Azimech Posted October 14, 2015 Share Posted October 14, 2015 Ouch. Yeah that's too much. And tell you what: steel beams are too heavy, I'd use struts instead. Using No Offset Limits you can slide the top of the towers down (or the bridge up) to connect struts, slide everything back and then you can go beyond the strut 10 meter limit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbia Posted October 14, 2015 Share Posted October 14, 2015 Ouch. Yeah that's too much. And tell you what: steel beams are too heavy, I'd use struts instead. Using No Offset Limits you can slide the top of the towers down (or the bridge up) to connect struts, slide everything back and then you can go beyond the strut 10 meter limit.Actually, I use NoOffsetLimits as well and struts to make procedural cockpits myself, like this one:But I think I'll keep the steel beams, if I use the struts, they might be too.. thin. I'll give it a shot, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azimech Posted October 14, 2015 Share Posted October 14, 2015 To achieve a length of 10m with beams you need approx. 1t. One strut with the same length is 50 kg. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Rocket Scientist Posted October 14, 2015 Share Posted October 14, 2015 Working on a Juno with custom solar panels.http://i.imgur.com/LHCaORO.pngAre those science parts?Thanks, it's actually pretty small, 4 meters width. It stretches through the entirety of the SPH, though.I wish I had thought twice before using Mk1 Fuselages.. SRB cans would've saved me a lot of lag.1839 parts is really, really insane.http://i.imgur.com/FtXJpQ2.png1839? I think when your part count can be mistaken as a year, it's way too high. BTW, I think that puts you above zekes' shuttle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YargJay9991 Posted October 14, 2015 Share Posted October 14, 2015 This may sound stupid, but where is this No Offset Limit you guys are talking about? I had no idea such a thing existed! Imagine the possibilities:confused:...I'm assuming it's in the Alt+F12 debug/cheats menu? I haven't seen it there.Thanks in advanceYargJay9991 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CommanderSpock Posted October 14, 2015 Share Posted October 14, 2015 This may sound stupid, but where is this No Offset Limit you guys are talking about? I had no idea such a thing existed! Imagine the possibilities:confused:...I'm assuming it's in the Alt+F12 debug/cheats menu? I haven't seen it there.Thanks in advanceYargJay9991Nah, it's a mod. Just google it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 15, 2015 Share Posted October 15, 2015 (edited) It makes everything soo easy, it is more fun without ithttp://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/121034-1-0-2-May12-NoOffsetLimits-Removes-limits-for-part-offset-in-editor Edited October 15, 2015 by RevanCorana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScriptKitt3h Posted October 15, 2015 Share Posted October 15, 2015 I finally dug something I should've completed a long time ago out of the hangar...perhaps it'll be done soon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azimech Posted October 15, 2015 Share Posted October 15, 2015 It makes everything soo easy, it is more fun without ithttp://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/121034-1-0-2-May12-NoOffsetLimits-Removes-limits-for-part-offset-in-editorI feel it should be a toggle together with other cheats. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
selfish_meme Posted October 15, 2015 Share Posted October 15, 2015 I feel it should be a toggle together with other cheats.I feel that while the overheating bug exists it is necessary, a few more structural pieces big and small would not go astray either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbia Posted October 15, 2015 Share Posted October 15, 2015 So I was digging through my ships and found the B-24 I had built a while back, but never released it because I felt it was too inaccurate from the real thing -- It's too fat and such, as well as being ugly. And it is one hell of a clipfest.The thing is, it flies. It can bomb targets like a B-17, albeit with more capacity, in fact.Should I release it still, after a few revisions? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YargJay9991 Posted October 15, 2015 Share Posted October 15, 2015 Nah, it's a mod. Just google it.Ah ok! Cheers man. YargJay9991 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Majorjim! Posted October 15, 2015 Share Posted October 15, 2015 I feel it should be a toggle together with other cheats.Agreed. It makes certain things quicker and allows for lower part counts too. No offset limit killed the cubic strut, almost. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbia Posted October 16, 2015 Share Posted October 16, 2015 "Dive Bombing" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Majorjim! Posted October 16, 2015 Share Posted October 16, 2015 "Dive Bombing"http://i.imgur.com/kBKJhRK.gif She's looking great Columbia! How much work still to do? Any issues? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbia Posted October 16, 2015 Share Posted October 16, 2015 She's looking great Columbia! How much work still to do? Any issues?Thanks! I was actually typing down the release thread for it and many other aircraft I developed when I saw your comment It's actually finished, I just need to work on maneuverability (You need to pull out of a dive quickly) and handling. Otherwise, it's really fun to fly, actually! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Majorjim! Posted October 16, 2015 Share Posted October 16, 2015 Thanks! I was actually typing down the release thread for it and many other aircraft I developed when I saw your comment It's actually finished, I just need to work on maneuverability (You need to pull out of a dive quickly) and handling. Otherwise, it's really fun to fly, actually!It looks it! The shape is really good too. I will keep an eye out for it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlipNascar Posted October 16, 2015 Share Posted October 16, 2015 I've had no real KSP time this week. But I did make some refinements to the Kestrel. Sadly, now I'm left with an entirely useless bird of prey. Bad things happen above 30m/s. All those control surfaces reap havoc. And it seems surprisingly difficult to tag anything in its talons.Lengthened the nose and subsequently need to rework the "head and face" completely. The profile was all wrong, too short a head for the body. But, the wings flap thanks to the magic of the spider engine so it looks like it flaps its wings, sort of. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetenginestar Posted October 17, 2015 Share Posted October 17, 2015 Thanks! I was actually typing down the release thread for it and many other aircraft I developed when I saw your comment It's actually finished, I just need to work on maneuverability (You need to pull out of a dive quickly) and handling. Otherwise, it's really fun to fly, actually!Maybe add / extend dive brakes to slow the aircraft during a dive? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbia Posted October 17, 2015 Share Posted October 17, 2015 Maybe add dive brakes to slow the aircraft during a dive?https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b6/Dauntless_bomb_drop.jpgI tried that myself, it caused the aircraft to pitch up and remove the entire purpose of dive bombing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Rocket Scientist Posted October 17, 2015 Share Posted October 17, 2015 Criticism greatly appreciated: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yukon0009 Posted October 17, 2015 Share Posted October 17, 2015 Criticism greatly appreciated:http://i.imgur.com/84yzItj.pngWhat's that supposed to be? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Rocket Scientist Posted October 17, 2015 Share Posted October 17, 2015 What's that supposed to be?Star wars speeder bike. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goomblah Posted October 17, 2015 Share Posted October 17, 2015 Criticism greatly appreciated:http://i.imgur.com/84yzItj.pngDoes it fly? (It looks really good though!) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Rocket Scientist Posted October 17, 2015 Share Posted October 17, 2015 Does it fly? (It looks really good though!)No, and thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.