470New BuildAMD FX-83208gb DDR3Geforce 660ti Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bilfr3d Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Windows 8 64 bitIntel i3 2.1Ghz dual core processor1Gb dedicated graphics4Gb RAM.....Runs fairly well. Put it this way, my 125 part (around abouts anyway) space station runs fairly fluid at full res. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theonegalen Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 My only computer is a laptop. Almost two years old now but still plays great.Toshiba Satellite P750.Windows 7 Home Premium (64)Intel Core i7-2670QM @ 2.2GhzGeForce GT 540M, 1Gig VRAM8Gig system RAM15" 1366x768 displayChugs significantly around 250-300 parts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattd390 Posted October 14, 2013 Share Posted October 14, 2013 Laptop Intel i7 2670QM 16 GB ram 240 GB SSD Intel HD graphics This plays KSP pretty well! I did have to crank down my settings but it works fine for games at work or between classes.Travel Rig Pentium G3320 Haswell CPU ($70 LOL!) AsRock B85M-ITX MB 8 GB ram 120 GB SSD GTX 260 graphics card BitFenix Prodigy case I built this to use when I go to my weekly KSP meet ups. It plays the game maxed out. For only being a $70 CPU, it plays it it really well! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteevyT Posted October 14, 2013 Share Posted October 14, 2013 i5 2500K @stock 3.3GHzRadeon 78508GB RAMI think that's all that's really relevant to KSP. I run it maxed out and occasionally record. I also have a heavily modded game, I think I'm using close to 3GB of RAM just for KSP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattd390 Posted October 14, 2013 Share Posted October 14, 2013 AND Dual-Core E1-1200 1.4GHZ4GB DDR3 RAM500 HDDAMD Radeon HD 7310How does that handle KSP? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John.E Posted October 14, 2013 Share Posted October 14, 2013 Windows 7 64bitAsus P5N-d 750i chipsetCore 2 Duo E8400 3Ghz6GB DDR22 x 320GB SATA2 as 640GB RAID 01GB GTX650Ti420W PSURuns everything topped out @ 1280x1024 but limited to how many parts in one hit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A-Rob Posted October 14, 2013 Share Posted October 14, 2013 Windows 7 64bitSome Gigabyte MainboardIntel i5 2500K nVidia 760GTX8GB Corsair RAMCurrenlty on HDD, moving soon to SSD Runs flawless on 1920x1080 with every settings on the highest possible option Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hodo Posted October 14, 2013 Share Posted October 14, 2013 i5 3470 3.20GHZ CPU8GB RAMW7/64500GB HDDNvidia 260GTX GPUI run KSP fine as long as I keep the total parts count below 400. Between 400-500 it gets a bit laggy, but I can push that to 500-600 if I run my Game Booster program, which pauses or kills most windows background programs and gives priority to the game I am running. But KSP doesn't use more than 4gb of RAM anyway so it doesn't really load my computer much. And there is a slight memory leak in it or in one of the plugins. I may do some testing after .22 to see if I can find it. For those of you who are having lag issues in game and are using a Nvidia card, you can set it to run the physics instead of graphics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now